Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

OpenAI API vs Zilliz

OpenAI API logo

OpenAI API

Machine Learning

Hosted API for OpenAI's language, embedding, image and audio models, billed per token

From
$0.15/per-million-tokens
Rated
-
Zilliz logo

Zilliz

Databases

Managed vector database and vector lakebase for AI applications

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Zilliz has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: OpenAI API cost scales with tokens rather than with seats, so a successful feature's bill grows with its adoption, and an interface that lets users paste long documents has no natural ceiling on spend unless you build one yourself.; Zilliz pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
  • They diverge on capability: OpenAI API covers Text and reasoning models, Zilliz covers Vector indexing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which OpenAI API and Zilliz actually diverge.

Attributes where OpenAI API and Zilliz differ
AttributeOpenAI APIZilliz
Starting price$0.15/per-million-tokensFree
Pricing modelusage-basedcontact-sales
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsApiCloud, Self-hosted
CategoryMachine LearningDatabases
Founded20152017

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in OpenAI API

  • Text and reasoning models
  • Embeddings
  • Speech and audio
  • Image generation
  • Function calling
  • Structured outputs
  • Batch processing
  • Prompt caching

Only in Zilliz

  • Vector indexing
  • Distributed architecture
  • SQL interface
  • Tensor support
  • Real-time search
  • Cloud-native
  • Open-source compatible

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

OpenAI API

  • Adding summarisation, drafting or classification to an existing product where building a model would take longer than the product's whole roadmapnot Zilliz
  • Retrieval-augmented question answering over internal documents, using the embedding and generation models togethernot Zilliz
  • Extracting structured records from unstructured text, where schema-constrained output removes most of the parsing problemnot Zilliz
  • Prototyping a language feature quickly to find out whether it is worth the cost of a self-hosted alternative laternot Zilliz

Zilliz

  • Build retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systemsnot OpenAI API
  • Implement semantic search over documentsnot OpenAI API
  • Create multimodal search with text and imagesnot OpenAI API
  • Power recommendation engines with vector similaritynot OpenAI API
  • Enable similarity search on user embeddingsnot OpenAI API

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

OpenAI API

  • Cost scales with tokens rather than with seats, so a successful feature's bill grows with its adoption, and an interface that lets users paste long documents has no natural ceiling on spend unless you build one yourself.
  • Models are deprecated on the vendor's timetable, and a fine-tuned model built on a retired base goes with it, so the tuning work and the data curation behind it must be redone rather than migrated.
  • Behaviour shifts between model versions in ways no test catches unless you wrote one, so prompts tuned over months against a particular snapshot can regress quietly on migration, which makes an evaluation suite a prerequisite rather than an improvement.
  • It cannot run inside your own network, so data residency requirements, air-gapped environments and contracts forbidding third-party processing rule it out regardless of the provider's own security posture.
  • You inherit its availability and its rate limits, so a provider incident is an outage in your product and a traffic spike can be throttled at precisely the moment the feature is proving itself.

Zilliz

  • Pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
  • Operational complexity for self-hosted Milvus deployments
  • Learning curve for those unfamiliar with vector databases
  • Limited built-in analytics compared to some alternatives

Pricing, plan by plan

OpenAI API

$0.15/per-million-tokens
  • GPT-4o mini$0.15/per-million-input-tokens
    • Fast
    • Affordable
  • GPT-4o$5/per-million-input-tokens
    • Multimodal
    • 128K context

Zilliz

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Zilliz review.

Which should you pick?

Choose OpenAI API if

  • You need text and reasoning models.
  • You work on Api.
  • You also want embeddings.

Choose Zilliz if

  • You need vector indexing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
  • You also want distributed architecture.

Questions people ask

Is OpenAI API or Zilliz better?
Neither clearly leads. OpenAI API starts at $0.15/per-million-tokens and Zilliz at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, OpenAI API or Zilliz?
Zilliz has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.15/per-million-tokens for OpenAI API and Free for Zilliz.
Does OpenAI API or Zilliz run on more platforms?
OpenAI API runs on Api. Zilliz runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
Can I use Zilliz for free?
Yes. Zilliz has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OpenAI API starts at $0.15/per-million-tokens.
What is OpenAI API best used for?
OpenAI API is most often used for adding summarisation, drafting or classification to an existing product where building a model would take longer than the product's whole roadmap, retrieval-augmented question answering over internal documents, using the embedding and generation models together, extracting structured records from unstructured text, where schema-constrained output removes most of the parsing problem, prototyping a language feature quickly to find out whether it is worth the cost of a self-hosted alternative later. Of those, adding summarisation, drafting or classification to an existing product where building a model would take longer than the product's whole roadmap and retrieval-augmented question answering over internal documents, using the embedding and generation models together are not what Zilliz is typically brought in for.
What can OpenAI API do that Zilliz cannot?
OpenAI API covers Text and reasoning models, Embeddings, Speech and audio, Image generation. Zilliz covers Vector indexing, Distributed architecture, SQL interface, Tensor support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

OpenAI API: Is my data used to train the models?

API inputs and outputs are not used for training by default, which differs from the consumer product. Retention periods and enterprise terms change, so read the current data usage policy rather than trusting a summary.

Zilliz: What is the difference between Milvus and Zilliz Cloud?

Milvus is the open-source vector database that you can self-host. Zilliz Cloud is the fully managed service built on Milvus that removes operational overhead and handles scaling automatically.

Source
OpenAI API: Can I run these models on my own hardware?

No. The weights are not distributed. If self-hosting is a requirement, you are looking at open-weight models instead, with the operational and quality trade-offs that implies.

Zilliz: How many vectors can Zilliz handle?

Milvus and Zilliz Cloud can store and search billions of vectors through their distributed architecture that separates storage and compute layers.

Source
OpenAI API: How is it priced?

Per token, with input and output priced differently and each model priced differently. Batch processing and cached input prefixes reduce it. The practical consequence is that your bill is a function of prompt design, not just of request count.

Zilliz: Is Milvus open-source?

Yes, Milvus is open-source under the Apache License 2.0 and is part of the LF AI & Data Foundation.

Source
OpenAI API: What is the difference from Azure OpenAI Service?

The same model family delivered by Microsoft under an Azure contract, with Azure identity, networking and regional controls, and a different release cadence for new models. Enterprises with an Azure agreement often choose it for procurement and data residency reasons rather than technical ones.

Zilliz: What pricing does Zilliz Cloud offer?

Zilliz Cloud pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting their team to discuss your specific scale and use case requirements.

Source
OpenAI API: How do I keep the cost under control?

Cap input length, cache repeated prefixes, route easy requests to smaller models, use the batch path where latency does not matter, and set per-user limits before launch rather than after the first surprising invoice.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads