Machine Learning & Data Science · head to head
Amazon Redshift ML vs DVC

Amazon Redshift ML
Machine Learning & Data Science
Create machine learning models using SQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

DVC
Machine Learning & Data Science
Data version control for machine learning projects
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift ML free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million; DVC dVC is Apache 2.0 licensed open source with no enterprise tier or paid support offering documented in the project itself; teams needing SLA-backed support get nothing from the DVC project directly.
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, DVC covers Data versioning.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift ML and DVC actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift ML | DVC |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Founded | 2006 | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning & Data Science).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML
- SageMaker integration
- BYOM support
- In-database predictions
- Amazon Redshift
- SageMaker
- Glue
Only in DVC
- Data versioning
- Pipeline management
- Experiment tracking
- Remote storage
- Git integration
- Git
- Azure Blob
- Google Cloud Storage
Both cover
- S3
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training and running machine learning models directly from SQL inside Amazon Redshiftnot DVC
DVC
- Machine learningnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Data analysisnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Model trainingnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Predictive analyticsnot Amazon Redshift ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million
DVC
- DVC is Apache 2.0 licensed open source with no enterprise tier or paid support offering documented in the project itself; teams needing SLA-backed support get nothing from the DVC project directly.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
DVC
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data versioning
- Pipeline management
- Experiment tracking
- DVC StudioFree
- Web UI
- Team collaboration
- Visualizations
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl.
Choose DVC if
- You need data versioning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want pipeline management.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift ML or DVC better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and DVC at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift ML or DVC?
- Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and DVC at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift ML or DVC run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web. DVC runs on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift ML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift ML best used for?
- Amazon Redshift ML is most often used for training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift. Of those, training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift is not what DVC is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift ML do that DVC cannot?
- Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML, SageMaker integration, BYOM support. DVC covers Data versioning, Pipeline management, Experiment tracking, Remote storage. Both handle S3.
Related pages
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift ML vs AWS SageMaker
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Snowflake
- Amazon Redshift ML vs TensorFlow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Comet ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Keras
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MLflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Jupyter
- Amazon Redshift ML vs PyTorch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weights & Biases
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Alteryx
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Anaconda
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Dataiku
- DVC vs AWS SageMaker
- DVC vs Google Vertex AI
- DVC vs Azure Machine Learning
- DVC vs DataRobot
- DVC vs Snowflake
- DVC vs TensorFlow
- DVC vs Comet ML
- DVC vs Keras
- DVC vs MLflow
- DVC vs Jupyter
- DVC vs PyTorch
- DVC vs scikit-learn
- DVC vs Apache Spark MLlib
- DVC vs Weights & Biases
- DVC vs Alteryx
- DVC vs Anaconda
- DVC vs Databricks
- DVC vs Dataiku
