Documentation · head to head
Nuclino vs Starlight

Nuclino
Documentation
Fast team wiki with list, board and graph views of the same content
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Starlight
Documentation
Documentation site framework built on Astro that ships no JavaScript to the reader by default
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nuclino there is no publishing layer, so a public help centre or versioned product documentation cannot live here and has to be maintained in a second tool.; Starlight there is no editing interface, so every correction requires a git client, a Node install and a CI run, which puts documentation changes out of reach for anyone who does not already work in a repository.
- They diverge on capability: Nuclino covers Item graph, Starlight covers File based routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nuclino and Starlight actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Documentation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nuclino
- Item graph
- Multiple collection views
- Real time editing
- Instant search
- Version history
- EU hosting
Only in Starlight
- File based routing
- Pagefind search
- Internationalisation
- Component overrides
- Zero client JavaScript
- Expressive Code blocks
- Auto generated sidebar
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nuclino
- A small company that wants internal process notes searchable without running a wiki platformnot Starlight
- Teams that need to see how internal documents relate to each other rather than filing them in foldersnot Starlight
- Organisations that must keep internal knowledge hosted inside the European Unionnot Starlight
- Replacing scattered shared documents where search, not layout, is the actual problemnot Starlight
Starlight
- A developer tool whose docs live in the same repository as the code and are reviewed in the same pull requestnot Nuclino
- A team that already runs Astro for its marketing site and wants one build pipeline for bothnot Nuclino
- Documentation that must be served from a CDN or an air gapped static host with no search backendnot Nuclino
- A multilingual open source project that needs per locale content trees and untranslated page fallbacknot Nuclino
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nuclino
- There is no publishing layer, so a public help centre or versioned product documentation cannot live here and has to be maintained in a second tool.
- The free plan is capped at roughly fifty items, which a real team passes within weeks, making it a trial rather than a usable tier.
- Per user pricing means occasional readers who open a document twice a month cost the same as the writers who maintain it.
- The editor is intentionally limited, with no databases, relations or page-level templates, so structured content such as a request register needs a different product.
- Export options are limited to Markdown and PDF per item, so moving a large workspace elsewhere is a bulk conversion job rather than a supported migration.
Starlight
- There is no editing interface, so every correction requires a git client, a Node install and a CI run, which puts documentation changes out of reach for anyone who does not already work in a repository.
- Starlight versions track Astro versions, so an Astro major release becomes a documentation site migration on someone else timeline rather than yours.
- Pagefind builds the whole search index at compile time, so build duration and index size grow with page count and large documentation sets pay for it on every deploy.
- There is no analytics, no feedback widget and no page level rating built in, so measuring which pages fail readers means wiring a third party script yourself.
- Component overrides are limited to the slots the theme exposes, and anything outside those slots means forking the theme and inheriting the merge burden on every upgrade.
Pricing, plan by plan
Nuclino
Free- FreeFree
- Around 50 items in total
- Limited storage
- Core editing and search
- Starter$6/month
- Per user per month
- Unlimited items and version history
- Larger file uploads
- Business$12/month
- Per user per month
- Single sign-on and admin controls
- Private workspaces and audit features
Starlight
Free- Open sourceFree
- MIT licence
- All features included
- Self hosted on any static host
Which should you pick?
Choose Nuclino if
- You need item graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want multiple collection views.
Choose Starlight if
- You need file based routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want pagefind search.
Questions people ask
- Is Nuclino or Starlight better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nuclino starts at Free and Starlight at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nuclino or Starlight?
- Nuclino starts at Free and Starlight at Free.
- Does Nuclino or Starlight run on more platforms?
- Nuclino runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Starlight runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Nuclino for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nuclino best used for?
- Nuclino is most often used for a small company that wants internal process notes searchable without running a wiki platform, teams that need to see how internal documents relate to each other rather than filing them in folders, organisations that must keep internal knowledge hosted inside the european union, replacing scattered shared documents where search, not layout, is the actual problem. Of those, a small company that wants internal process notes searchable without running a wiki platform and teams that need to see how internal documents relate to each other rather than filing them in folders are not what Starlight is typically brought in for.
- What can Nuclino do that Starlight cannot?
- Nuclino covers Item graph, Multiple collection views, Real time editing, Instant search. Starlight covers File based routing, Pagefind search, Internationalisation, Component overrides.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nuclino: Can Nuclino publish a public documentation site?
No. Individual items can be shared by link, but there is no branded, versioned public site.
Starlight: Can a non technical writer publish a page without help?
No. There is no content management interface. Every change is a commit, a pull request and a build.
Nuclino: Where is the data stored?
In the European Union, by a company registered in Germany, which is usually the reason procurement shortlists it.
Starlight: Do I need to know Astro to use it?
Not for basic use. Markdown files and a config file are enough until you want custom components, at which point Astro knowledge becomes mandatory.
Nuclino: Does it handle translated content?
No. There is no locale model, so translations would be separate items kept in sync by hand.
Starlight: Is search included or do I pay for it?
Included and free. Pagefind builds a static index at compile time. Algolia DocSearch is optional if you want hosted search instead.
Starlight: What happens when Astro releases a major version?
Starlight follows it, and your site needs a migration. Read the upgrade guide before pinning a version for a long lived project.
Starlight: Can I self host with no external services?
Yes. The output is static HTML, CSS and a search index. Nothing calls out at runtime unless you add it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nuclino vs Outline
- Nuclino vs BookStack
- Nuclino vs GitBook
- Nuclino vs Slab
- Nuclino vs Paligo
- Nuclino vs Adobe RoboHelp
- Nuclino vs Antora
- Nuclino vs Archbee
- Nuclino vs MadCap Flare
- Nuclino vs ReadMe
- Nuclino vs Guidde
- Nuclino vs Scalar
- Nuclino vs VitePress
- Nuclino vs Sphinx
- Nuclino vs MkDocs
- Nuclino vs Fumadocs
- Nuclino vs Docsify
- Nuclino vs HelpDocs
- Nuclino vs Adobe FrameMaker
- Starlight vs Outline
- Starlight vs BookStack
- Starlight vs GitBook
- Starlight vs Slab
- Starlight vs Paligo
- Starlight vs Adobe RoboHelp
- Starlight vs Antora
- Starlight vs Archbee
- Starlight vs MadCap Flare
- Starlight vs ReadMe
- Starlight vs Guidde
- Starlight vs Scalar
- Starlight vs VitePress
- Starlight vs Sphinx
- Starlight vs MkDocs
- Starlight vs Fumadocs
- Starlight vs Docsify
- Starlight vs HelpDocs
- Starlight vs Adobe FrameMaker
