Networking · head to head
OpenVPN vs Tasmota

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tasmota
Smart Home
Open-source firmware for ESP8266/ESP32 based devices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer; Tasmota tasmota only runs on Espressif ESP8266, ESP8285, ESP32, ESP32-S and ESP32-C3 chipsets, so devices built on other silicon cannot use it
- They diverge on capability: OpenVPN covers Open source core, Tasmota covers Local Control.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenVPN and Tasmota actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
Only in Tasmota
- Local Control
- MQTT Support
- Web Interface
- OTA Updates
- Home Assistant
- Domoticz
- OpenHAB
- Node-RED
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Tasmota
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Tasmota
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Tasmota
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Tasmota
Tasmota
- Replacing vendor cloud firmware on ESP based smart plugs and switchesnot OpenVPN
- Controlling smart home devices locally over MQTT or HTTPnot OpenVPN
- Integrating off the shelf Wi-Fi devices with Home Assistant without a cloud accountnot OpenVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Tasmota
- Tasmota only runs on Espressif ESP8266, ESP8285, ESP32, ESP32-S and ESP32-C3 chipsets, so devices built on other silicon cannot use it
- Initial installation requires opening the device, bridging GPIO0 to ground during boot and using a 3.3V serial programmer; a 5V programmer damages the chip
- The ESP chip needs at least 150mA at 3.3V, so an underpowered supply causes flashing and stability failures
- The Wi-Fi setup access point stays active for only 3 minutes, after which the device must be power cycled to try again
- The Power Cycle Recovery feature can reset a device to firmware defaults where mains power fluctuates, and the docs advise disabling it in that case
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Tasmota
Free- CommunityFree
- Full firmware
- MQTT
- Web UI
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Choose Tasmota if
- You need local control.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on ESP8266, ESP32, Compatible devices.
- You also want mqtt support.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenVPN or Tasmota better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenVPN starts at Free and Tasmota at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenVPN or Tasmota?
- OpenVPN starts at Free and Tasmota at Free.
- Does OpenVPN or Tasmota run on more platforms?
- OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. Tasmota runs on ESP8266, ESP32, Compatible devices.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenVPN best used for?
- OpenVPN is most often used for a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship, a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee, an organisation with more staff than typical concurrent vpn usage, since access server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accounts, an iot or large-scale deployment needing custom enterprise pricing above 2,000 connections. Of those, a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship and a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee are not what Tasmota is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenVPN do that Tasmota cannot?
- OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier. Tasmota covers Local Control, MQTT Support, Web Interface, OTA Updates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Tasmota: What is the cost of Tasmota?
Tasmota is completely free as open-source firmware for ESP devices. Source code is available on GitHub, and the project accepts donations for continued development.
SourceOpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Tasmota: Can Tasmota be modified and redistributed?
Yes, Tasmota is open-source software allowing users to access, compile, modify, and redistribute builds according to the project LICENSE.
SourceOpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Home Assistant
- OpenVPN vs Apple HomeKit
- OpenVPN vs Amazon Alexa
- OpenVPN vs Google Home
- OpenVPN vs ESPHome
- OpenVPN vs Shelly
- OpenVPN vs OpenHAB
- OpenVPN vs Hubitat Elevation
- OpenVPN vs Node-RED
- OpenVPN vs Aqara
- OpenVPN vs Blynk
- OpenVPN vs Eufy Security
- OpenVPN vs Yale Smart Locks
- OpenVPN vs Yeelight
- OpenVPN vs Z-Wave Alliance
- OpenVPN vs Zigbee Alliance
- OpenVPN vs Homey
- Tasmota vs pfSense
- Tasmota vs ZeroTier
- Tasmota vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Tasmota vs Tailscale
- Tasmota vs Icinga
- Tasmota vs Zabbix
- Tasmota vs Domotz
- Tasmota vs LibreNMS
- Tasmota vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Tasmota vs Twingate
- Tasmota vs Consul
- Tasmota vs OPNsense
- Tasmota vs Nebula
- Tasmota vs ngrok
- Tasmota vs Palo Alto Networks
- Tasmota vs Splunk
- Tasmota vs Home Assistant
- Tasmota vs Apple HomeKit
- Tasmota vs Amazon Alexa
- Tasmota vs Google Home
- Tasmota vs ESPHome
- Tasmota vs Shelly
- Tasmota vs OpenHAB
- Tasmota vs Hubitat Elevation
- Tasmota vs Node-RED
- Tasmota vs Aqara
- Tasmota vs Blynk
- Tasmota vs Eufy Security
- Tasmota vs Yale Smart Locks
- Tasmota vs Yeelight
- Tasmota vs Z-Wave Alliance
- Tasmota vs Zigbee Alliance
- Tasmota vs Homey
