Cloud · head to head
IBM Cloud vs Soketi

IBM Cloud
Cloud
Enterprise cloud solutions from a trusted partner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM Cloud the USD 200 starter cloud credit is valid for 30 days only; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- They diverge on capability: IBM Cloud covers Virtual Servers, Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM Cloud and Soketi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM Cloud
- Virtual Servers
- Bare Metal
- Cloud Foundry
- Kubernetes
- Watson AI
- Blockchain
- Databases
- API Gateway
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM Cloud
- Running containerized and VM workloads on IBM's public cloudnot Soketi
- Building on Watson APIs and IBM middleware as managed servicesnot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot IBM Cloud
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot IBM Cloud
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot IBM Cloud
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot IBM Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM Cloud
- The USD 200 starter cloud credit is valid for 30 days only
- The larger promotional credits are time boxed: USD 1,000 for Bare Metal Servers for VPC over 120 days, USD 2,500 for Power Virtual Server over 90 days, and USD 5,000 for Backup and Recovery over 90 days
- The USD 5,000 Backup and Recovery promotion is valid for new clients only and requires a checkout promo code
- The listed promotions carry an expiry date of 31 December 2026
- Beyond the free tier the account is pay as you go, so cost tracks usage with no published cap
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM Cloud
Free- Lite PlanFree
- Free services
- Limited resources
- 30-day trial
- Standard PlanFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- Enterprise support
- Advanced services
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM Cloud if
- You need virtual servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal.
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM Cloud or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM Cloud starts at Free and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM Cloud or Soketi?
- IBM Cloud starts at Free and Soketi at Free.
- Does IBM Cloud or Soketi run on more platforms?
- IBM Cloud runs on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use IBM Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is IBM Cloud best used for?
- IBM Cloud is most often used for running containerized and vm workloads on ibm's public cloud, building on watson apis and ibm middleware as managed services. Of those, running containerized and vm workloads on ibm's public cloud and building on watson apis and ibm middleware as managed services are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM Cloud do that Soketi cannot?
- IBM Cloud covers Virtual Servers, Bare Metal, Cloud Foundry, Kubernetes. Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Soketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Soketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Soketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- IBM Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- IBM Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs Neon
- IBM Cloud vs Oracle Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs OVHcloud
- IBM Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
- IBM Cloud vs Lambda
- IBM Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs Chef
- IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- IBM Cloud vs Tencent Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs Packer
- IBM Cloud vs Porter
- IBM Cloud vs Rook
- IBM Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- IBM Cloud vs VictoriaMetrics
- IBM Cloud vs Vagrant
- IBM Cloud vs PartyKit
- IBM Cloud vs Penpot
- IBM Cloud vs Atlantis
- IBM Cloud vs Coder
- IBM Cloud vs Backstage
- IBM Cloud vs Xlinesoft
- IBM Cloud vs Bazel
- IBM Cloud vs Eclipse IDE
- IBM Cloud vs Pants Build
- IBM Cloud vs Ansible
- IBM Cloud vs Helix
- IBM Cloud vs Jitsu
- IBM Cloud vs Avo
- IBM Cloud vs Azure DevOps
- IBM Cloud vs Bitbucket
- IBM Cloud vs Claude Code
- IBM Cloud vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Soketi vs DigitalOcean
- Soketi vs Grafana Cloud
- Soketi vs Neon
- Soketi vs Oracle Cloud
- Soketi vs OVHcloud
- Soketi vs Microsoft Azure
- Soketi vs Lambda
- Soketi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Soketi vs Chef
- Soketi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Soketi vs Tencent Cloud
- Soketi vs Packer
- Soketi vs Porter
- Soketi vs Rook
- Soketi vs Serverless Framework
- Soketi vs VictoriaMetrics
- Soketi vs Vagrant
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
