Softwr

Software · head to head

Seequent Central vs GEOVIA GEMS

Seequent Central logo

Seequent Central

Software

Collaborative platform for subsurface data management

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
GEOVIA GEMS logo

GEOVIA GEMS

Software

Comprehensive geology and mine planning solution

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Seequent Central cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option; GEOVIA GEMS the GEOVIA portfolio page on 3ds.com lists Surpac, MineSched, Whittle and Services but does not name GEMS or any of its editions, and no page found for GEMS itself publishes a figure or a named tier
  • They diverge on capability: Seequent Central covers Version control, GEOVIA GEMS covers Geological modeling.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Seequent Central and GEOVIA GEMS actually diverge.

Attributes where Seequent Central and GEOVIA GEMS differ
AttributeSeequent CentralGEOVIA GEMS
PlatformsCloud, WindowsWindows
Founded20041981

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Seequent Central

  • Version control
  • Model publishing
  • Data management
  • Audit trails
  • Secure sharing
  • Leapfrog Geo
  • Leapfrog Works
  • Oasis montaj

Only in GEOVIA GEMS

  • Geological modeling
  • Multi-element analysis
  • Resource estimation
  • Mine planning
  • Reserve reporting
  • MineSched
  • Whittle
  • Surpac

Both cover

  • Windows support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Seequent Central

  • Centralised version control and audit trails for geological modelsnot GEOVIA GEMS
  • Shared 3D visualisation of Leapfrog and Oasis montaj models across distributed teamsnot GEOVIA GEMS
  • Project branching for scenario modellingnot GEOVIA GEMS
  • Mining exploration and geothermal project coordinationnot GEOVIA GEMS
  • Civil engineering and environmental projects needing a single model of recordnot GEOVIA GEMS

GEOVIA GEMS

  • Complex deposit modelingnot Seequent Central
  • Multi-element estimationnot Seequent Central
  • Strategic planningnot Seequent Central
  • Reserve calculationsnot Seequent Central
  • Compliance reportingnot Seequent Central

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Seequent Central

  • Cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
  • Hosting instances start at a minimum 500GB of storage, with more sold as an add-on
  • Billing splits into three separate lines: cloud hosting per organisation, user subscriptions per person and Leapfrog Connector licences per modeller
  • Publishing models from Leapfrog into Central requires a separate Leapfrog Connector licence
  • Value depends on already owning other Seequent tools such as Leapfrog, GeoStudio, PLAXIS or Oasis montaj

GEOVIA GEMS

  • The GEOVIA portfolio page on 3ds.com lists Surpac, MineSched, Whittle and Services but does not name GEMS or any of its editions, and no page found for GEMS itself publishes a figure or a named tier

Pricing, plan by plan

Seequent Central

On request
  • Central Team$5000/year
    • Version control
    • 5 users included
    • 100GB storage
  • Central Professional$12000/year
    • All Team features
    • 25 users included
    • 500GB storage
  • Central EnterpriseFree
    • Unlimited users
    • Unlimited storage
    • SSO integration

GEOVIA GEMS

On request
  • GEMS Core$10000/year
    • Geological modeling
    • Data management
    • 3D visualization
  • GEMS Professional$18000/year
    • Advanced geostatistics
    • Mine design
    • Multi-element modeling

Which should you pick?

Choose Seequent Central if

  • You need version control.
  • You work on Cloud, Windows.
  • You also want model publishing.
Seequent Central review

Choose GEOVIA GEMS if

  • You need geological modeling.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want multi-element analysis.
GEOVIA GEMS review

Questions people ask

Is Seequent Central or GEOVIA GEMS better?
Neither clearly leads. Seequent Central starts at On request and GEOVIA GEMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Seequent Central or GEOVIA GEMS?
Seequent Central starts at On request and GEOVIA GEMS at On request.
Does Seequent Central or GEOVIA GEMS run on more platforms?
Seequent Central runs on Cloud, Windows. GEOVIA GEMS runs on Windows.
What is Seequent Central best used for?
Seequent Central is most often used for centralised version control and audit trails for geological models, shared 3d visualisation of leapfrog and oasis montaj models across distributed teams, project branching for scenario modelling, mining exploration and geothermal project coordination. Of those, centralised version control and audit trails for geological models and shared 3d visualisation of leapfrog and oasis montaj models across distributed teams are not what GEOVIA GEMS is typically brought in for.
What can Seequent Central do that GEOVIA GEMS cannot?
Seequent Central covers Version control, Model publishing, Data management, Audit trails. GEOVIA GEMS covers Geological modeling, Multi-element analysis, Resource estimation, Mine planning. Both handle Windows support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Seequent Central

More on GEOVIA GEMS

Keep looking

Other head to heads