Cloud · head to head
Portworx vs Sysdig

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -

Sysdig
Cybersecurity
Cloud-native runtime security platform with real-time detection and response
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.; Sysdig custom pricing requires sales contact, difficult to compare costs
- They diverge on capability: Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Sysdig covers Real-time threat detection and response.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Portworx and Sysdig actually diverge.
| Attribute | Portworx | Sysdig |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0.33/node hour | On request |
| Pricing model | Per node hour | Custom pricing based on number of hosts, events processed, or time series data |
| Platforms | Linux | Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, GCP, Azure, Cloud-native |
| Category | Cloud | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
Only in Sysdig
- Real-time threat detection and response
- Runtime intelligence
- AI-powered security agents
- Vulnerability management
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- Container and Kubernetes security
- Infrastructure as Code security
- Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Sysdig
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Sysdig
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Sysdig
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Sysdig
Sysdig
- Real-time threat detection in Kubernetes clustersnot Portworx
- Container workload vulnerability prioritizationnot Portworx
- Cloud security posture compliance monitoringnot Portworx
- Infrastructure entitlement and permission analysisnot Portworx
- AI workload security and threat remediationnot Portworx
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Sysdig
- Custom pricing requires sales contact, difficult to compare costs
- No published pricing tiers or calculator available
- Primarily focused on cloud-native environments
- Requires integration with existing SIEM or monitoring tools for full visibility
- Steep learning curve for runtime security concepts
Pricing, plan by plan
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Sysdig
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Sysdig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Choose Sysdig if
- You need real-time threat detection and response.
- You work on Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, GCP, Azure, Cloud-native.
- You also want runtime intelligence.
Questions people ask
- Is Portworx or Sysdig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour and Sysdig at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Portworx or Sysdig?
- Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour and Sysdig at On request.
- Does Portworx or Sysdig run on more platforms?
- Portworx runs on Linux. Sysdig runs on Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, GCP, Azure, Cloud-native.
- What is Portworx best used for?
- Portworx is most often used for running a production postgresql or cassandra cluster on kubernetes and needing the data to survive node loss, a platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal kubernetes platform, failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery position, an openshift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful sets. Of those, running a production postgresql or cassandra cluster on kubernetes and needing the data to survive node loss and a platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal kubernetes platform are not what Sysdig is typically brought in for.
- What can Portworx do that Sysdig cannot?
- Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation. Sysdig covers Real-time threat detection and response, Runtime intelligence, AI-powered security agents, Vulnerability management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Portworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Sysdig: How does Sysdig achieve real-time threat detection?
Sysdig uses runtime intelligence with kernel-level system visibility, capturing live system calls to detect threats at machine speed, typically within 2 seconds.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Sysdig: What is runtime intelligence and how does it differ from configuration-based security?
Runtime intelligence reveals what is actually executing in cloud environments through kernel-level visibility, rather than relying on theoretical risks from configuration analysis alone.
SourcePortworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Sysdig: What cloud platforms does Sysdig support?
Sysdig supports AWS, GCP, Azure, and IBM Cloud with multiple regional data centers across US, EU, and other regions.
SourceSysdig: Does Sysdig integrate with existing security tools?
Yes, Sysdig integrates with existing SIEM and monitoring tools to provide unified security visibility across cloud infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube
- Portworx vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Portworx vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Portworx vs Aikido
- Portworx vs Darktrace
- Portworx vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Portworx vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Portworx vs Tenable
- Portworx vs Proofpoint
- Portworx vs Teleport
- Portworx vs Snyk
- Portworx vs Qualys VMDR
- Portworx vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Portworx vs BeyondTrust
- Portworx vs Bitdefender VPN
- Portworx vs Burp Suite
- Portworx vs Check Point Software
- Sysdig vs OpenEBS
- Sysdig vs Rancher
- Sysdig vs Longhorn
- Sysdig vs Podman
- Sysdig vs Scaleway
- Sysdig vs DigitalOcean
- Sysdig vs Packer
- Sysdig vs Crossplane
- Sysdig vs Dokku
- Sysdig vs Encore
- Sysdig vs Fastly
- Sysdig vs Google Cloud Platform
- Sysdig vs K3s
- Sysdig vs Flux
- Sysdig vs Vagrant
- Sysdig vs Kustomize
- Sysdig vs minikube
- Sysdig vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Sysdig vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Sysdig vs Aikido
- Sysdig vs Darktrace
- Sysdig vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Sysdig vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Sysdig vs Tenable
- Sysdig vs Proofpoint
- Sysdig vs Teleport
- Sysdig vs Snyk
- Sysdig vs Qualys VMDR
- Sysdig vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Sysdig vs BeyondTrust
- Sysdig vs Bitdefender VPN
- Sysdig vs Burp Suite
- Sysdig vs Check Point Software
