Web Development · head to head
Preact vs SST

Preact
Web Development
3kB alternative to React with the same modern API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Preact compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose; SST primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- They diverge on capability: Preact covers 3kB runtime, SST covers Single config file.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Preact and SST actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Preact
- 3kB runtime
- preact/compat
- Same modern API
- Fast rendering
Only in SST
- Single config file
- Resource linking
- Local development
- Multi-cloud support
- Multiple deployment stages
- VPC tunneling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Preact
- Embedded widgets that load inside someone else’s page and must stay smallnot SST
- Marketing and content sites where JavaScript payload affects Core Web Vitalsnot SST
- Applications targeting low-bandwidth or low-powered devicesnot SST
SST
- Deploying Next.js frontends with serverless backendsnot Preact
- Managing databases and storage alongside application codenot Preact
- Creating staging environments for feature testingnot Preact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Preact
- Compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
- Behavioural differences from React exist in edge cases, particularly around event handling
- A much smaller community, so unusual problems have fewer existing answers than React
SST
- Primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- Learning curve for developers unfamiliar with infrastructure concepts
- Limited documentation for some advanced use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Preact
Free- PreactFree
- Full library
- Commercial use permitted
- No usage limits
SST
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SST review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Preact if
- You need 3kb runtime.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want preact/compat.
Choose SST if
- You need single config file.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- You also want resource linking.
Questions people ask
- Is Preact or SST better?
- Neither clearly leads. Preact starts at Free and SST at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Preact or SST?
- Preact starts at Free and SST at Free.
- Does Preact or SST run on more platforms?
- Preact runs on Web. SST runs on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- Can I use Preact for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Preact best used for?
- Preact is most often used for embedded widgets that load inside someone else’s page and must stay small, marketing and content sites where javascript payload affects core web vitals, applications targeting low-bandwidth or low-powered devices. Of those, embedded widgets that load inside someone else’s page and must stay small and marketing and content sites where javascript payload affects core web vitals are not what SST is typically brought in for.
- What can Preact do that SST cannot?
- Preact covers 3kB runtime, preact/compat, Same modern API, Fast rendering. SST covers Single config file, Resource linking, Local development, Multi-cloud support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Preact: Is Preact free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
SST: Is SST free?
Yes, SST is open source and free. You only pay for cloud resources from AWS and other providers.
SourcePreact: Can I use React libraries with Preact?
Most, through the preact/compat layer. Compatibility is good but not complete, so libraries relying on React internals can break.
SST: What cloud providers does SST support?
SST supports over 150 providers through built-in AWS and Cloudflare components, plus Pulumi and Terraform providers.
SourcePreact: Why choose Preact over React?
Bundle size, almost always. If payload is not a binding constraint, React’s ecosystem is usually the better trade.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Preact vs React
- Preact vs SolidJS
- Preact vs MUI
- Preact vs Bootstrap
- Preact vs esbuild
- Preact vs Lit
- Preact vs MySQL
- Preact vs Docusaurus
- Preact vs Vue.js
- Preact vs Angular
- Preact vs Radix UI
- Preact vs shadcn/ui
- Preact vs HTMX
- Preact vs Node.js
- Preact vs v0 by Vercel
- Preact vs Wix
- Preact vs Apache HTTP Server
- Preact vs Wix Studio
- Preact vs Pulumi
- Preact vs Serverless Framework
- Preact vs Heroku
- Preact vs Packer
- Preact vs Encore
- Preact vs Render
- Preact vs Porter
- Preact vs Coolify
- Preact vs CapRover
- Preact vs Terragrunt
- Preact vs Zeabur
- Preact vs Railway
- Preact vs Crossplane
- Preact vs Dokku
- Preact vs Fastly
- Preact vs Flux
- SST vs React
- SST vs SolidJS
- SST vs MUI
- SST vs Bootstrap
- SST vs esbuild
- SST vs Lit
- SST vs MySQL
- SST vs Docusaurus
- SST vs Vue.js
- SST vs Angular
- SST vs Radix UI
- SST vs shadcn/ui
- SST vs HTMX
- SST vs Node.js
- SST vs v0 by Vercel
- SST vs Wix
- SST vs Apache HTTP Server
- SST vs Wix Studio
- SST vs Pulumi
- SST vs Serverless Framework
- SST vs Heroku
- SST vs Packer
- SST vs Encore
- SST vs Render
- SST vs Porter
- SST vs Coolify
- SST vs CapRover
- SST vs Terragrunt
- SST vs Zeabur
- SST vs Railway
- SST vs Crossplane
- SST vs Dokku
- SST vs Fastly
- SST vs Flux

