Technology · head to head
PostHog vs Split

PostHog
Technology
The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Split
Testing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only PostHog has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: PostHog the free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts; Split split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- They diverge on capability: PostHog covers Product analytics, Split covers Feature flags with targeting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PostHog and Split actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PostHog
- Product analytics
- Session recording
- Feature flags
- A/B testing
- Heatmaps
- SQL access
- Data warehouse
- Apps platform
Only in Split
- Feature flags with targeting
- Metrics impact engine
- Guardrail metrics
- Statistical significance testing
- Event ingestion
- SDKs and streaming updates
- Audit and approvals
- Harness platform integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PostHog
- Product analyticsnot Split
- Feature experimentationnot Split
- User behavior trackingnot Split
- A/B testingnot Split
- Debug production issuesnot Split
Split
- A product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experimentsnot PostHog
- Running A/B tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard linesnot PostHog
- Catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyonenot PostHog
- A team already committed to Harness for CI and CD that wants flags in the same platform and contractnot PostHog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PostHog
- The free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts
- Accounts without a card on file are limited to 1 project; adding one raises it to 6
- Data retention is 1 year until a card is added, which extends it to 7 years
- Support is community-only until the account is on a paid plan
- Error tracking is capped at 100K exceptions and surveys at 1500 responses per month on the free tier
Split
- Split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Harness no longer publishes per-module prices, so an organisation that wants only feature management cannot get a list price and must negotiate a module out of a platform bundle.
- The measurement engine needs traffic volume to reach significance, so a product with modest usage gets flags with an experimentation layer it will rarely be able to conclude anything from.
- Metric attribution depends on correctly instrumented events flowing into Split, which is an integration project in its own right; without it you have paid for an experimentation platform and are using it as a flag switch.
- As part of a larger DevOps suite the roadmap now competes with CI, CD, security and cloud cost modules for attention, so feature management is no longer the company’s single focus the way it was as an independent product.
Pricing, plan by plan
PostHog
Free- FreeFree
- 1M events/month
- 5K sessions/month
- Unlimited users
- Paid$undefined/month
- $0.00031/event
- $0.005/session
- Advanced permissions
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML SSO
- Advanced security
- Dedicated support
Split
On request- Harness FreeFree
- Harness Open Source and community support
- Intended for individuals and small teams
- Feature management capability limited at this tier
- Harness Essentials$undefined/year
- Bundled DevOps modules including CI, CD, IaC and security testing
- Standard support
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Harness Enterprise$undefined/year
- Mix and match from 15 or more modules including Feature Management and Experimentation
- Premier support with a dedicated account manager
- Higher pipeline concurrency and organisation limits
Which should you pick?
Choose PostHog if
- You need product analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want session recording.
Choose Split if
- You need feature flags with targeting.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- You also want metrics impact engine.
Questions people ask
- Is PostHog or Split better?
- Neither clearly leads. PostHog starts at Free and Split at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PostHog or Split?
- PostHog has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for PostHog and On request for Split.
- Does PostHog or Split run on more platforms?
- PostHog runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Split runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- Can I use PostHog for free?
- Yes. PostHog has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Split starts at On request.
- What is PostHog best used for?
- PostHog is most often used for product analytics, feature experimentation, user behavior tracking, a/b testing. Of those, product analytics and feature experimentation are not what Split is typically brought in for.
- What can PostHog do that Split cannot?
- PostHog covers Product analytics, Session recording, Feature flags, A/B testing. Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Metrics impact engine, Guardrail metrics, Statistical significance testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PostHog: What does PostHog's free tier include per month?
PostHog free tier includes: 1M analytics events, 5K session replays, 1M feature flag requests, 100K error tracking exceptions, 1,500 survey responses, 1M data warehouse rows, 10K data pipeline events, 100K AI observability events, 500 PostHog AI credits, 10K workflow messages, and 10GB log ingestion. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceSplit: Is Split still called Split?
It is now sold as Harness Feature Management and Experimentation after the Harness acquisition, and split.io redirects to harness.io.
PostHog: How much data retention does PostHog provide on paid plans?
PostHog free tier provides 1-year data retention. Pay-as-you-go plans offer 7-year data retention across all projects, enabling longer historical analysis. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceSplit: Can I buy just feature flags?
Not from a price list. Harness publishes bundle tiers and directs single-module buyers to sales.
PostHog: What percentage of PostHog users stay on the free tier?
PostHog states that 97% of companies use PostHog for free, indicating extensive free tier adoption. However, specific per-unit pricing rates for overages on paid plans are not published. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceSplit: What does it do that a plain flag service does not?
It attributes changes in your product metrics to specific flags with statistical significance testing and alerts on guardrail metrics.
PostHog: When does PostHog provide priority support on paid plans?
PostHog provides email or Slack support for accounts exceeding $2,000/month on pay-as-you-go plans. Specific response times and support SLAs are not detailed on their pricing page. Source: https://posthog.com/pricing
SourceSplit: Do we need a lot of traffic?
Yes. Statistical tests need volume to conclude, so low-traffic products get limited value from the measurement layer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- PostHog vs Mixpanel
- PostHog vs Amplitude
- PostHog vs LaunchDarkly
- PostHog vs Heap
- PostHog vs ClickUp
- PostHog vs Asana
- PostHog vs Figma
- PostHog vs Linear
- PostHog vs GitHub
- PostHog vs LogRocket
- PostHog vs Plane
- PostHog vs Storybook
- PostHog vs Microsoft Edge
- PostHog vs Netlify
- PostHog vs Productboard
- PostHog vs Sentry
- PostHog vs Trino
- PostHog vs Aha!
- PostHog vs Eppo
- PostHog vs GrowthBook
- PostHog vs Kameleoon
- PostHog vs Selenium
- PostHog vs TestRail
- PostHog vs Katalon
- PostHog vs Sauce Labs
- PostHog vs Applitools
- PostHog vs QA Wolf
- PostHog vs BrowserStack
- PostHog vs CircleCI
- PostHog vs Robot Framework
- PostHog vs Testsigma
- PostHog vs Vitest
- PostHog vs Cucumber
- PostHog vs Detox
- Split vs Mixpanel
- Split vs Amplitude
- Split vs LaunchDarkly
- Split vs Heap
- Split vs ClickUp
- Split vs Asana
- Split vs Figma
- Split vs Linear
- Split vs GitHub
- Split vs LogRocket
- Split vs Plane
- Split vs Storybook
- Split vs Microsoft Edge
- Split vs Netlify
- Split vs Productboard
- Split vs Sentry
- Split vs Trino
- Split vs Aha!
- Split vs Eppo
- Split vs GrowthBook
- Split vs Kameleoon
- Split vs Selenium
- Split vs TestRail
- Split vs Katalon
- Split vs Sauce Labs
- Split vs Applitools
- Split vs QA Wolf
- Split vs BrowserStack
- Split vs CircleCI
- Split vs Robot Framework
- Split vs Testsigma
- Split vs Vitest
- Split vs Cucumber
- Split vs Detox
