Agriculture · head to head
Pix4Dfields vs Teralytic

Teralytic
Agriculture
Wireless soil probe reading NPK at three depths, sold as an annual per-probe service rather than a sensor
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Pix4Dfields satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year; Teralytic the company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- They diverge on capability: Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pix4Dfields and Teralytic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Pix4Dfields | Teralytic |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $330/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Ios | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pix4Dfields
- Orthomosaic generation
- NDVI & vegetation indices
- Multispectral processing
- Zonation mapping
- Prescription maps
- Stand count
- Export to machinery
- Offline processing
Only in Teralytic
- Wireless NPK sensing
- Three-depth profile
- Soil respiration and aeration
- Long-range radio uplink
- Cloud analytics
- Above-ground sensing
- API access
- Multi-field deployment view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pix4Dfields
- Processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limitsnot Teralytic
- Generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveysnot Teralytic
- Producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinerynot Teralytic
- Agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flightsnot Teralytic
Teralytic
- A research trial that needs continuous nitrogen readings between sampling dates rather than two lab tests a seasonnot Pix4Dfields
- A vegetable grower on sandy ground where leaching after rain makes a fortnightly lab test worthlessnot Pix4Dfields
- An almond or vine operation tracking salinity build-up under drip irrigationnot Pix4Dfields
- An agronomist validating a variable-rate nitrogen prescription against in-ground readingsnot Pix4Dfields
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pix4Dfields
- Satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- Monthly billing is listed at $165.83 per month against $1,990 for a year, so paying monthly costs substantially more
- The software runs only on Windows and macOS, with no Linux build
Teralytic
- The company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- No current pricing is published and reported figures have moved between roughly 300 and 500 US dollars per probe per year, so a buyer cannot model the cost of a hundred-probe deployment without a quote.
- The subscription is mandatory for the probe to report at all, so the up-front hardware payment buys nothing durable and a lapsed account means a field full of dead instruments.
- In-field NPK sensing is scientifically contested and readings need interpretation against soil type and calibration, so agronomists will not treat the numbers as interchangeable with a lab test and many will insist on both.
- Spatial coverage is the unsolved problem: a probe measures one point, soil varies over metres, and covering a field properly multiplies both the hardware and the annual subscription by the number of zones you care about.
Pricing, plan by plan
Pix4Dfields
$330/month- Monthly$330/month
- RGB & multispectral processing
- Vegetation indices
- Zonation maps
- Annual$2640/year
- Everything in Monthly
- 33% savings
- Priority support
- Perpetual$5500/one-time
- Lifetime license
- 1 year updates
- Local processing
Teralytic
On request- Teralytic Soil Probe$undefined/year
- Probe purchased or supplied with an annual per-probe subscription
- Subscription covers hardware, network, software and analytics
- Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 USD per probe per year
Which should you pick?
Choose Pix4Dfields if
- You need orthomosaic generation.
- You work on Windows, Ios.
- You also want ndvi & vegetation indices.
Choose Teralytic if
- You need wireless npk sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-depth profile.
Questions people ask
- Is Pix4Dfields or Teralytic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and Teralytic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pix4Dfields or Teralytic?
- Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and Teralytic at On request.
- Does Pix4Dfields or Teralytic run on more platforms?
- Pix4Dfields runs on Windows, Ios. Teralytic runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Pix4Dfields best used for?
- Pix4Dfields is most often used for processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits, generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys, producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinery, agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flights. Of those, processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits and generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys are not what Teralytic is typically brought in for.
- What can Pix4Dfields do that Teralytic cannot?
- Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, NDVI & vegetation indices, Multispectral processing, Zonation mapping. Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing, Three-depth profile, Soil respiration and aeration, Long-range radio uplink.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pix4Dfields: How much does PIX4Dfields cost?
PIX4Dfields costs $111 per month for a monthly subscription plan. The software offers actionable data and insights from drone imagery for high efficiency and productivity in precision agriculture. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceTeralytic: Can I buy the probe without a subscription?
No. The probe reports through Teralytic’s network into its cloud, and without an active subscription it does not deliver data.
Pix4Dfields: Does PIX4Dfields offer a free trial?
Yes, PIX4Dfields provides a free 15-day trial that requires no credit card to start. You can cancel before renewal without incurring charges, though no refunds are issued upon cancellation. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceTeralytic: Does it replace lab soil tests?
No. It gives continuous in-season trend data. Most agronomists will still want lab results for absolute nutrient values and for compliance records.
Pix4Dfields: Can I add cloud processing credits to PIX4Dfields?
Yes, PIX4Dfields subscriptions allow you to add cloud processing credits to your account for additional image processing beyond the standard monthly allocation. Credits can be purchased as needed. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceTeralytic: How much does it cost?
Teralytic does not publish current pricing. Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 US dollars per probe per year including hardware and connectivity.
Teralytic: How many probes does a field need?
That depends on soil variability. One probe represents one point, so a field with several distinct soil zones needs one per zone to be meaningful.
Related pages
More on Pix4Dfields
Other head to heads
- Pix4Dfields vs CropX
- Pix4Dfields vs Granular
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriSync
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel
- Pix4Dfields vs Sentera
- Pix4Dfields vs DroneDeploy
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmCommand
- Pix4Dfields vs Cropio
- Pix4Dfields vs DJI Agriculture
- Pix4Dfields vs OneSoil
- Pix4Dfields vs PrecisionHawk
- Pix4Dfields vs Taranis
- Pix4Dfields vs DTN Agriculture
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmERP
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmLogs
- Pix4Dfields vs Lely Horizon
- Pix4Dfields vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Pix4Dfields vs MyJohnDeere
- Pix4Dfields vs Arable
- Pix4Dfields vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Pix4Dfields vs Soil Scout
- Pix4Dfields vs John Deere Operations Center
- Pix4Dfields vs CeresAI
- Pix4Dfields vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag Leader
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWater
- Pix4Dfields vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Pix4Dfields vs Tend
- Pix4Dfields vs Traction
- Pix4Dfields vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Pix4Dfields vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Pix4Dfields vs Connecterra
- Teralytic vs CropX
- Teralytic vs Granular
- Teralytic vs AgriSync
- Teralytic vs Bushel
- Teralytic vs Sentera
- Teralytic vs DroneDeploy
- Teralytic vs FarmCommand
- Teralytic vs Cropio
- Teralytic vs DJI Agriculture
- Teralytic vs OneSoil
- Teralytic vs PrecisionHawk
- Teralytic vs Taranis
- Teralytic vs DTN Agriculture
- Teralytic vs FarmERP
- Teralytic vs FarmLogs
- Teralytic vs Lely Horizon
- Teralytic vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Teralytic vs MyJohnDeere
- Teralytic vs Arable
- Teralytic vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Teralytic vs Soil Scout
- Teralytic vs John Deere Operations Center
- Teralytic vs CeresAI
- Teralytic vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Teralytic vs Ag Leader
- Teralytic vs AgriWater
- Teralytic vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Teralytic vs Tend
- Teralytic vs Traction
- Teralytic vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Teralytic vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Connecterra

