Cybersecurity · head to head
NICE Actimize vs Tenable

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- They diverge on capability: NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NICE Actimize and Tenable actually diverge.
| Attribute | NICE Actimize | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3500/year |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Cloud, Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Tenable
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Tenable
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Tenable
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot NICE Actimize
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot NICE Actimize
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot NICE Actimize
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot NICE Actimize
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot NICE Actimize
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is NICE Actimize or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. NICE Actimize starts at On request and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NICE Actimize or Tenable?
- NICE Actimize starts at On request and Tenable at $3500/year.
- Does NICE Actimize or Tenable run on more platforms?
- NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- What is NICE Actimize best used for?
- NICE Actimize is most often used for a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise, a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications, a regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governance, a payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch aml monitoring. Of those, a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise and a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can NICE Actimize do that Tenable cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection. Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceNICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
Tenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceNICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Tenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceRelated pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs Netwrix
- NICE Actimize vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- NICE Actimize vs Qualys VMDR
- NICE Actimize vs Aikido
- NICE Actimize vs Arnica
- NICE Actimize vs Doppler
- NICE Actimize vs Chainguard
- NICE Actimize vs Speakeasy
- NICE Actimize vs Sysdig
- NICE Actimize vs Endor Labs
- NICE Actimize vs Tanium
- NICE Actimize vs Enpass
- NICE Actimize vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- NICE Actimize vs Fortinet FortiGate
- NICE Actimize vs HID Global
- NICE Actimize vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Silent Eight
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Quantexa
- Tenable vs Feedzai
- Tenable vs Unit21
- Tenable vs Fenergo
- Tenable vs Sardine
- Tenable vs ThetaRay
- Tenable vs Transmit Security
- Tenable vs Socure
- Tenable vs Sumsub
- Tenable vs Jumio
- Tenable vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs RoboForm
- Tenable vs Semperis
- Tenable vs SentinelOne
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
