Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

Azure Machine Learning vs Amazon Redshift ML

Azure Machine Learning logo

Azure Machine Learning

Machine Learning

Microsoft's managed platform for training, tracking and deploying models on Azure

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Amazon Redshift ML logo

Amazon Redshift ML

Machine Learning

SQL statements in Redshift that train models on SageMaker and return them as functions

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Azure Machine Learning managed online endpoints are billed per underlying virtual machine for as long as the deployment exists, with no scale to zero, so a model answering a handful of requests a day costs the same as one answering thousands.; Amazon Redshift ML training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
  • They diverge on capability: Azure Machine Learning covers Workspace, Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Azure Machine Learning and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.

Attributes where Azure Machine Learning and Amazon Redshift ML differ
AttributeAzure Machine LearningAmazon Redshift ML
PlatformsAzure CloudWeb
Founded19752006

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Azure Machine Learning

  • Workspace
  • Compute clusters
  • MLflow-compatible tracking
  • Model registry
  • Managed online endpoints
  • Batch endpoints
  • Automated machine learning
  • Pipelines

Only in Amazon Redshift ML

  • CREATE MODEL in SQL
  • Automatic model selection
  • Local inference
  • Bring your own model
  • Algorithm selection
  • Cost ceiling controls
  • Existing warehouse security
  • Batch and interactive scoring

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Azure Machine Learning

  • Enterprises standardised on Azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance reviewnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Training that needs to burst onto a GPU cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwardsnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Regulated workloads that must stay inside a virtual network with private endpoints and auditable role-based accessnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Teams already using MLflow who want the tracking interface they know backed by a managed service and enterprise identitynot Amazon Redshift ML

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Adding a churn or propensity score to an existing dashboard where the data is already in Redshift and nobody needs a bespoke modelnot Azure Machine Learning
  • Letting an analytics team test whether a predictive column has any business value before asking for data science headcountnot Azure Machine Learning
  • Scoring rows inside a SQL pipeline where moving data out to a separate service would add fragility for little benefitnot Azure Machine Learning
  • Organisations committed to AWS whose main constraint is a data science backlog rather than modelling sophisticationnot Azure Machine Learning

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Azure Machine Learning

  • Managed online endpoints are billed per underlying virtual machine for as long as the deployment exists, with no scale to zero, so a model answering a handful of requests a day costs the same as one answering thousands.
  • GPU capacity is governed by per-region, per-family quota that must be requested and approved, so a training plan can be blocked by an administrative ticket rather than by budget, and the newest accelerators are often unavailable in the region your data is required to stay in.
  • The v2 Python SDK and command line use a different object model from v1 and code, pipelines and examples written for v1 do not port mechanically, which has left teams maintaining two ways of doing the same thing and searching documentation that mixes both.
  • The workspace binds storage, key vault, container registry and compute together, so recreating or moving one is not a light operation, and configuring it properly with private endpoints and a managed virtual network is a multi-day job for somebody who already knows Azure networking.
  • Experiment history, registered models, environments, endpoints and pipeline definitions live inside the workspace, and although the tracking interface is MLflow-compatible, moving the accumulated lineage and orchestration elsewhere is a rebuild, so the cost of leaving grows every month the team uses it.

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
  • Autopilot searches many candidate models by default and the duration and cost of CREATE MODEL scale with the data size and the MAX_CELLS setting, so an unconstrained statement against a large table is an expensive accident rather than an experiment.
  • Local inference runs on the Redshift cluster itself, so scoring millions of rows competes for the resources the warehouse exists to provide, and the remote inference alternative adds a per-batch network call plus an hourly SageMaker endpoint charge that persists whether or not anyone queries it.
  • The supported problem types are limited to what the exposed algorithms cover, so anything involving text, images, sequences, a custom loss function or a bespoke evaluation metric is out of scope and has to be built conventionally.
  • There is no retraining schedule, drift detection or model registry, so a model created by a statement stays exactly as trained until somebody remembers to recreate it, and nothing in the warehouse will report that its accuracy has decayed.

Pricing, plan by plan

Azure Machine Learning

Free
  • Free TierFree
    • Limited compute
    • Basic features
  • Pay-as-you-go$0.05/hour
    • Full platform
    • All compute options
    • Enterprise features

Amazon Redshift ML

Free
  • Free TrialFree
    • 2-month trial
    • 750 DC2.Large hours
  • On-Demand$0.25/hour
    • Per-node pricing
    • SageMaker training

Which should you pick?

Choose Azure Machine Learning if

  • You need workspace.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Azure Cloud.
  • You also want compute clusters.
Azure Machine Learning review

Choose Amazon Redshift ML if

  • You need create model in sql.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want automatic model selection.
Amazon Redshift ML review

Questions people ask

Is Azure Machine Learning or Amazon Redshift ML better?
Neither clearly leads. Azure Machine Learning starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Azure Machine Learning or Amazon Redshift ML?
Azure Machine Learning starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free.
Does Azure Machine Learning or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
Azure Machine Learning runs on Azure Cloud. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
Can I use Azure Machine Learning for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Azure Machine Learning best used for?
Azure Machine Learning is most often used for enterprises standardised on azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance review, training that needs to burst onto a gpu cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwards, regulated workloads that must stay inside a virtual network with private endpoints and auditable role-based access, teams already using mlflow who want the tracking interface they know backed by a managed service and enterprise identity. Of those, enterprises standardised on azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance review and training that needs to burst onto a gpu cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwards are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
What can Azure Machine Learning do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
Azure Machine Learning covers Workspace, Compute clusters, MLflow-compatible tracking, Model registry. Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL, Automatic model selection, Local inference, Bring your own model.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Azure Machine Learning: Is there a charge for the workspace itself?

No charge for the workspace resource. You pay for the compute it runs, the storage it uses, the container registry, key vault and any endpoints left running, which is where essentially the whole bill comes from.

Amazon Redshift ML: Does it require SageMaker?

Yes. Redshift ML is an interface; the training happens in SageMaker and needs an IAM role and an S3 bucket for the intermediate data.

Azure Machine Learning: Does it work with MLflow?

Yes. The tracking interface is MLflow-compatible, so existing logging code generally works unchanged, and that compatibility is the least locked-in part of the platform.

Amazon Redshift ML: Is there an extra charge?

The SQL interface is part of Redshift, but the training runs as a SageMaker job charged at SageMaker rates, and a remote inference endpoint is billed for as long as it exists.

Azure Machine Learning: What is the difference between SDK v1 and v2?

A different object model and a different way of expressing jobs, components and endpoints. v2 is the current one. v1 code does not translate mechanically and a lot of material found online still assumes v1, which is a common source of wasted time.

Amazon Redshift ML: What kinds of model can it build?

Regression, binary and multiclass classification through the automatic path, plus direct use of XGBoost, linear learner, multilayer perceptron and K-means. Anything beyond structured tabular prediction is out of scope.

Azure Machine Learning: Do endpoints scale to zero?

Managed online endpoints do not; they hold their virtual machines. Batch endpoints only consume compute while a job runs, so intermittent workloads are much cheaper served as batch where the use case allows it.

Amazon Redshift ML: Can I use a model I trained myself?

Yes, through the bring-your-own-model path, either compiled into the cluster for local inference or called as a remote SageMaker endpoint.

Azure Machine Learning: Do I need an ML engineer to run it?

For the data science work, not necessarily. For the workspace itself, yes, somebody has to understand Azure identity, networking, quota and cost management, and on teams without that person the platform becomes the bottleneck rather than the model.

Amazon Redshift ML: Does it retrain automatically?

No. Retraining means running CREATE MODEL again, on a schedule you build yourself, and nothing in the product monitors whether it is needed.

Share

Related pages

More on Azure Machine Learning

More on Amazon Redshift ML

Keep looking

Other head to heads