Cloud · head to head
Puppet vs Soketi

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Puppet no pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Puppet covers Manifests, Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Puppet and Soketi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Puppet
- Manifests
- Modules
- Classes
- Variables
- Facts
- Puppet Master
- Hiera
- Facter
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Puppet
- Infrastructure automationnot Soketi
- Configuration managementnot Soketi
- DevOps at scalenot Soketi
- Enterprise infrastructurenot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Puppet
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Puppet
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Puppet
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Puppet
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Puppet
- No pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales
- Enterprise and Advanced tiers require custom quote
- Free tier limited to 25 nodes maximum
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
Puppet
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 25 nodes
- Core Commercial$null/custom
- 25+ nodes
- Vendor-backed SLAs
- Training with Certified Engineers
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Web GUI
- RBAC
- Multi-environment support
- Advanced$null/custom
- AI-powered features
- Advanced patching
- Vulnerability remediation
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Puppet if
- You need manifests.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want modules.
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Puppet or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Puppet starts at Free and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Puppet or Soketi?
- Puppet starts at Free and Soketi at Free.
- Does Puppet or Soketi run on more platforms?
- Puppet runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Puppet for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Puppet best used for?
- Puppet is most often used for infrastructure automation, configuration management, devops at scale, enterprise infrastructure. Of those, infrastructure automation and configuration management are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can Puppet do that Soketi cannot?
- Puppet covers Manifests, Modules, Classes, Variables. Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Puppet: How much does Puppet cost?
Puppet's Developer tier is free for up to 25 nodes. Commercial, Enterprise, and Advanced tiers require contacting their sales team for a custom quote.
SourceSoketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Puppet: Is there a free version of Puppet?
Yes, Puppet's Developer tier is free forever for up to 25 nodes of infrastructure.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Puppet: What does the Enterprise tier include?
Puppet's Enterprise tier includes web GUI, RBAC, and multi-environment support for organizations managing infrastructure at scale, with pricing available upon request.
SourceSoketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Puppet vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Puppet vs DigitalOcean
- Puppet vs Grafana Cloud
- Puppet vs Neon
- Puppet vs Chef
- Puppet vs Packer
- Puppet vs Google Cloud Platform
- Puppet vs Microsoft Azure
- Puppet vs Lambda
- Puppet vs Oracle Cloud
- Puppet vs Akamai
- Puppet vs IBM Cloud
- Puppet vs Jaeger
- Puppet vs Linode
- Puppet vs Northflank
- Puppet vs Longhorn
- Puppet vs minikube
- Puppet vs PartyKit
- Puppet vs Penpot
- Puppet vs Atlantis
- Puppet vs Coder
- Puppet vs Backstage
- Puppet vs Visual Studio Code
- Puppet vs GNU Emacs
- Puppet vs Bazel
- Puppet vs Eclipse IDE
- Puppet vs Pants Build
- Puppet vs Swagger UI
- Puppet vs Ansible
- Puppet vs Cody
- Puppet vs ConfigCat
- Puppet vs Cortex
- Puppet vs Dagger
- Puppet vs Deno
- Puppet vs Fig
- Soketi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Soketi vs DigitalOcean
- Soketi vs Grafana Cloud
- Soketi vs Neon
- Soketi vs Chef
- Soketi vs Packer
- Soketi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Soketi vs Microsoft Azure
- Soketi vs Lambda
- Soketi vs Oracle Cloud
- Soketi vs Akamai
- Soketi vs IBM Cloud
- Soketi vs Jaeger
- Soketi vs Linode
- Soketi vs Northflank
- Soketi vs Longhorn
- Soketi vs minikube
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Visual Studio Code
- Soketi vs GNU Emacs
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Swagger UI
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Cody
- Soketi vs ConfigCat
- Soketi vs Cortex
- Soketi vs Dagger
- Soketi vs Deno
- Soketi vs Fig

