Cloud · head to head
Proxmox VE vs Restate

Proxmox VE
Cloud
Open-source hypervisor combining KVM and LXC virtualisation
- From
- €120/year
- Free plan
- No

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Restate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Proxmox VE per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers; Restate the runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proxmox VE and Restate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proxmox VE | Restate |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | €120/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per month by durable action count |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted | Linux, macOS, Web |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proxmox VE
Nothing recorded that Restate does not also cover.
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proxmox VE
- Open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platformsnot Restate
- Cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisorsnot Restate
- High-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuitynot Restate
- Container deployments using LXC as lighter-weight alternative to Dockernot Restate
- Hybrid VM and container workloads in a single management interfacenot Restate
- Backup and archival infrastructure alongside primary virtualisationnot Restate
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot Proxmox VE
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot Proxmox VE
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot Proxmox VE
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot Proxmox VE
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proxmox VE
- Per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
- Linux-based host only; Windows hypervisors not supported, limiting adoption in Windows-focused organisations
- Clustering and high-availability setup requires operational expertise and careful network configuration
- Commercial support tiers limit advanced features (just-in-time access, network flow logs) to paid subscriptions
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and integrations compared to VMware vSphere
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume.
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow.
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add.
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proxmox VE
€120/year- Community$120/year
- Enterprise Repository access
- Community forum support only
- Per-socket subscription model
- Basic$370/year
- 3 support tickets per year
- 1 business day response time
- Stable updates and Enterprise Repository
- Standard$550/year
- 10 support tickets per year
- 4-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
- Premium$1100/year
- Unlimited support tickets
- 2-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/month
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1000/month
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Questions people ask
- Is Proxmox VE or Restate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year and Restate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proxmox VE or Restate?
- Restate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €120/year for Proxmox VE and Free for Restate.
- Does Proxmox VE or Restate run on more platforms?
- Proxmox VE runs on Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted. Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Restate for free?
- Yes. Restate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year.
- What is Proxmox VE best used for?
- Proxmox VE is most often used for open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platforms, cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisors, high-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuity, container deployments using lxc as lighter-weight alternative to docker. Of those, open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platforms and cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisors are not what Restate is typically brought in for.
- What can Proxmox VE do that Restate cannot?
- Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox VE: What is the licensing model for Proxmox VE?
Proxmox VE is open-source and free to deploy. Optional subscription tiers provide technical support, priority response times, and access to the Enterprise Repository for stable update channels. All tiers include identical virtualisation features.
SourceRestate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
Proxmox VE: Can I run Proxmox VE without a support subscription?
Yes. Community Edition (€120/year per socket) provides Enterprise Repository access with community-based support through forums. The core Proxmox VE platform is fully functional without any subscription.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Proxmox VE: What hypervisors does Proxmox VE support?
Proxmox VE includes both KVM for full virtualisation and LXC for Linux containers. It does not support Xen or Hyper-V. Workloads on those platforms must be migrated or reimplemented.
SourceRestate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Restate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Proxmox VE vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Proxmox VE vs Neon
- Proxmox VE vs DigitalOcean
- Proxmox VE vs Grafana Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Rancher
- Proxmox VE vs Longhorn
- Proxmox VE vs Vultr
- Proxmox VE vs OpenEBS
- Proxmox VE vs Anyscale
- Proxmox VE vs Go
- Proxmox VE vs Chef
- Proxmox VE vs DeepInfra
- Proxmox VE vs Fireworks AI
- Proxmox VE vs Heroku
- Proxmox VE vs Vault
- Proxmox VE vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Proxmox VE vs Jaeger
- Proxmox VE vs Helix
- Proxmox VE vs Rust
- Proxmox VE vs Atlantis
- Proxmox VE vs Jitsu
- Proxmox VE vs Okteto
- Proxmox VE vs Argo CD
- Proxmox VE vs Steampipe
- Proxmox VE vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Proxmox VE vs Deno
- Proxmox VE vs Visual Studio Code
- Proxmox VE vs Turborepo
- Proxmox VE vs Keycloak
- Proxmox VE vs Garden
- Proxmox VE vs GitLab CI/CD
- Proxmox VE vs HCP Terraform
- Proxmox VE vs Helm
- Proxmox VE vs Notepad++
- Restate vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Restate vs Neon
- Restate vs DigitalOcean
- Restate vs Grafana Cloud
- Restate vs Rancher
- Restate vs Longhorn
- Restate vs Vultr
- Restate vs OpenEBS
- Restate vs Anyscale
- Restate vs Go
- Restate vs Chef
- Restate vs DeepInfra
- Restate vs Fireworks AI
- Restate vs Heroku
- Restate vs Vault
- Restate vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Restate vs Jaeger
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs Visual Studio Code
- Restate vs Turborepo
- Restate vs Keycloak
- Restate vs Garden
- Restate vs GitLab CI/CD
- Restate vs HCP Terraform
- Restate vs Helm
- Restate vs Notepad++
