Softwr

Web Development · head to head

Ruby on Rails vs Steampipe

Ruby on Rails logo

Ruby on Rails

Web Development

A full-stack framework for building web applications

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
Steampipe logo

Steampipe

Developer Tools

Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Ruby on Rails licensed under the MIT License per rubyonrails.org; as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Ruby on Rails and Steampipe actually diverge.

Attributes where Ruby on Rails and Steampipe differ
AttributeRuby on RailsSteampipe
Pricing modelopen-sourceOpen source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes
PlatformsWebmacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web
CategoryWeb DevelopmentDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Ruby on Rails

Nothing recorded that Steampipe does not also cover.

Only in Steampipe

  • SQL over live APIs
  • Wide plugin set
  • Embedded Postgres
  • Compliance benchmarks
  • Joins across providers
  • Hosted option

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Ruby on Rails

  • Building e-commerce platforms that scale from startup to IPOnot Steampipe
  • Developing SaaS applications with consistent conventions across teamsnot Steampipe
  • Creating marketplace platforms like Airbnb with transactional workflowsnot Steampipe
  • Integrating cloud file storage and real-time WebSocket updatesnot Steampipe
  • Enforcing encryption and security protections against common attacksnot Steampipe

Steampipe

  • Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Ruby on Rails
  • Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Ruby on Rails
  • Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Ruby on Rails
  • Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Ruby on Rails

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Ruby on Rails

  • Licensed under the MIT License per rubyonrails.org; as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare
  • The framework is Ruby-only by design, per rubyonrails.org's own description of its convention over configuration approach, requiring the Ruby runtime rather than supporting alternate languages

Steampipe

  • AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
  • Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
  • The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
  • Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.

Pricing, plan by plan

Ruby on Rails

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Ruby on Rails review.

Steampipe

Free
  • Steampipe CLIFree
    • AGPL-3.0
    • All plugins
    • No user or query limits
  • Pipes DeveloperFree
    • One user
    • 400 compute minutes
    • 3GB storage
  • Pipes Team$49/month
    • Three users
    • 2,000 compute minutes
    • 20GB storage
  • Pipes Enterprise$249/month
    • Three users
    • 10,000 compute minutes
    • 100GB storage

Which should you pick?

Choose Ruby on Rails if

  • You want to start without paying.
Ruby on Rails review

Choose Steampipe if

  • You need sql over live apis.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
  • You also want wide plugin set.
Steampipe review

Questions people ask

Is Ruby on Rails or Steampipe better?
Neither clearly leads. Ruby on Rails starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Ruby on Rails or Steampipe?
Ruby on Rails starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
Does Ruby on Rails or Steampipe run on more platforms?
Ruby on Rails runs on Web. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
Can I use Ruby on Rails for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Ruby on Rails best used for?
Ruby on Rails is most often used for building e-commerce platforms that scale from startup to ipo, developing saas applications with consistent conventions across teams, creating marketplace platforms like airbnb with transactional workflows, integrating cloud file storage and real-time websocket updates. Of those, building e-commerce platforms that scale from startup to ipo and developing saas applications with consistent conventions across teams are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
What can Ruby on Rails do that Steampipe cannot?
Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Ruby on Rails: Is Ruby on Rails free?

Yes, Ruby on Rails is free and open-source, licensed under the MIT License. There are no costs associated with using or distributing the framework.

Source
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?

May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.

Ruby on Rails: What is Ruby on Rails licensed under?

Ruby on Rails is licensed under the MIT License, a permissive open-source license that allows commercial and private use.

Source
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?

Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.

Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?

Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.

Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?

Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.

Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?

It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.

Share

Related pages

More on Ruby on Rails

More on Steampipe

Keep looking

Other head to heads