Cybersecurity · head to head
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs NICE Actimize

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Cybersecurity
Enterprise endpoint security built into Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales; NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and NICE Actimize actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | NICE Actimize |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Founded | 1975 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Threat & vulnerability management
- Attack surface reduction
- Next-gen protection
- EDR
- Auto investigation
- Microsoft Threat Experts
- Threat analytics
- Secure score
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Enterprise endpoint security across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS via Plans 1 or 2not NICE Actimize
- Small and medium-sized businesses using Microsoft Defender for Business as alternativenot NICE Actimize
- Organisations using Microsoft 365 E5 which includes Defender for Endpoint Plan 2not NICE Actimize
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 do not include server licenses; additional licensing required for server protection
- Specific feature differences between Plan 1 and Plan 2 require consulting Microsoft documentation
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint review.
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if
- You need threat & vulnerability management.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want attack surface reduction.
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint or NICE Actimize better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint starts at On request and NICE Actimize at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint or NICE Actimize?
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint starts at On request and NICE Actimize at On request.
- Does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint or NICE Actimize run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint best used for?
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most often used for enterprise endpoint security across windows, macos, linux, android, and ios via plans 1 or 2, small and medium-sized businesses using microsoft defender for business as alternative, organisations using microsoft 365 e5 which includes defender for endpoint plan 2. Of those, enterprise endpoint security across windows, macos, linux, android, and ios via plans 1 or 2 and small and medium-sized businesses using microsoft defender for business as alternative are not what NICE Actimize is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Defender for Endpoint do that NICE Actimize cannot?
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, Attack surface reduction, Next-gen protection, EDR. NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: How is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint priced?
Defender for Endpoint is bundled into Microsoft 365 enterprise subscriptions. Plan 1 is included in Microsoft 365 E3, and Plan 2 is included in Microsoft 365 E5. Individual pricing is not published separately.
SourceNICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offer a trial?
Yes. A free trial is available for prospective customers to test the product before committing to a subscription.
SourceNICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: What is the difference between Plan 1 and Plan 2?
Plan 1 (in E3) includes unified security tools, device controls, network protection, firewall, web/URL controls, APIs, SIEM connectors, and app controls. Plan 2 (in E5) adds endpoint detection and response, deception techniques, automatic attack disruption, exposure management, and threat intelligence.
SourceNICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs 1Password
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs LastPass
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sophos Intercept X
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Darktrace
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Akeyless
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DataGrail
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Delinea
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Doppler
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Envysion
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Feedzai
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Silent Eight
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Quantexa
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Unit21
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Fenergo
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sardine
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThetaRay
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Transmit Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Socure
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sumsub
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Jumio
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Recorded Future
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs RoboForm
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne Singularity
- NICE Actimize vs Bitdefender Total Security
- NICE Actimize vs 1Password
- NICE Actimize vs Norton 360
- NICE Actimize vs LastPass
- NICE Actimize vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- NICE Actimize vs VMware Carbon Black
- NICE Actimize vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- NICE Actimize vs Sophos Intercept X
- NICE Actimize vs Trend Micro Vision One
- NICE Actimize vs Darktrace
- NICE Actimize vs Akeyless
- NICE Actimize vs DataGrail
- NICE Actimize vs Delinea
- NICE Actimize vs Doppler
- NICE Actimize vs Envysion
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
