Software · head to head
Arable vs Pix4Dfields
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arable requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription; Pix4Dfields satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- They diverge on capability: Arable covers Weather monitoring, Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arable and Pix4Dfields actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arable | Pix4Dfields |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | $330/month |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Hardware | Windows, Ios |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arable
- Weather monitoring
- Evapotranspiration
- Chlorophyll index
- Disease risk models
- Growth stage tracking
- Climate FieldView
- GDPR
- Web support
Only in Pix4Dfields
- Orthomosaic generation
- NDVI & vegetation indices
- Multispectral processing
- Zonation mapping
- Prescription maps
- Stand count
- Export to machinery
- Offline processing
Both cover
- John Deere
- Trimble
- SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arable
- In-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensornot Pix4Dfields
- Irrigation scheduling based on measured conditionsnot Pix4Dfields
- Water sustainability reporting for enterprise growersnot Pix4Dfields
- Weather risk management across dispersed fieldsnot Pix4Dfields
Pix4Dfields
- Processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limitsnot Arable
- Generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveysnot Arable
- Producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinerynot Arable
- Agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flightsnot Arable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arable
- Requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription
- Pricing is not published and goes through a sales conversation
- Aimed at enterprise growers and advisors rather than smallholders
Pix4Dfields
- Satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- Monthly billing is listed at $165.83 per month against $1,990 for a year, so paying monthly costs substantially more
- The software runs only on Windows and macOS, with no Linux build
Pricing, plan by plan
Arable
$29/month- Standard$1200/device/year
- Weather data
- Crop stress
- Basic analytics
- Premium$2400/device/year
- Full analytics
- Disease models
- API access
Pix4Dfields
$330/month- Monthly$330/month
- RGB & multispectral processing
- Vegetation indices
- Zonation maps
- Annual$2640/year
- Everything in Monthly
- 33% savings
- Priority support
- Perpetual$5500/one-time
- Lifetime license
- 1 year updates
- Local processing
Which should you pick?
Choose Arable if
- You need weather monitoring.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want evapotranspiration.
Choose Pix4Dfields if
- You need orthomosaic generation.
- You work on Windows, Ios.
- You also want ndvi & vegetation indices.
Questions people ask
- Is Arable or Pix4Dfields better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arable starts at $29/month and Pix4Dfields at $330/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arable or Pix4Dfields?
- Arable starts at $29/month and Pix4Dfields at $330/month.
- Does Arable or Pix4Dfields run on more platforms?
- Arable runs on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware. Pix4Dfields runs on Windows, Ios.
- What is Arable best used for?
- Arable is most often used for in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor, irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions, water sustainability reporting for enterprise growers, weather risk management across dispersed fields. Of those, in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor and irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions are not what Pix4Dfields is typically brought in for.
- What can Arable do that Pix4Dfields cannot?
- Arable covers Weather monitoring, Evapotranspiration, Chlorophyll index, Disease risk models. Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, NDVI & vegetation indices, Multispectral processing, Zonation mapping. Both handle John Deere, Trimble, SSL.
Related pages
More on Pix4Dfields
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Arable vs CropX
- Arable vs Granular
- Arable vs AgriSync
- Arable vs Bushel
- Arable vs Conservis
- Arable vs FarmLogs
- Arable vs MyJohnDeere
- Arable vs 365FarmNet
- Arable vs Ag-Analytics
- Arable vs Ag Leader
- Arable vs AgCode
- Arable vs Agrivi
- Arable vs AgriWater
- Arable vs AgriWebb
- Arable vs Agronomic
- Arable vs Agworld
- Arable vs Bushel Farm
- Arable vs CattleMax
- Pix4Dfields vs CropX
- Pix4Dfields vs Granular
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriSync
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel
- Pix4Dfields vs Conservis
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmLogs
- Pix4Dfields vs MyJohnDeere
- Pix4Dfields vs 365FarmNet
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag-Analytics
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag Leader
- Pix4Dfields vs AgCode
- Pix4Dfields vs Agrivi
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWater
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWebb
- Pix4Dfields vs Agronomic
- Pix4Dfields vs Agworld
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel Farm
- Pix4Dfields vs CattleMax


