Cybersecurity · head to head
Qualys VMDR vs Transcend

Qualys VMDR
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered vulnerability management licensed per asset, using scanner appliances and a lightweight agent.
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Transcend
Cybersecurity
Privacy request automation, consent and AI governance across internal systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Qualys VMDR licensing is per asset and each capability is its own subscription, so patch management, endpoint detection, web application scanning, container security and policy compliance are separate line items, and the platform demonstrated in a proof of concept is rarely the platform in the quote.; Transcend value is proportional to integration coverage, so every bespoke internal service needs a connector that your engineers build and then maintain, and the automation promise degrades quietly each time an internal API changes and nobody updates the connector.
- They diverge on capability: Qualys VMDR covers Cloud Agent, Transcend covers Data subject request automation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qualys VMDR and Transcend actually diverge.
| Attribute | Qualys VMDR | Transcend |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Api | Web, API |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qualys VMDR
- Cloud Agent
- Scanner appliances
- Authenticated scanning
- TruRisk scoring
- Asset inventory
- Patch Management
- Cloud connectors
- Container sensor
Only in Transcend
- Data subject request automation
- Silo discovery
- Column level data mapping
- Consent and preference management
- Consent Mode support
- AI governance
- Assessments
- Audit evidence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qualys VMDR
- A hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coveragenot Transcend
- PCI DSS external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirementnot Transcend
- An estate spanning datacentre, multiple public clouds and endpoints that needs one vulnerability view rather than three toolsnot Transcend
- Organisations replacing a manual patch-verification process with agent-reported evidence that a fix actually landednot Transcend
Transcend
- A consumer app processing millions of user records that has to delete a user across a warehouse, a CRM, a support desk and three internal services within a statutory deadlinenot Qualys VMDR
- A privacy team that currently fulfils requests by emailing system owners and wants machine evidence that deletion actually occurrednot Qualys VMDR
- A company wiring consent signals through to advertising and analytics platforms so refused consent is honoured downstream rather than only at the bannernot Qualys VMDR
- An organisation putting policy controls on which customer data models and internal agents may read, ahead of an AI governance auditnot Qualys VMDR
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qualys VMDR
- Licensing is per asset and each capability is its own subscription, so patch management, endpoint detection, web application scanning, container security and policy compliance are separate line items, and the platform demonstrated in a proof of concept is rarely the platform in the quote.
- Ephemeral cloud instances consume asset entitlement until they age out of inventory, so an autoscaling group that creates and destroys hosts hourly can burn licence capacity on machines that existed for minutes, and controlling that means tuning purge policies rather than tuning the cloud.
- Authenticated scanning produces materially better results than unauthenticated, but it requires storing and rotating privileged credentials for every target platform, which is a security project in its own right, and teams that skip it receive reports full of unconfirmed potential findings that nobody trusts.
- The console is a set of modules with separate interfaces, search syntaxes and report engines, so an analyst moving between vulnerability management, policy compliance and web application scanning learns each one, and cross-module reporting usually ends in a spreadsheet or a script against the API.
- The tool surfaces findings far faster than any organisation can remediate them, and it does not solve the ownership problem: without an agreed prioritisation policy and a named owner in IT operations, a first scan producing tens of thousands of findings becomes a dashboard that everyone learns to ignore.
Transcend
- Value is proportional to integration coverage, so every bespoke internal service needs a connector that your engineers build and then maintain, and the automation promise degrades quietly each time an internal API changes and nobody updates the connector.
- Pricing is quoted and scales with data volume and integration count, so the cost grows precisely as the company grows, and there is no public anchor to negotiate against at renewal.
- It is deep on fulfilment and consent but thinner than OneTrust on wider governance, third party risk and ethics programme management, so a large enterprise privacy office may end up running two vendors.
- Deployment requires engineering time to install and authorise integrations into production data stores, which means the privacy team cannot buy and implement it alone and the project competes with engineering roadmap.
- Automated deletion against production systems is a destructive operation, so organisations without good staging environments and confident data ownership move slowly and often run the tool in advisory mode for months before letting it execute.
Pricing, plan by plan
Qualys VMDR
$3/month- VMDR$3/month
- Per asset
- Vulnerability scanning
- Detection
- VMDR+$5/month
- All VMDR features
- Advanced analytics
- Cloud integration
- VMDR Complete$7/month
- All VMDR+ features
- Threat intel
- Response automation
Transcend
On request- Transcend$undefined/year
- Priced by data volume, integrations and modules
- Subject request automation
- Consent and preference management
Which should you pick?
Choose Qualys VMDR if
- You need cloud agent.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Api.
- You also want scanner appliances.
Choose Transcend if
- You need data subject request automation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want silo discovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Qualys VMDR or Transcend better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qualys VMDR starts at $3/month and Transcend at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qualys VMDR or Transcend?
- Qualys VMDR starts at $3/month and Transcend at On request.
- Does Qualys VMDR or Transcend run on more platforms?
- Qualys VMDR runs on Web, Cloud, Api. Transcend runs on Web, API.
- What is Qualys VMDR best used for?
- Qualys VMDR is most often used for a hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coverage, pci dss external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirement, an estate spanning datacentre, multiple public clouds and endpoints that needs one vulnerability view rather than three tools, organisations replacing a manual patch-verification process with agent-reported evidence that a fix actually landed. Of those, a hybrid workforce where scheduled network scans miss most laptops and continuous agent-based assessment is the only way to get real coverage and pci dss external scanning where an approved scanning vendor report is a contractual requirement are not what Transcend is typically brought in for.
- What can Qualys VMDR do that Transcend cannot?
- Qualys VMDR covers Cloud Agent, Scanner appliances, Authenticated scanning, TruRisk scoring. Transcend covers Data subject request automation, Silo discovery, Column level data mapping, Consent and preference management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qualys VMDR: Agent or scanner: which do I need?
Usually both. The agent covers endpoints and servers you control and gives continuous data; scanners cover devices you cannot install an agent on, such as network gear, printers and appliances, and provide the external perimeter view.
Transcend: How is Transcend different from a subject request ticketing tool?
It executes the request against your systems through integrations rather than routing a task to a person. That is the whole product, and it is why the deployment requires engineering involvement.
Qualys VMDR: Does it patch as well as detect?
Yes, through the Patch Management module, which is a separate subscription using the same agent. Core VMDR detects and prioritises but does not deploy fixes.
Transcend: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Reported deals begin around 10,000 US dollars a year and rise with data volume, integration count and modules such as AI governance.
Qualys VMDR: How are assets counted for licensing?
By the number of assets in inventory, which includes cloud instances and containers depending on the modules in use. Short-lived cloud assets count until they are purged, so purge settings directly affect what you consume.
Transcend: Can it replace OneTrust?
For subject rights, consent and data mapping, often yes. For third party risk, ethics reporting and wider GRC programme management it is narrower.
Qualys VMDR: Can I keep the data in a specific region?
Yes. Qualys operates several regional platform instances and you choose which one your subscription lives on. Moving between them later is not trivial, so decide before onboarding.
Transcend: Does it handle unregistered systems?
It scans for personal data silos rather than relying solely on a declared inventory, which routinely surfaces systems the privacy register did not contain.
Qualys VMDR: Does it scan web applications?
Web Application Scanning is a separate module licensed per application, not part of core VMDR, and it is a dynamic scanner with the usual limits around authenticated flows in single-page applications.
Related pages
More on Qualys VMDR
Other head to heads
- Qualys VMDR vs LastPass
- Qualys VMDR vs 1Password
- Qualys VMDR vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Qualys VMDR vs Norton 360
- Qualys VMDR vs Tenable
- Qualys VMDR vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Qualys VMDR vs Aikido
- Qualys VMDR vs Proofpoint
- Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Qualys VMDR vs Recorded Future
- Qualys VMDR vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Qualys VMDR vs Falco
- Qualys VMDR vs Fenergo
- Qualys VMDR vs Google Authenticator
- Qualys VMDR vs Grype
- Qualys VMDR vs Hanwha Vision
- Qualys VMDR vs Idira
- Qualys VMDR vs Nessus
- Qualys VMDR vs Osano
- Qualys VMDR vs BigID
- Qualys VMDR vs Termly
- Qualys VMDR vs OneTrust
- Qualys VMDR vs DataGrail
- Qualys VMDR vs TrustArc
- Qualys VMDR vs Securiti
- Qualys VMDR vs ExpressVPN
- Qualys VMDR vs Endor Labs
- Qualys VMDR vs Mullvad VPN
- Qualys VMDR vs Private Internet Access
- Qualys VMDR vs Avast One
- Qualys VMDR vs Chainguard
- Qualys VMDR vs Cosign
- Qualys VMDR vs Dahua Technology
- Qualys VMDR vs Descope
- Qualys VMDR vs Drata
- Qualys VMDR vs CyberGhost VPN
- Transcend vs LastPass
- Transcend vs 1Password
- Transcend vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Transcend vs Norton 360
- Transcend vs Tenable
- Transcend vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Transcend vs Aikido
- Transcend vs Proofpoint
- Transcend vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Transcend vs Recorded Future
- Transcend vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Transcend vs Falco
- Transcend vs Fenergo
- Transcend vs Google Authenticator
- Transcend vs Grype
- Transcend vs Hanwha Vision
- Transcend vs Idira
- Transcend vs Nessus
- Transcend vs Osano
- Transcend vs BigID
- Transcend vs Termly
- Transcend vs OneTrust
- Transcend vs DataGrail
- Transcend vs TrustArc
- Transcend vs Securiti
- Transcend vs ExpressVPN
- Transcend vs Endor Labs
- Transcend vs Mullvad VPN
- Transcend vs Private Internet Access
- Transcend vs Avast One
- Transcend vs Chainguard
- Transcend vs Cosign
- Transcend vs Dahua Technology
- Transcend vs Descope
- Transcend vs Drata
- Transcend vs CyberGhost VPN
