Agriculture · head to head
Pix4Dfields vs Tucor

Tucor
Agriculture
Decoder irrigation controllers with a yearly remote-access subscription priced separately for cellular and Ethernet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Pix4Dfields satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year; Tucor nLPNet is a yearly subscription priced differently for cellular and Ethernet, so a site with no cabled network path is committed to the higher recurring rate for the life of the controller with no way to change it later without running fibre.
- They diverge on capability: Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, Tucor covers NLP-C controller.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pix4Dfields and Tucor actually diverge.
| Attribute | Pix4Dfields | Tucor |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $330/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Ios | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pix4Dfields
- Orthomosaic generation
- NDVI & vegetation indices
- Multispectral processing
- Zonation mapping
- Prescription maps
- Stand count
- Export to machinery
- Offline processing
Only in Tucor
- NLP-C controller
- Decoder diagnostics
- Flow monitoring
- MAD-based programming
- Station prioritisation
- Weather correction and water budget
- NLPNet remote access
- Cycle Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pix4Dfields
- Processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limitsnot Tucor
- Generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveysnot Tucor
- Producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinerynot Tucor
- Agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flightsnot Tucor
Tucor
- A university retrofitting a conventional multi-wire system to two-wire without trenching a new cable to every valvenot Pix4Dfields
- A nursery or greenhouse needing 50 independent programmes on one controllernot Pix4Dfields
- A grounds team chasing a decoder fault on a mile-long loop who need it located rather than dug fornot Pix4Dfields
- An HOA that wants unscheduled-flow alarms after a contractor cut a lateralnot Pix4Dfields
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pix4Dfields
- Satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- Monthly billing is listed at $165.83 per month against $1,990 for a year, so paying monthly costs substantially more
- The software runs only on Windows and macOS, with no Linux build
Tucor
- NLPNet is a yearly subscription priced differently for cellular and Ethernet, so a site with no cabled network path is committed to the higher recurring rate for the life of the controller with no way to change it later without running fibre.
- Neither the controllers nor the subscriptions have published prices, so a multi-controller estate cannot budget a rollout without distributor quotes for each site.
- Tucor runs two separate cloud portals, NLPNet and Cycle Manager, which is a confusing surface for a small vendor and means the answer to where a function lives depends on which product line you bought.
- It is a small independent competing with Rain Bird, Hunter and Toro, so the installer and spares network is thinner and a site is more exposed if a distributor relationship in its region ends.
- The product documentation is sparse compared with the major manufacturers, so specifying and commissioning depends heavily on the local distributor knowing the platform rather than on published material a consulting engineer can read.
Pricing, plan by plan
Pix4Dfields
$330/month- Monthly$330/month
- RGB & multispectral processing
- Vegetation indices
- Zonation maps
- Annual$2640/year
- Everything in Monthly
- 33% savings
- Priority support
- Perpetual$5500/one-time
- Lifetime license
- 1 year updates
- Local processing
Tucor
On request- NLPNet remote access$undefined/year
- Yearly subscription required for remote access
- Separate pricing for cellular and Ethernet connections
- Priced per controller
Which should you pick?
Choose Pix4Dfields if
- You need orthomosaic generation.
- You work on Windows, Ios.
- You also want ndvi & vegetation indices.
Choose Tucor if
- You need nlp-c controller.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want decoder diagnostics.
Questions people ask
- Is Pix4Dfields or Tucor better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and Tucor at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pix4Dfields or Tucor?
- Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and Tucor at On request.
- Does Pix4Dfields or Tucor run on more platforms?
- Pix4Dfields runs on Windows, Ios. Tucor runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- What is Pix4Dfields best used for?
- Pix4Dfields is most often used for processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits, generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys, producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinery, agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flights. Of those, processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits and generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys are not what Tucor is typically brought in for.
- What can Pix4Dfields do that Tucor cannot?
- Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, NDVI & vegetation indices, Multispectral processing, Zonation mapping. Tucor covers NLP-C controller, Decoder diagnostics, Flow monitoring, MAD-based programming.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pix4Dfields: How much does PIX4Dfields cost?
PIX4Dfields costs $111 per month for a monthly subscription plan. The software offers actionable data and insights from drone imagery for high efficiency and productivity in precision agriculture. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceTucor: Is remote access included with the controller?
No. NLPNet is a separate yearly subscription, and it is priced differently depending on whether the controller connects over cellular or Ethernet.
Pix4Dfields: Does PIX4Dfields offer a free trial?
Yes, PIX4Dfields provides a free 15-day trial that requires no credit card to start. You can cancel before renewal without incurring charges, though no refunds are issued upon cancellation. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceTucor: How many valves can one controller run?
The NLP-C addresses up to 500 decoders and 125 sensors across 20 points of connection, with up to 50 programmes.
Pix4Dfields: Can I add cloud processing credits to PIX4Dfields?
Yes, PIX4Dfields subscriptions allow you to add cloud processing credits to your account for additional image processing beyond the standard monthly allocation. Credits can be purchased as needed. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceTucor: Can Tucor retrofit a conventional system?
Yes, converting a conventional multi-wire installation to two-wire decoder control is the main reason sites choose it.
Tucor: Who owns Tucor?
It is a privately held company founded in 1995, based in Harmony, Pennsylvania, and independent of the major irrigation manufacturers.
Related pages
More on Pix4Dfields
Other head to heads
- Pix4Dfields vs CropX
- Pix4Dfields vs Granular
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriSync
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel
- Pix4Dfields vs Sentera
- Pix4Dfields vs DroneDeploy
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmCommand
- Pix4Dfields vs Cropio
- Pix4Dfields vs DJI Agriculture
- Pix4Dfields vs OneSoil
- Pix4Dfields vs PrecisionHawk
- Pix4Dfields vs Taranis
- Pix4Dfields vs DTN Agriculture
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmERP
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmLogs
- Pix4Dfields vs Lely Horizon
- Pix4Dfields vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Pix4Dfields vs MyJohnDeere
- Pix4Dfields vs Baseline Irrigation
- Pix4Dfields vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Pix4Dfields vs WiseConn DropControl
- Pix4Dfields vs Galcon
- Pix4Dfields vs Netafim NetBeat
- Pix4Dfields vs Soil Scout
- Pix4Dfields vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Pix4Dfields vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Pix4Dfields vs Valley Irrigation
- Pix4Dfields vs CeresAI
- Pix4Dfields vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Tucor vs CropX
- Tucor vs Granular
- Tucor vs AgriSync
- Tucor vs Bushel
- Tucor vs Sentera
- Tucor vs DroneDeploy
- Tucor vs FarmCommand
- Tucor vs Cropio
- Tucor vs DJI Agriculture
- Tucor vs OneSoil
- Tucor vs PrecisionHawk
- Tucor vs Taranis
- Tucor vs DTN Agriculture
- Tucor vs FarmERP
- Tucor vs FarmLogs
- Tucor vs Lely Horizon
- Tucor vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Tucor vs MyJohnDeere
- Tucor vs Baseline Irrigation
- Tucor vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Tucor vs WiseConn DropControl
- Tucor vs Galcon
- Tucor vs Netafim NetBeat
- Tucor vs Soil Scout
- Tucor vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Tucor vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Tucor vs Valley Irrigation
- Tucor vs CeresAI
- Tucor vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink

