Manufacturing · head to head
Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Rootstock

Rockwell FactoryTalk
Manufacturing
Rockwell Automation software portfolio for HMI, historian, analytics and industrial data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Rootstock
ERP
Manufacturing ERP built natively on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Rockwell FactoryTalk factoryTalk is a brand, not a product, so a quote that says FactoryTalk may cover any of six separately licensed things; buyers repeatedly find that the demo they saw needed View plus Historian plus a Hub subscription.; Rootstock every Rootstock user also needs a paid Salesforce platform licence, so the true cost is two subscriptions stacked; third-party estimates put a fully loaded seat around 200 to 500 US dollars per user per month, which is far above the Rootstock line item alone.
- They diverge on capability: Rockwell FactoryTalk covers FactoryTalk View SE and ME, Rootstock covers Native Salesforce architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Rockwell FactoryTalk and Rootstock actually diverge.
| Attribute | Rockwell FactoryTalk | Rootstock |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web, Cloud | Web, Salesforce Platform, iOS, Android |
| Category | Manufacturing | ERP |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Rockwell FactoryTalk
- FactoryTalk View SE and ME
- FactoryTalk Historian
- FactoryTalk Optix
- FactoryTalk Batch
- FactoryTalk Hub
- Native Logix tags
Only in Rootstock
- Native Salesforce architecture
- Production and work orders
- Materials and MRP
- Inventory management
- Order to cash
- Project accounting
- Financials
- Quality and compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Rockwell FactoryTalk
- A plant standardised on ControlLogix that needs supervisory HMI without building and maintaining an OPC layer between controller and screennot Rootstock
- A hybrid manufacturer needing ISA-88 batch execution audited against recipes, where FactoryTalk Batch is already validated in the industrynot Rootstock
- Consolidating machine-level HMI screens across many Allen-Bradley lines under one tag model and one alarm schemenot Rootstock
- Adding a plant historian quickly where the site has Rockwell distribution support but no PI administrator on staffnot Rootstock
Rootstock
- A discrete manufacturer already running Salesforce Sales Cloud that wants configured quotes to become works orders without an integration layer between two systemsnot Rockwell FactoryTalk
- An engineer-to-order equipment maker that needs project cost tracking and CRM opportunity data in one database for margin reportingnot Rockwell FactoryTalk
- A medical device supplier that needs lot and serial traceability under the same security and audit model as its customer recordsnot Rockwell FactoryTalk
- A manufacturer replacing an on-premise ERP whose IT team wants to stop maintaining servers and standardise administration on a platform it already supportsnot Rockwell FactoryTalk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Rockwell FactoryTalk
- FactoryTalk is a brand, not a product, so a quote that says FactoryTalk may cover any of six separately licensed things; buyers repeatedly find that the demo they saw needed View plus Historian plus a Hub subscription.
- Licensing units differ per product, tags for Historian, display tags and clients for View, another scheme for Optix, which makes forecasting the cost of a plant expansion genuinely hard.
- The migration of products onto FactoryTalk Hub subscriptions converts what used to be a perpetual licence into an annual payment where lapsing stops the software, changing a capital purchase into an operating one you cannot exit.
- Value drops sharply outside an Allen-Bradley estate; against a Siemens or Mitsubishi PLC you are back to OPC UA and lose the main reason to buy FactoryTalk at all.
- There is no public price list and buying is through distribution, so two plants of identical size in the same company can pay materially different amounts depending on when and how they negotiated.
Rootstock
- Every Rootstock user also needs a paid Salesforce platform licence, so the true cost is two subscriptions stacked; third-party estimates put a fully loaded seat around 200 to 500 US dollars per user per month, which is far above the Rootstock line item alone.
- Rootstock publishes no pricing whatsoever, so budget-setting depends on reseller and analyst figures rather than vendor rates, and there is no public benchmark to test a quote against.
- Building on Salesforce means inheriting Salesforce governor limits and API constraints, which surface as batch size and data volume ceilings in high-transaction manufacturing that a purpose-built ERP would not hit.
- Your ERP is now hostage to another vendors commercial decisions: Salesforce list price rises, edition changes or licence policy shifts flow straight into your ERP running cost with no alternative supplier.
- Implementation is a serious project, commonly quoted in the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars and measured in months, and the partner pool that genuinely knows both manufacturing and Salesforce-native ERP is small, which lengthens timelines and raises day rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Rockwell FactoryTalk
On request- FactoryTalk$undefined/year
- Sold through Rockwell distribution, not direct or self-service
- View licensed by display tag count and client seats
- Historian licensed by tag count
Rootstock
On request- Rootstock Cloud ERP$undefined/year
- Manufacturing, inventory and supply chain modules
- Runs as a managed package on the Salesforce Platform
- Salesforce platform licences purchased separately for every user
Which should you pick?
Choose Rockwell FactoryTalk if
- You need factorytalk view se and me.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web, Cloud.
- You also want factorytalk historian.
Choose Rootstock if
- You need native salesforce architecture.
- You work on Web, Salesforce Platform, iOS, Android.
- You also want production and work orders.
Questions people ask
- Is Rockwell FactoryTalk or Rootstock better?
- Neither clearly leads. Rockwell FactoryTalk starts at On request and Rootstock at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Rockwell FactoryTalk or Rootstock?
- Rockwell FactoryTalk starts at On request and Rootstock at On request.
- Does Rockwell FactoryTalk or Rootstock run on more platforms?
- Rockwell FactoryTalk runs on Windows, Linux, Web, Cloud. Rootstock runs on Web, Salesforce Platform, iOS, Android.
- What is Rockwell FactoryTalk best used for?
- Rockwell FactoryTalk is most often used for a plant standardised on controllogix that needs supervisory hmi without building and maintaining an opc layer between controller and screen, a hybrid manufacturer needing isa-88 batch execution audited against recipes, where factorytalk batch is already validated in the industry, consolidating machine-level hmi screens across many allen-bradley lines under one tag model and one alarm scheme, adding a plant historian quickly where the site has rockwell distribution support but no pi administrator on staff. Of those, a plant standardised on controllogix that needs supervisory hmi without building and maintaining an opc layer between controller and screen and a hybrid manufacturer needing isa-88 batch execution audited against recipes, where factorytalk batch is already validated in the industry are not what Rootstock is typically brought in for.
- What can Rockwell FactoryTalk do that Rootstock cannot?
- Rockwell FactoryTalk covers FactoryTalk View SE and ME, FactoryTalk Historian, FactoryTalk Optix, FactoryTalk Batch. Rootstock covers Native Salesforce architecture, Production and work orders, Materials and MRP, Inventory management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Rockwell FactoryTalk: Is FactoryTalk Historian the same as AVEVA PI?
It is built on the PI engine under an OEM arrangement, tuned for Rockwell integration. If you already run PI enterprise-wide, buying Historian too usually duplicates a system you have.
Rootstock: Do I need Salesforce to run Rootstock?
Yes, and it is not optional. Rootstock is a managed package on the Salesforce Platform and every user requires a Salesforce licence in addition to the Rootstock subscription.
Rockwell FactoryTalk: Can I still buy FactoryTalk perpetually?
Some products yes, but the direction is toward FactoryTalk Hub subscriptions. Confirm per product before assuming a capital purchase is available.
Rootstock: What does Rootstock actually cost?
Rootstock does not publish rates. Third-party estimates put the ERP subscription at roughly 150 to 300 US dollars per user per month before Salesforce licences, with implementation quoted separately.
Rockwell FactoryTalk: Does FactoryTalk work with non-Rockwell PLCs?
Yes, through OPC UA and drivers, but the native tag browse advantage disappears and the case for FactoryTalk over a cheaper independent SCADA weakens.
Rootstock: Is it suitable for process manufacturing?
It is built for discrete manufacturing. Recipe and batch-driven process manufacturers are a poor fit and should look elsewhere.
Rockwell FactoryTalk: Where do I find pricing?
You cannot without a distributor. Rockwell publishes no list pricing for the FactoryTalk portfolio.
Rootstock: Has Rootstock been acquired?
No. Rootstock remains independent and was itself the acquirer, buying Salesforce-native applications firm Ascent Solutions in March 2026.
Related pages
More on Rockwell FactoryTalk
Other head to heads
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Ignition
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Tulip
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs AVEVA System Platform
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Seeq
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs GENESIS Version 11
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Litmus Edge
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Fusion 360
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Flow Software
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Materialise Magics
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Propel
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Duro PLM
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Dyndrite
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Erbessd Instruments
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Fictiv
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Epicor
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs NetSuite
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Katana MRP
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs MRPeasy
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Global Shop Solutions
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs IQMS
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs iDempiere
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs IFS Cloud
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs QAD
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs SYSPRO
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Aptean
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Omnea
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs Sage X3
- Rockwell FactoryTalk vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Rootstock vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Rootstock vs Ignition
- Rootstock vs Tulip
- Rootstock vs AVEVA System Platform
- Rootstock vs Seeq
- Rootstock vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Rootstock vs GENESIS Version 11
- Rootstock vs Litmus Edge
- Rootstock vs Fusion 360
- Rootstock vs Flow Software
- Rootstock vs Materialise Magics
- Rootstock vs Propel
- Rootstock vs Duro PLM
- Rootstock vs Dyndrite
- Rootstock vs Erbessd Instruments
- Rootstock vs Fictiv
- Rootstock vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Rootstock vs Epicor
- Rootstock vs NetSuite
- Rootstock vs Katana MRP
- Rootstock vs MRPeasy
- Rootstock vs Global Shop Solutions
- Rootstock vs IQMS
- Rootstock vs iDempiere
- Rootstock vs IFS Cloud
- Rootstock vs QAD
- Rootstock vs SYSPRO
- Rootstock vs Aptean
- Rootstock vs Omnea
- Rootstock vs Sage X3
- Rootstock vs QAD Adaptive ERP
