Softwr

Technology · head to head

Plane vs TestNG

Plane logo

Plane

Technology

Open-source project management tool

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
TestNG logo

TestNG

Testing

Java testing framework created by Cedric Beust, still actively maintained but effectively a single-lead project

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Plane self-hosted Community edition requires managing your own Docker/Kubernetes infra plus your own PostgreSQL, Redis, and S3-compatible/GCS/MinIO storage; no single-binary install; TestNG maintainership is concentrated around creator Cedric Beust rather than a broad team or foundation, which is a real continuity risk compared to JUnit's independent team or Jest's foundation backing.
  • They diverge on capability: Plane covers Issue tracking, TestNG covers Test dependencies.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Plane and TestNG actually diverge.

Attributes where Plane and TestNG differ
AttributePlaneTestNG
Pricing modelfreemiumOpen source, no licence fee
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, macOS, WindowsLinux, macOS, Windows
CategoryTechnologyTesting
Founded2022Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Plane

  • Issue tracking
  • Cycles (Sprints)
  • Modules
  • Views & layouts
  • Pages (Docs)
  • Analytics
  • API access
  • Webhooks

Only in TestNG

  • Test dependencies
  • XML suite configuration
  • Native parallel execution
  • Data providers
  • Grouping
  • Flexible reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Plane

  • Project and task management with cycles, modules, epics, and initiativesnot TestNG
  • Documentation and knowledge management via workspace wiki tied to project worknot TestNG
  • Sprint planning and issue triagenot TestNG
  • Cross-functional collaboration with analytics and dashboardsnot TestNG
  • Migration target from Jira, Linear, Monday, ClickUp, or Asananot TestNG

TestNG

  • A Java integration test suite that needs to skip dependent tests automatically when a prerequisite test failsnot Plane
  • A team wanting XML-based suite configuration to manage large, grouped test suites without touching code for each runnot Plane
  • A project needing native parallel test execution at the class or method level without adding a separate pluginnot Plane
  • A Selenium-based UI test suite that uses TestNG as the underlying runner for grouping and parallelisationnot Plane

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Plane

  • Self-hosted Community edition requires managing your own Docker/Kubernetes infra plus your own PostgreSQL, Redis, and S3-compatible/GCS/MinIO storage; no single-binary install
  • Cloud Free tier caps at 12 users and 500 AI credits per seat per month
  • Substantial feature gating by tier: custom work item types, workspace wiki, time tracking, dashboards, initiatives, teamspaces, and integrations require Pro or above; LDAP, granular access control, and multi-workflow approvals require Enterprise Grid
  • Guest-to-paid-member ratio capped at 1:5 on the Pro plan

TestNG

  • Maintainership is concentrated around creator Cedric Beust rather than a broad team or foundation, which is a real continuity risk compared to JUnit's independent team or Jest's foundation backing.
  • It is a smaller ecosystem than JUnit, so fewer third-party integrations, tutorials and Stack Overflow answers exist for edge cases.
  • XML-based suite configuration, while powerful, is an extra file and syntax to maintain alongside the codebase, which some teams find adds friction JUnit's more code-centric model avoids.
  • There is no commercial support tier or vendor relationship of any kind, unlike JUnit's OpenElements arrangement, so an enterprise wanting a support contract has no route to buy one.
  • Release cadence, while active, is slower and less frequent than JUnit 5's, since it depends on a much smaller pool of active maintainers.

Pricing, plan by plan

Plane

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 500 AI credits per seat
    • Max 12 users
    • Unlimited projects
  • Pro$6/seat per month
    • 1,000 AI credits per seat
    • Unlimited users
    • Custom work item types
  • Business$13/seat per month
    • 2,000 AI credits per seat
    • Unlimited users
    • Project templates, recurring work items
  • Enterprise Grid$null/mo
    • Flexible AI credit allocation
    • Private deployments
    • Granular access control

TestNG

Free
  • TestNGFree
    • Full functionality, no usage limits
    • Community support via GitHub
    • No commercial support tier exists

Which should you pick?

Choose Plane if

  • You need issue tracking.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
  • You also want cycles (sprints).
Plane review

Choose TestNG if

  • You need test dependencies.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
  • You also want xml suite configuration.
TestNG review

Questions people ask

Is Plane or TestNG better?
Neither clearly leads. Plane starts at Free and TestNG at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Plane or TestNG?
Plane starts at Free and TestNG at Free.
Does Plane or TestNG run on more platforms?
Plane runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows. TestNG runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
Can I use Plane for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Plane best used for?
Plane is most often used for project and task management with cycles, modules, epics, and initiatives, documentation and knowledge management via workspace wiki tied to project work, sprint planning and issue triage, cross-functional collaboration with analytics and dashboards. Of those, project and task management with cycles, modules, epics, and initiatives and documentation and knowledge management via workspace wiki tied to project work are not what TestNG is typically brought in for.
What can Plane do that TestNG cannot?
Plane covers Issue tracking, Cycles (Sprints), Modules, Views & layouts. TestNG covers Test dependencies, XML suite configuration, Native parallel execution, Data providers.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Plane: Does Plane offer a free plan?

Yes, Plane's free tier includes 500 AI credits per seat, support for up to 12 users, and access to projects, work items, cycles, modules, layouts, views, estimates, and pages.

Source
TestNG: Is TestNG still actively maintained in 2026?

Yes, it continues to receive releases in its 7.x line with support for current Java versions, though maintenance is concentrated around a small team led by its creator.

Plane: How much does Plane Pro cost?

Plane Pro costs $6/seat per month and saves 25% when billed annually. It includes 1,000 AI credits per seat, unlimited users, and access to custom work item types, wiki, time tracking, and integrations.

Source
TestNG: What does TestNG offer that JUnit does not?

Native test dependencies, XML-based suite configuration and built-in parallel execution without needing external plugins, all of which JUnit users typically add via separate libraries.

Plane: What is the difference between Plane's paid tiers?

Pro ($6/seat/month) includes 1,000 AI credits and workspace wiki. Business ($13/seat/month) adds 2,000 AI credits, project templates, and recurring work items. Enterprise Grid offers custom pricing with multiple workflows and LDAP support.

Source
TestNG: Is there a commercial support option for TestNG?

No, unlike JUnit there is no commercial support arrangement; support is purely community-based through GitHub.

Share

Related pages

More on Plane

More on TestNG

Keep looking

Other head to heads