Cloud · head to head
Qovery vs Vellum

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Vellum
AI
Personalized AI assistant with persistent memory and autonomous action-taking
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Vellum has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.; Vellum pricing varies significantly by computational tier, making budget planning difficult
- They diverge on capability: Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Vellum covers Persistent AI identity.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Qovery and Vellum actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
Only in Vellum
- Persistent AI identity
- Long-term memory
- Email automation
- Calendar management
- Autonomous task execution
- Multi-device synchronization
- Custom plugins
- Open-source deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot Vellum
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot Vellum
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot Vellum
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot Vellum
Vellum
- Personal productivity automation across email and calendarnot Qovery
- CRM updates and pipeline managementnot Qovery
- Expense report generation and managementnot Qovery
- Document drafting and content creationnot Qovery
- Meeting scheduling and calendar coordinationnot Qovery
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Vellum
- Pricing varies significantly by computational tier, making budget planning difficult
- Requires explicit permission for sensitive actions, limiting autonomy
- Self-hosting option may intimidate non-technical users
- Learning curve to develop customizations with plugins
Pricing, plan by plan
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Vellum
Free- FreeFree
- Starter credits included
- Basic features
- Mighty$30/month
- 1 vCPU, 2 GiB RAM
- 10 GB storage
- Included usage allowance
- Super$100/month
- 2.5 vCPU, 5 GiB RAM
- 30 GB storage
- Assistant email and subdomain
- Ultra$200/month
- 4 vCPU, 8 GiB RAM
- 60 GB storage
- Assistant email and subdomain
Which should you pick?
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Choose Vellum if
- You need persistent ai identity.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, iOS, Slack, Telegram, Terminal.
- You also want long-term memory.
Questions people ask
- Is Qovery or Vellum better?
- Neither clearly leads. Qovery starts at On request and Vellum at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Qovery or Vellum?
- Vellum has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Qovery and Free for Vellum.
- Does Qovery or Vellum run on more platforms?
- Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes. Vellum runs on Web, macOS, iOS, Slack, Telegram, Terminal.
- Can I use Vellum for free?
- Yes. Vellum has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Qovery best used for?
- Qovery is most often used for a regulated business that must keep application data inside its own aws account but has nobody to build a deployment platform, giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining terraform and helm by hand, standardising deployment across aws and gcp when acquisitions have left the organisation on two clouds, replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reach. Of those, a regulated business that must keep application data inside its own aws account but has nobody to build a deployment platform and giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining terraform and helm by hand are not what Vellum is typically brought in for.
- What can Qovery do that Vellum cannot?
- Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider. Vellum covers Persistent AI identity, Long-term memory, Email automation, Calendar management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Qovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
Vellum: How does Vellum protect my data privacy?
Vellum uses permission-based controls requiring explicit approval for sensitive actions. Data is encrypted and the option for self-hosting provides complete data control. Open-source deployment option allows hosting on your own infrastructure.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
Vellum: Can I use Vellum for business team collaboration?
Vellum is primarily designed as a personal assistant with persistent identity. For team collaboration, platforms like Lindy offer better multi-user features with shared credit pools and Slack workspace integration.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Vellum: What does the free tier include?
Vellum offers free starter credits to begin using the platform. Beyond that, it operates on a pay-as-you-go credit model with paid tiers starting at $30/month for increased computational resources and bundled credits.
SourceQovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook
- Qovery vs Lindy
- Qovery vs Copilotly
- Qovery vs Gumloop
- Qovery vs ChatGPT
- Qovery vs Wordtune
- Qovery vs Replika
- Qovery vs Manus
- Qovery vs Deepgram
- Qovery vs Cartesia
- Qovery vs Tabnine
- Qovery vs D-ID
- Qovery vs Fathom
- Qovery vs Rytr
- Qovery vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Qovery vs Verbit
- Qovery vs Adobe Firefly
- Vellum vs Render
- Vellum vs Porter
- Vellum vs Northflank
- Vellum vs CapRover
- Vellum vs Coolify
- Vellum vs Railway
- Vellum vs Dokku
- Vellum vs Scaleway
- Vellum vs Portworx
- Vellum vs Podman
- Vellum vs containerd
- Vellum vs Encore
- Vellum vs Oracle Cloud
- Vellum vs Orca Security
- Vellum vs Packer
- Vellum vs OpenTelemetry
- Vellum vs Rook
- Vellum vs Lindy
- Vellum vs Copilotly
- Vellum vs Gumloop
- Vellum vs ChatGPT
- Vellum vs Wordtune
- Vellum vs Replika
- Vellum vs Manus
- Vellum vs Deepgram
- Vellum vs Cartesia
- Vellum vs Tabnine
- Vellum vs D-ID
- Vellum vs Fathom
- Vellum vs Rytr
- Vellum vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Vellum vs Verbit
- Vellum vs Adobe Firefly
