Machine Learning & Data Science · head to head
Amazon Redshift ML vs BentoML

Amazon Redshift ML
Machine Learning & Data Science
Create machine learning models using SQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

BentoML
Machine Learning & Data Science
Build production-ready ML applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift ML free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million; BentoML core BentoML framework is Apache 2.0 and free, but the managed BentoCloud enterprise tier has no published pricing: the README instructs buyers to sign up for personal access or contact sales for enterprise use, with no rate card shown.
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, BentoML covers Model packaging.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift ML and BentoML actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift ML | BentoML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Founded | 2006 | 2019 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning & Data Science).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML
- SageMaker integration
- BYOM support
- In-database predictions
- Amazon Redshift
- SageMaker
- S3
Only in BentoML
- Model packaging
- REST API generation
- Adaptive batching
- Multi-framework support
- Container deployment
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- scikit-learn
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training and running machine learning models directly from SQL inside Amazon Redshiftnot BentoML
BentoML
- Machine learningnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Data analysisnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Model trainingnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Predictive analyticsnot Amazon Redshift ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million
BentoML
- Core BentoML framework is Apache 2.0 and free, but the managed BentoCloud enterprise tier has no published pricing: the README instructs buyers to sign up for personal access or contact sales for enterprise use, with no rate card shown.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
BentoML
Free- Open SourceFree
- Model packaging
- API creation
- Local serving
- BentoCloudFree
- Managed deployment
- Auto-scaling
- Monitoring
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl.
Choose BentoML if
- You need model packaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want rest api generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift ML or BentoML better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and BentoML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift ML or BentoML?
- Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and BentoML at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift ML or BentoML run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web. BentoML runs on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift ML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift ML best used for?
- Amazon Redshift ML is most often used for training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift. Of those, training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift is not what BentoML is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift ML do that BentoML cannot?
- Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML, SageMaker integration, BYOM support. BentoML covers Model packaging, REST API generation, Adaptive batching, Multi-framework support.
Related pages
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift ML vs AWS SageMaker
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Snowflake
- Amazon Redshift ML vs TensorFlow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Comet ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Keras
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MLflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Jupyter
- Amazon Redshift ML vs PyTorch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weights & Biases
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Alteryx
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Anaconda
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Dataiku
- BentoML vs AWS SageMaker
- BentoML vs Google Vertex AI
- BentoML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BentoML vs DataRobot
- BentoML vs Snowflake
- BentoML vs TensorFlow
- BentoML vs Comet ML
- BentoML vs Keras
- BentoML vs MLflow
- BentoML vs Jupyter
- BentoML vs PyTorch
- BentoML vs scikit-learn
- BentoML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BentoML vs Weights & Biases
- BentoML vs Alteryx
- BentoML vs Anaconda
- BentoML vs Databricks
- BentoML vs Dataiku
