APIs · head to head
PocketBase vs QuestDB

PocketBase
APIs
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PocketBase requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: PocketBase covers REST API, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PocketBase and QuestDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | PocketBase | QuestDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD | Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) |
| Category | APIs | Databases |
| Founded | 2021 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PocketBase
- REST API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Admin UI
- SQLite
- Webhooks
- File storage
- Go support
- Self-hosted support
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PocketBase
- Embedded realtime database with REST APInot QuestDB
- Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot QuestDB
- Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot QuestDB
- File storage and media attachment managementnot QuestDB
- Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot QuestDB
- Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot PocketBase
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot PocketBase
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not PocketBase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PocketBase
- Requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- No built-in hosting provided
- Community support only
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
PocketBase
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PocketBase if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is PocketBase or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. PocketBase starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PocketBase or QuestDB?
- PocketBase starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does PocketBase or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use PocketBase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PocketBase best used for?
- PocketBase is most often used for embedded realtime database with rest api, backend-as-a-service for single-file deployments, rapid application development with email/oauth2 authentication, file storage and media attachment management. Of those, embedded realtime database with rest api and backend-as-a-service for single-file deployments are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can PocketBase do that QuestDB cannot?
- PocketBase covers REST API, Real-time subscriptions, Admin UI, SQLite. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Both handle Docker support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PocketBase: How much does PocketBase cost?
PocketBase is completely free and open-source. It is a self-hosted backend solution with database, authentication, and file storage capabilities at no cost.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourcePocketBase: Is PocketBase open-source?
Yes, PocketBase is open-source software. You can download, modify, and deploy it yourself at no cost with no licensing restrictions.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- PocketBase vs Appwrite
- PocketBase vs Hasura
- PocketBase vs Bruno
- PocketBase vs HTTPie
- PocketBase vs Backendless
- PocketBase vs Directus
- PocketBase vs Strapi
- PocketBase vs Hoppscotch
- PocketBase vs Janus Gateway
- PocketBase vs KeystoneJS
- PocketBase vs Kong
- PocketBase vs Thunder Client
- PocketBase vs Yapily
- PocketBase vs 10x Banking
- PocketBase vs Brite Payments
- PocketBase vs Bud Financial
- PocketBase vs Episode Six
- PocketBase vs TimescaleDB
- PocketBase vs PostgreSQL
- PocketBase vs Cockroach Labs
- PocketBase vs Amazon Aurora
- PocketBase vs Airtable
- PocketBase vs Firebolt
- PocketBase vs Apache Flink
- PocketBase vs DuckDB
- PocketBase vs OpenSearch
- PocketBase vs ClickHouse
- PocketBase vs NATS
- PocketBase vs Canary Labs
- PocketBase vs Chroma
- PocketBase vs Cloudinary
- PocketBase vs Convex
- PocketBase vs Dgraph
- PocketBase vs Dragonfly
- PocketBase vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Appwrite
- QuestDB vs Hasura
- QuestDB vs Bruno
- QuestDB vs HTTPie
- QuestDB vs Backendless
- QuestDB vs Directus
- QuestDB vs Strapi
- QuestDB vs Hoppscotch
- QuestDB vs Janus Gateway
- QuestDB vs KeystoneJS
- QuestDB vs Kong
- QuestDB vs Thunder Client
- QuestDB vs Yapily
- QuestDB vs 10x Banking
- QuestDB vs Brite Payments
- QuestDB vs Bud Financial
- QuestDB vs Episode Six
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
