Softwr

Energy · head to head

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure vs VerneMQ

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure logo

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

Energy

IoT-enabled, open, interoperable architecture and platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
VerneMQ logo

VerneMQ

Databases

Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only VerneMQ has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • They diverge on capability: Schneider Electric EcoStruxure covers IoT connectivity, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Schneider Electric EcoStruxure and VerneMQ actually diverge.

Attributes where Schneider Electric EcoStruxure and VerneMQ differ
AttributeSchneider Electric EcoStruxureVerneMQ
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, Mobile, On-premise, ApiLinux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes
CategoryEnergyDatabases
Founded1836Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

  • IoT connectivity
  • Real-time analytics
  • Energy monitoring
  • Predictive maintenance
  • Asset management
  • Building automation
  • Power management
  • Sustainability tracking

Only in VerneMQ

  • Erlang/OTP clustering
  • MQTT 5.0 support
  • Plugin system
  • Backpressure handling
  • Bridge support
  • Metrics export
  • MQTT over WebSockets
  • Pluggable auth backends

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

  • Building energy managementnot VerneMQ
  • Smart grid operationsnot VerneMQ
  • Industrial automationnot VerneMQ
  • Data center efficiencynot VerneMQ
  • Sustainability reportingnot VerneMQ

VerneMQ

  • An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
  • A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
  • A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
  • An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

Nothing recorded yet. See the Schneider Electric EcoStruxure review.

VerneMQ

  • The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
  • Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
  • There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
  • Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
  • There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.

Pricing, plan by plan

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

On request
  • Building$undefined/custom
    • Building management
    • Energy optimization
    • HVAC control
  • Grid$undefined/custom
    • Grid management
    • Distribution automation
    • Outage management
  • Industry$undefined/custom
    • Industrial automation
    • Process optimization
    • Predictive maintenance

VerneMQ

Free
  • Source buildFree
    • Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
    • Full clustering and plugin capability
    • You compile and package it yourself
  • Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
    • Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
    • Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
    • Official builds and Docker images
  • Commercial support$undefined/year
    • Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
    • Custom development
    • Long-term maintenance agreements

Which should you pick?

Choose Schneider Electric EcoStruxure if

  • You need iot connectivity.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, On-premise, Api.
  • You also want real-time analytics.
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure review

Choose VerneMQ if

  • You need erlang/otp clustering.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
  • You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
VerneMQ review

Questions people ask

Is Schneider Electric EcoStruxure or VerneMQ better?
Neither clearly leads. Schneider Electric EcoStruxure starts at On request and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure or VerneMQ?
VerneMQ has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Schneider Electric EcoStruxure and Free for VerneMQ.
Does Schneider Electric EcoStruxure or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure runs on Web, Mobile, On-premise, Api. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
Can I use VerneMQ for free?
Yes. VerneMQ has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Schneider Electric EcoStruxure starts at On request.
What is Schneider Electric EcoStruxure best used for?
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure is most often used for building energy management, smart grid operations, industrial automation, data center efficiency. Of those, building energy management and smart grid operations are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
What can Schneider Electric EcoStruxure do that VerneMQ cannot?
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure covers IoT connectivity, Real-time analytics, Energy monitoring, Predictive maintenance. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

VerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?

The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.

VerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?

Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.

VerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?

No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.

VerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?

Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.

Share

Related pages

More on Schneider Electric EcoStruxure

More on VerneMQ

Keep looking

Other head to heads