Machine Learning · head to head
Anaconda vs Amazon Redshift ML

Anaconda
Machine Learning
The world's most popular data science platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Amazon Redshift ML
Machine Learning
SQL statements in Redshift that train models on SageMaker and return them as functions
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Anaconda dependency resolution slower than pip due to SAT solver complexity; Amazon Redshift ML training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
- They diverge on capability: Anaconda covers Conda package manager, Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Anaconda and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.
| Attribute | Anaconda | Amazon Redshift ML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web/Cloud | Web |
| Founded | 2012 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Anaconda
- Conda package manager
- Environment management
- 1500+ packages
- Navigator GUI
- Cross-platform support
- Jupyter
- VS Code
- PyCharm
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- CREATE MODEL in SQL
- Automatic model selection
- Local inference
- Bring your own model
- Algorithm selection
- Cost ceiling controls
- Existing warehouse security
- Batch and interactive scoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Anaconda
- Machine learningnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Data analysisnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Model trainingnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Predictive analyticsnot Amazon Redshift ML
Amazon Redshift ML
- Adding a churn or propensity score to an existing dashboard where the data is already in Redshift and nobody needs a bespoke modelnot Anaconda
- Letting an analytics team test whether a predictive column has any business value before asking for data science headcountnot Anaconda
- Scoring rows inside a SQL pipeline where moving data out to a separate service would add fragility for little benefitnot Anaconda
- Organisations committed to AWS whose main constraint is a data science backlog rather than modelling sophisticationnot Anaconda
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Anaconda
- Dependency resolution slower than pip due to SAT solver complexity
- Not all PyPI packages available through default Anaconda repository
- Requires paid licenses for organizations with 200+ employees
- Larger disk footprint than minimal Python installations
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
- Autopilot searches many candidate models by default and the duration and cost of CREATE MODEL scale with the data size and the MAX_CELLS setting, so an unconstrained statement against a large table is an expensive accident rather than an experiment.
- Local inference runs on the Redshift cluster itself, so scoring millions of rows competes for the resources the warehouse exists to provide, and the remote inference alternative adds a per-batch network call plus an hourly SageMaker endpoint charge that persists whether or not anyone queries it.
- The supported problem types are limited to what the exposed algorithms cover, so anything involving text, images, sequences, a custom loss function or a bespoke evaluation metric is out of scope and has to be built conventionally.
- There is no retraining schedule, drift detection or model registry, so a model created by a statement stays exactly as trained until somebody remembers to recreate it, and nothing in the warehouse will report that its accuracy has decayed.
Pricing, plan by plan
Anaconda
Free- FreeFree
- 600+ pre-installed packages
- Anaconda Navigator
- 5GB cloud storage
- Starter$15/month
- 10GB cloud storage per user
- Professional development environment
- Team workspace controls
- Business$50/month
- Automated vulnerability scanning
- Audit trails
- Enterprise SSO
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
Which should you pick?
Choose Anaconda if
- You need conda package manager.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web/Cloud.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need create model in sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic model selection.
Questions people ask
- Is Anaconda or Amazon Redshift ML better?
- Neither clearly leads. Anaconda starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Anaconda or Amazon Redshift ML?
- Anaconda starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free.
- Does Anaconda or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
- Anaconda runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web/Cloud. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
- Can I use Anaconda for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Anaconda best used for?
- Anaconda is most often used for machine learning, data analysis, model training, predictive analytics. Of those, machine learning and data analysis are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
- What can Anaconda do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
- Anaconda covers Conda package manager, Environment management, 1500+ packages, Navigator GUI. Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL, Automatic model selection, Local inference, Bring your own model.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Anaconda: Does Anaconda have a free version?
Yes. Anaconda Distribution is free and includes 600+ pre-installed data science packages, Navigator, and 5GB of cloud storage. Organizations with 200+ employees must use paid plans unless they qualify for academic or non-profit exemptions.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Does it require SageMaker?
Yes. Redshift ML is an interface; the training happens in SageMaker and needs an IAM role and an S3 bucket for the intermediate data.
Anaconda: What is the difference between Anaconda Distribution and Miniconda?
Anaconda Distribution includes 600+ pre-installed packages optimized for data science out of the box. Miniconda is lightweight with only conda, Python, and essential packages, requiring manual installation of additional libraries.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Is there an extra charge?
The SQL interface is part of Redshift, but the training runs as a SageMaker job charged at SageMaker rates, and a remote inference endpoint is billed for as long as it exists.
Anaconda: Does Anaconda integrate with VS Code?
Yes. Anaconda environments can be activated in VS Code, and you can run Jupyter Notebooks directly. Both JupyterLab and conda can be managed through the VS Code Jupyter extension.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: What kinds of model can it build?
Regression, binary and multiclass classification through the automatic path, plus direct use of XGBoost, linear learner, multilayer perceptron and K-means. Anything beyond structured tabular prediction is out of scope.
Anaconda: What platforms does Anaconda support?
Anaconda runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with cloud-based deployment options. Anaconda Notebooks provides a cloud-based JupyterLab environment requiring no local installation.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Can I use a model I trained myself?
Yes, through the bring-your-own-model path, either compiled into the cluster for local inference or called as a remote SageMaker endpoint.
Anaconda: Do all PyPI packages work with Anaconda?
Not all PyPI packages are available through Anaconda's default conda repository. When a package is unavailable in conda, you can install it from conda-forge or pip as an alternative.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Does it retrain automatically?
No. Retraining means running CREATE MODEL again, on a schedule you build yourself, and nothing in the product monitors whether it is needed.
Related pages
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Other head to heads
- Anaconda vs Jupyter
- Anaconda vs Dataiku
- Anaconda vs KNIME
- Anaconda vs Python
- Anaconda vs Keras
- Anaconda vs scikit-learn
- Anaconda vs RapidMiner
- Anaconda vs PyTorch
- Anaconda vs ClearML
- Anaconda vs Stata
- Anaconda vs MATLAB
- Anaconda vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Anaconda vs Weaviate
- Anaconda vs Weights & Biases
- Anaconda vs Alteryx
- Anaconda vs Domino Data Lab
- Anaconda vs DVC
- Anaconda vs TensorFlow
- Anaconda vs Google Vertex AI
- Anaconda vs DataRobot
- Anaconda vs Azure Machine Learning
- Anaconda vs Databricks
- Anaconda vs SAS
- Anaconda vs H2O.ai
- Anaconda vs Weka
- Anaconda vs Hugging Face
- Anaconda vs Kubeflow
- Anaconda vs Langwatch
- Anaconda vs LlamaIndex
- Anaconda vs BigQuery ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Jupyter
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Dataiku
- Amazon Redshift ML vs KNIME
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Python
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Keras
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs RapidMiner
- Amazon Redshift ML vs PyTorch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs ClearML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Stata
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MATLAB
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weaviate
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weights & Biases
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Alteryx
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Domino Data Lab
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DVC
- Amazon Redshift ML vs TensorFlow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks
- Amazon Redshift ML vs SAS
- Amazon Redshift ML vs H2O.ai
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weka
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Hugging Face
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Kubeflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Langwatch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs LlamaIndex
- Amazon Redshift ML vs BigQuery ML
