Cloud · head to head
Qovery vs VictoriaMetrics

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

VictoriaMetrics
Cloud
Fast, cost-effective time series database for metrics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only VictoriaMetrics has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.; VictoriaMetrics promQL compatibility is very close but not identical, and MetricsQL extensions do not port back
- They diverge on capability: Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, VictoriaMetrics covers PromQL compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qovery and VictoriaMetrics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Qovery | VictoriaMetrics |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
Only in VictoriaMetrics
- PromQL compatible
- Low resource use
- Single binary or cluster
- Remote write target
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot VictoriaMetrics
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot VictoriaMetrics
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot VictoriaMetrics
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot VictoriaMetrics
VictoriaMetrics
- Keeping months or years of Prometheus metrics without the memory costnot Qovery
- High-cardinality metrics where Prometheus strugglesnot Qovery
- Consolidating metrics from many Prometheus instances into one queryable storenot Qovery
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
VictoriaMetrics
- PromQL compatibility is very close but not identical, and MetricsQL extensions do not port back
- Smaller community than Prometheus, so fewer guides and third-party integrations
- The clustered version has meaningfully more moving parts than the single binary suggests
- Some enterprise features sit outside the open-source offering
Pricing, plan by plan
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
VictoriaMetrics
Free- VictoriaMetricsFree
- Full functionality
- No data limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Choose VictoriaMetrics if
- You need promql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want low resource use.
Questions people ask
- Is Qovery or VictoriaMetrics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qovery starts at On request and VictoriaMetrics at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qovery or VictoriaMetrics?
- VictoriaMetrics has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Qovery and Free for VictoriaMetrics.
- Does Qovery or VictoriaMetrics run on more platforms?
- Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes. VictoriaMetrics runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use VictoriaMetrics for free?
- Yes. VictoriaMetrics has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Qovery best used for?
- Qovery is most often used for a regulated business that must keep application data inside its own aws account but has nobody to build a deployment platform, giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining terraform and helm by hand, standardising deployment across aws and gcp when acquisitions have left the organisation on two clouds, replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reach. Of those, a regulated business that must keep application data inside its own aws account but has nobody to build a deployment platform and giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining terraform and helm by hand are not what VictoriaMetrics is typically brought in for.
- What can Qovery do that VictoriaMetrics cannot?
- Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider. VictoriaMetrics covers PromQL compatible, Low resource use, Single binary or cluster, Remote write target.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
VictoriaMetrics: Is VictoriaMetrics free?
The open-source version is free with no data limits. An enterprise edition and cloud service are paid.
Qovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
VictoriaMetrics: Does it replace Prometheus?
It can, but most teams keep Prometheus for scraping and use VictoriaMetrics as the long-term store behind it.
Qovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
VictoriaMetrics: Is PromQL fully supported?
Very nearly. It implements PromQL and extends it with MetricsQL, though a small number of edge-case behaviours differ.
Qovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
More on VictoriaMetrics
Other head to heads
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook
- Qovery vs Thanos
- Qovery vs Grafana Cloud
- Qovery vs Zipkin
- Qovery vs Neon
- Qovery vs Cerebrium
- Qovery vs Wasabi
- Qovery vs Anyscale
- Qovery vs Fireworks AI
- Qovery vs OpenEBS
- Qovery vs OVHcloud
- Qovery vs Puppet
- Qovery vs Skopeo
- Qovery vs Linkerd
- Qovery vs Jaeger
- VictoriaMetrics vs Render
- VictoriaMetrics vs Porter
- VictoriaMetrics vs Northflank
- VictoriaMetrics vs CapRover
- VictoriaMetrics vs Coolify
- VictoriaMetrics vs Railway
- VictoriaMetrics vs Dokku
- VictoriaMetrics vs Scaleway
- VictoriaMetrics vs Portworx
- VictoriaMetrics vs Podman
- VictoriaMetrics vs containerd
- VictoriaMetrics vs Encore
- VictoriaMetrics vs Oracle Cloud
- VictoriaMetrics vs Orca Security
- VictoriaMetrics vs Packer
- VictoriaMetrics vs OpenTelemetry
- VictoriaMetrics vs Rook
- VictoriaMetrics vs Thanos
- VictoriaMetrics vs Grafana Cloud
- VictoriaMetrics vs Zipkin
- VictoriaMetrics vs Neon
- VictoriaMetrics vs Cerebrium
- VictoriaMetrics vs Wasabi
- VictoriaMetrics vs Anyscale
- VictoriaMetrics vs Fireworks AI
- VictoriaMetrics vs OpenEBS
- VictoriaMetrics vs OVHcloud
- VictoriaMetrics vs Puppet
- VictoriaMetrics vs Skopeo
- VictoriaMetrics vs Linkerd
- VictoriaMetrics vs Jaeger
