Cloud · head to head
Pulumi vs Qovery

Pulumi
Cloud
Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Pulumi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Pulumi the free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- They diverge on capability: Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Qovery covers Bring your own cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pulumi and Qovery actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pulumi
- Multi-language support
- Multi-cloud
- State management
- Secrets management
- RBAC
- Stacks
- Automation API
- Policy as Code
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pulumi
- Infrastructure as codenot Qovery
- Cloud resource provisioningnot Qovery
- DevOps automationnot Qovery
- Multi-cloud managementnot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot Pulumi
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot Pulumi
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot Pulumi
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot Pulumi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pulumi
- The free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- The Team plan is $40 per month base including 40 credits, and caps the organisation at 10 users
- SAML/SSO, RBAC, audit logs and drift detection require the Enterprise plan at $400 per month base
- The per-resource rate rises from $0.1825 per resource per month on Team to $0.365 on Enterprise, so upgrading raises the unit price as well as the base fee
- Managed secrets are billed separately at $0.50 per secret per month on Team and $0.75 on Enterprise
- Self-hosting, SCIM user sync, audit log export and 24x7 support are only in Business Critical, which is custom priced with no published rate
- Team includes up to 500 resources and Enterprise up to 2,000, with everything beyond billed on demand as credits
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
Pulumi
Free- IndividualFree
- 1 user
- Unlimited projects/stacks
- 500 workflow minutes monthly
- Team$40/month
- Up to 10 users
- Secure collaboration
- CI/CD integration
- Enterprise$400/month
- Unlimited users
- SAML/SSO
- RBAC
- Business Critical$null/custom
- Self-hosting
- Advanced compliance
- SCIM integration
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose Pulumi if
- You need multi-language support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want multi-cloud.
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is Pulumi or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pulumi starts at Free and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pulumi or Qovery?
- Pulumi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Pulumi and On request for Qovery.
- Does Pulumi or Qovery run on more platforms?
- Pulumi runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Pulumi for free?
- Yes. Pulumi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Pulumi best used for?
- Pulumi is most often used for infrastructure as code, cloud resource provisioning, devops automation, multi-cloud management. Of those, infrastructure as code and cloud resource provisioning are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can Pulumi do that Qovery cannot?
- Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Multi-cloud, State management, Secrets management. Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pulumi: How much does Pulumi cost?
Pulumi offers a free Individual tier forever, Team plan at $40/month with 40 credits, and Enterprise at $400/month with 400 credits. Credit usage varies by resource type and workflow needs.
SourceQovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
Pulumi: What is included in the Pulumi free tier?
The free Individual tier includes 1 user, unlimited projects/stacks, 500 workflow minutes monthly, and 5 million Neo tokens free.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
Pulumi: How are Pulumi credits charged?
1 Pulumi Credit equals $1 USD. Credits are drawn from a shared pool. IaC resources cost $0.1825/month per resource on Team and $0.365 on Enterprise; ESC secrets cost $0.50-$0.75/month; workflow minutes cost $0.01 each.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Pulumi: Does Pulumi offer volume discounts?
Yes, the Enterprise tier ($400/month) includes volume discounts and is designed for approximately 2,000 IaC resources.
SourceQovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Pulumi vs SST
- Pulumi vs Terragrunt
- Pulumi vs Serverless Framework
- Pulumi vs Nitric
- Pulumi vs Encore
- Pulumi vs Neon
- Pulumi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Pulumi vs DigitalOcean
- Pulumi vs Grafana Cloud
- Pulumi vs Crossplane
- Pulumi vs Rancher
- Pulumi vs Packer
- Pulumi vs Oracle Cloud
- Pulumi vs Orca Security
- Pulumi vs Porter
- Pulumi vs Rook
- Pulumi vs Render
- Pulumi vs Northflank
- Pulumi vs CapRover
- Pulumi vs Coolify
- Pulumi vs Railway
- Pulumi vs Dokku
- Pulumi vs Scaleway
- Pulumi vs Portworx
- Pulumi vs Podman
- Pulumi vs containerd
- Pulumi vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs SST
- Qovery vs Terragrunt
- Qovery vs Serverless Framework
- Qovery vs Nitric
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Neon
- Qovery vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Qovery vs DigitalOcean
- Qovery vs Grafana Cloud
- Qovery vs Crossplane
- Qovery vs Rancher
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Rook
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
