Softwr

Machine Learning & Data Science · head to head

Amazon Redshift ML vs H2O.ai

Amazon Redshift ML logo

Amazon Redshift ML

Machine Learning & Data Science

Create machine learning models using SQL

From
Free
Rated
-
H2O.ai logo

H2O.ai

Machine Learning & Data Science

AI Cloud for building and deploying AI applications

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift ML free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million; H2O.ai java is always required to run H2O-3 even when working from R or Python, and only a 64-bit JRE or JDK is supported
  • They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, H2O.ai covers Distributed computing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift ML and H2O.ai actually diverge.

Attributes where Amazon Redshift ML and H2O.ai differ
AttributeAmazon Redshift MLH2O.ai
Pricing modelusage-basedfreemium
PlatformsWebWeb, Cloud
Founded20062011

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning & Data Science).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Amazon Redshift ML

  • SQL-based ML
  • SageMaker integration
  • BYOM support
  • In-database predictions
  • Amazon Redshift
  • SageMaker
  • S3
  • Glue

Only in H2O.ai

  • Distributed computing
  • Feature engineering
  • Model explainability
  • Time series forecasting
  • Spark
  • Hadoop
  • Python
  • R

Both cover

  • AutoML
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Training and running machine learning models directly from SQL inside Amazon Redshiftnot H2O.ai

H2O.ai

  • Distributed in-memory machine learning over large datasetsnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Training and productionising models from R or Python against a shared H2O clusternot Amazon Redshift ML

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million

H2O.ai

  • Java is always required to run H2O-3 even when working from R or Python, and only a 64-bit JRE or JDK is supported
  • Supported Java versions stop at Java SE 17; newer versions only run by forcing an unsupported version flag and are guaranteed for experiments rather than production
  • H2O-3 only supports numpy below version 2, so a numpy 2 environment must be downgraded
  • Supported Python versions are limited to 3.7 through 3.11
  • The Flow web UI requires an internet browser and is the only graphical interface

Pricing, plan by plan

Amazon Redshift ML

Free
  • Free TrialFree
    • 2-month trial
    • 750 DC2.Large hours
  • On-Demand$0.25/hour
    • Per-node pricing
    • SageMaker training

H2O.ai

Free
  • H2O-3 Open SourceFree
    • Core algorithms
    • AutoML
    • Community support
  • Driverless AIFree
    • Automatic feature engineering
    • Model explainability
    • Enterprise support

Which should you pick?

Choose Amazon Redshift ML if

  • You need sql-based ml.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want sagemaker integration.

Choose H2O.ai if

  • You need distributed computing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want feature engineering.

Questions people ask

Is Amazon Redshift ML or H2O.ai better?
Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and H2O.ai at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift ML or H2O.ai?
Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and H2O.ai at Free.
Does Amazon Redshift ML or H2O.ai run on more platforms?
Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web. H2O.ai runs on Web, Cloud.
Can I use Amazon Redshift ML for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Amazon Redshift ML best used for?
Amazon Redshift ML is most often used for training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift. Of those, training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift is not what H2O.ai is typically brought in for.
What can Amazon Redshift ML do that H2O.ai cannot?
Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, SageMaker integration, BYOM support, In-database predictions. H2O.ai covers Distributed computing, Feature engineering, Model explainability, Time series forecasting. Both handle AutoML, Web support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

H2O.ai: Is H2O open source and free?

Yes. H2O-3 OSS is free and Apache-licensed, designed for self-managed and experimental workflows. H2O.ai also offers enterprise cloud solutions with additional features.

Source
H2O.ai: How many companies use H2O's open source platform?

Over 18,000 companies across Finance, Insurance, Healthcare, Retail, Telco, Sales, and Marketing use H2O's open-source machine learning platform.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads