Softwr

Web Development · head to head

Next.js vs Preact

Next.js logo

Next.js

Web Development

The React framework for the web

From
Free
Rated
-
Preact logo

Preact

Web Development

3kB alternative to React with the same modern API

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Next.js opinionated architecture reduces flexibility compared to using React alone with separate libraries; Preact compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
  • They diverge on capability: Next.js covers Server-side rendering, Preact covers 3kB runtime.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Next.js and Preact actually diverge.

Attributes where Next.js and Preact differ
AttributeNext.jsPreact
Pricing modelUnknownOpen source, no licence fee
PlatformsNode.js, Edge Runtime, Vercel, Web browsersWeb
Founded2016Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Web Development).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Next.js

  • Server-side rendering
  • Static site generation
  • API routes
  • Automatic code splitting
  • Built-in CSS support
  • Image optimization
  • File-based routing
  • TypeScript support

Only in Preact

  • 3kB runtime
  • preact/compat
  • Same modern API
  • Fast rendering

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Next.js

  • E-commerce websitesnot Preact
  • Static websitesnot Preact
  • Server-side rendered appsnot Preact
  • Jamstack applicationsnot Preact
  • Progressive web appsnot Preact

Preact

  • Embedded widgets that load inside someone else’s page and must stay smallnot Next.js
  • Marketing and content sites where JavaScript payload affects Core Web Vitalsnot Next.js
  • Applications targeting low-bandwidth or low-powered devicesnot Next.js

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Next.js

  • Opinionated architecture reduces flexibility compared to using React alone with separate libraries
  • Required build and deployment infrastructure adds complexity for beginners
  • Server Components paradigm represents significant mental model shift from traditional client-side React
  • Async request handling in version 15 requires relearning APIs (params, cookies, headers now require await)
  • Lock-in to Vercel ecosystem for optimal performance, though other platforms are supported

Preact

  • Compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
  • Behavioural differences from React exist in edge cases, particularly around event handling
  • A much smaller community, so unusual problems have fewer existing answers than React

Pricing, plan by plan

Next.js

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Next.js review.

Preact

Free
  • PreactFree
    • Full library
    • Commercial use permitted
    • No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose Next.js if

  • You need server-side rendering.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Node.js, Edge Runtime, Vercel, Web browsers.
  • You also want static site generation.

Choose Preact if

  • You need 3kb runtime.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want preact/compat.

Questions people ask

Is Next.js or Preact better?
Neither clearly leads. Next.js starts at Free and Preact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Next.js or Preact?
Next.js starts at Free and Preact at Free.
Does Next.js or Preact run on more platforms?
Next.js runs on Node.js, Edge Runtime, Vercel, Web browsers. Preact runs on Web.
Can I use Next.js for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Next.js best used for?
Next.js is most often used for e-commerce websites, static websites, server-side rendered apps, jamstack applications. Of those, e-commerce websites and static websites are not what Preact is typically brought in for.
What can Next.js do that Preact cannot?
Next.js covers Server-side rendering, Static site generation, API routes, Automatic code splitting. Preact covers 3kB runtime, preact/compat, Same modern API, Fast rendering.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Next.js: Is Next.js free?

Yes. Next.js is free, open-source software built on React and maintained by Vercel. The framework itself has no licensing costs. Hosting and deployment fees depend on your chosen platform.

Source
Preact: Is Preact free?

Yes, open source under the MIT licence.

Next.js: What are the key features of Next.js?

Next.js includes Server-Side Rendering (SSR), Static Site Generation (SSG), Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR), file-based routing, API routes, automatic code splitting, image optimization, and built-in performance optimizations that typically result in 90+ Lighthouse scores.

Source
Preact: Can I use React libraries with Preact?

Most, through the preact/compat layer. Compatibility is good but not complete, so libraries relying on React internals can break.

Next.js: Can I host Next.js applications for free?

Yes. Vercel offers a free Hobby tier for Next.js applications. Netlify and other platforms also provide free hosting tiers with generous bandwidth and build limits for testing and personal projects.

Source
Preact: Why choose Preact over React?

Bundle size, almost always. If payload is not a binding constraint, React’s ecosystem is usually the better trade.

Next.js: Does Next.js require a build step?

Yes. Next.js requires a build step (next build) before deployment to production. This compiles your application and prepares it for optimal performance, though local development runs directly without this step.

Source
Next.js: What is React Server Components in Next.js?

React Server Components are a feature in Next.js that allow components to run on the server, reducing JavaScript sent to clients and improving security by keeping sensitive data server-side. They became stable in Next.js 15.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads