Cybersecurity · head to head
Rhombus Systems vs Veracode

Rhombus Systems
Cybersecurity
Cloud-managed cameras, sensors and access control with a per-camera annual licence
- From
- $149/year
- Rated
- -

Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Rhombus Systems the per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Rhombus Systems and Veracode actually diverge.
| Attribute | Rhombus Systems | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $149/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per camera per year licence plus hardware | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | web, api |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Rhombus Systems
- On-camera storage
- No NVR or server
- AI search
- Access control
- Environmental sensors
- Unlimited users
- Ten year hardware warranty
- Optional cloud archiving
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Rhombus Systems
- A school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local IT at each sitenot Veracode
- A clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trailnot Veracode
- A logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footagenot Veracode
- An office estate replacing ageing NVRs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain themnot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot Rhombus Systems
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot Rhombus Systems
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot Rhombus Systems
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot Rhombus Systems
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot Rhombus Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Rhombus Systems
- The per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- Cameras must be Rhombus, so there is no reuse of existing IP cameras and migrating away means replacing every device rather than changing software.
- Cloud archiving is priced separately by retention and stream count, and long retention on multisensor cameras runs into five figures per camera, which can dwarf everything else in the quote.
- On-camera storage is the default retention, so a camera physically stolen or destroyed takes its unarchived footage with it unless cloud archiving was paid for on that camera.
- Analytics and integrations are good for mid-market needs but shallower than a dedicated enterprise VMS with a large third-party ecosystem, so specialist requirements like advanced LPR or forensic search hit limits.
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
Rhombus Systems
$149/year- Professional$149/year
- Per camera per year
- Cloud console and management
- On-camera storage retention
- Enterprise$199/year
- Per camera per year
- Everything in Professional
- Flexible cloud archiving options
- Cloud archiving$undefined/year
- Priced separately by retention period and stream count
- Multisensor cameras cost several times a single sensor camera
- Long retention on multisensor models can reach five figures per camera
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Rhombus Systems if
- You need on-camera storage.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no nvr or server.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is Rhombus Systems or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Rhombus Systems starts at $149/year and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Rhombus Systems or Veracode?
- Rhombus Systems starts at $149/year and Veracode at On request.
- Does Rhombus Systems or Veracode run on more platforms?
- Rhombus Systems runs on Web, iOS, Android. Veracode runs on web, api.
- What is Rhombus Systems best used for?
- Rhombus Systems is most often used for a school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local it at each site, a clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trail, a logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footage, an office estate replacing ageing nvrs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain them. Of those, a school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local it at each site and a clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trail are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can Rhombus Systems do that Veracode cannot?
- Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, No NVR or server, AI search, Access control. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Rhombus Systems: Do I need an NVR or a server?
No. Cameras record on board and connect directly to the cloud console, which is the main operational reason organisations pick it.
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceRhombus Systems: What does the licence cost?
Roughly $149 per camera per year for Professional and about $199 for Enterprise, typically sold in one, three, five or ten year terms.
Veracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceRhombus Systems: Is cloud storage included?
No. On-camera storage is the default. Cloud archiving is a separate charge priced by retention duration and number of streams.
Rhombus Systems: Can I use my existing cameras?
No. The platform works only with Rhombus hardware, which is the trade-off for the zero-server architecture.
Related pages
More on Rhombus Systems
Other head to heads
- Rhombus Systems vs Spot AI
- Rhombus Systems vs Salient CompleteView
- Rhombus Systems vs Milestone XProtect
- Rhombus Systems vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Rhombus Systems vs DTiQ
- Rhombus Systems vs Motorola Vigilant
- Rhombus Systems vs Genetec Security Center
- Rhombus Systems vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Camio
- Rhombus Systems vs Dahua Technology
- Rhombus Systems vs March Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Envysion
- Rhombus Systems vs Avast One
- Rhombus Systems vs Chainguard
- Rhombus Systems vs Cosign
- Rhombus Systems vs CyberGhost VPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Descope
- Rhombus Systems vs Semgrep
- Rhombus Systems vs Legit Security
- Rhombus Systems vs Aikido
- Rhombus Systems vs Snyk
- Rhombus Systems vs Endor Labs
- Rhombus Systems vs Tenable
- Rhombus Systems vs Acunetix
- Rhombus Systems vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Rhombus Systems vs Recorded Future
- Rhombus Systems vs Tanium
- Rhombus Systems vs Trivy
- Rhombus Systems vs Grype
- Rhombus Systems vs Quantexa
- Rhombus Systems vs Termly
- Rhombus Systems vs Transcend
- Rhombus Systems vs WireGuard
- Rhombus Systems vs Akeyless
- Rhombus Systems vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs Spot AI
- Veracode vs Salient CompleteView
- Veracode vs Milestone XProtect
- Veracode vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Veracode vs DTiQ
- Veracode vs Motorola Vigilant
- Veracode vs Genetec Security Center
- Veracode vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Veracode vs Camio
- Veracode vs Dahua Technology
- Veracode vs March Networks
- Veracode vs Envysion
- Veracode vs Avast One
- Veracode vs Chainguard
- Veracode vs Cosign
- Veracode vs CyberGhost VPN
- Veracode vs Descope
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail
