Cybersecurity · head to head
Recorded Future vs Soketi

Recorded Future
Cybersecurity
Intelligence-driven cybersecurity
- From
- $25000/year
- Free plan
- No

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Soketi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Recorded Future no pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence, Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Recorded Future and Soketi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Recorded Future | Soketi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cloud | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Recorded Future
- Real-time threat intelligence
- Vulnerability intelligence
- Internet-wide data analysis
- Insikt group intelligence
- Brand intelligence
- API-first platform
- Alert and notification system
- Custom reporting
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Recorded Future
- Threat intelligence and monitoringnot Soketi
- Dark web monitoring and brand protectionnot Soketi
- Third-party risk managementnot Soketi
- Security operations and incident responsenot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Recorded Future
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Recorded Future
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Recorded Future
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Recorded Future
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Recorded Future
- No pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes
- Pricing depends on organization size, usage levels, and services in addition to tier selection
- API usage limits vary by package but limits not specified on pricing page
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
Recorded Future
$25000/year- Threat Intelligence$25000/year
- Threat feeds
- IP reputation
- Domain analysis
- Vulnerability Intelligence$35000/year
- CVE monitoring
- Patch intelligence
- Vulnerability trending
- Complete Intelligence$50000/year
- All features
- Analyst access
- Dedicated feed
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Recorded Future if
- You need real-time threat intelligence.
- You work on Web, Api, Cloud.
- You also want vulnerability intelligence.
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Recorded Future or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Recorded Future starts at $25000/year and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Recorded Future or Soketi?
- Soketi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $25000/year for Recorded Future and Free for Soketi.
- Does Recorded Future or Soketi run on more platforms?
- Recorded Future runs on Web, Api, Cloud. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Soketi for free?
- Yes. Soketi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Recorded Future starts at $25000/year.
- What is Recorded Future best used for?
- Recorded Future is most often used for threat intelligence and monitoring, dark web monitoring and brand protection, third-party risk management, security operations and incident response. Of those, threat intelligence and monitoring and dark web monitoring and brand protection are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can Recorded Future do that Soketi cannot?
- Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence, Vulnerability intelligence, Internet-wide data analysis, Insikt group intelligence. Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Recorded Future: What are the main pricing tiers offered by Recorded Future?
Recorded Future offers three tiers: Core (foundational intelligence), Professional (marked most-popular with automation and autonomous threat hunts), and Elite (comprehensive coverage including third-party risk assessment). Specific pricing requires contacting sales.
SourceSoketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Recorded Future: What is included in Recorded Future's Core pricing tier?
Core tier includes cyber operations monitoring with threat and malware insights, digital risk protection covering dark web monitoring and credential detection, and the new digital risk hub. Exact cost depends on organization size and usage.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Recorded Future: What features does Recorded Future Professional tier add?
Professional tier adds autonomous threat hunts, continuous threat monitoring, automated threat preventions, external intelligence ingestion, and external asset discovery. Pricing is custom-quoted based on organization size and services.
SourceSoketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Recorded Future: How does Recorded Future handle user limits and API access?
Recorded Future does not limit the number of platform users or integrations across any tier. API usage limits vary by package tier but exact limits are not specified on the public pricing page.
SourceSoketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
More on Recorded Future
Other head to heads
- Recorded Future vs Norton 360
- Recorded Future vs 1Password
- Recorded Future vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Recorded Future vs LastPass
- Recorded Future vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Recorded Future vs IBM QRadar
- Recorded Future vs Qualys VMDR
- Recorded Future vs Tenable
- Recorded Future vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Recorded Future vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Recorded Future vs Darktrace
- Recorded Future vs Proofpoint
- Recorded Future vs NordVPN
- Recorded Future vs Omada Identity
- Recorded Future vs Ory
- Recorded Future vs ProtonVPN
- Recorded Future vs Resolver
- Recorded Future vs Saviynt
- Recorded Future vs PartyKit
- Recorded Future vs Penpot
- Recorded Future vs Atlantis
- Recorded Future vs Coder
- Recorded Future vs Backstage
- Recorded Future vs Xlinesoft
- Recorded Future vs Bazel
- Recorded Future vs Eclipse IDE
- Recorded Future vs Pants Build
- Recorded Future vs Ansible
- Recorded Future vs Helix
- Recorded Future vs Jitsu
- Recorded Future vs Avo
- Recorded Future vs Azure DevOps
- Recorded Future vs Bitbucket
- Recorded Future vs Claude Code
- Recorded Future vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs Norton 360
- Soketi vs 1Password
- Soketi vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Soketi vs LastPass
- Soketi vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Soketi vs IBM QRadar
- Soketi vs Qualys VMDR
- Soketi vs Tenable
- Soketi vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Soketi vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Soketi vs Darktrace
- Soketi vs Proofpoint
- Soketi vs NordVPN
- Soketi vs Omada Identity
- Soketi vs Ory
- Soketi vs ProtonVPN
- Soketi vs Resolver
- Soketi vs Saviynt
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
