Automation Integration · head to head
Nango vs Penpot

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.; Penpot smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- They diverge on capability: Nango covers Managed OAuth, Penpot covers Vector editing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nango and Penpot actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
Only in Penpot
- Vector editing
- Interactive prototyping
- Design systems
- Components & libraries
- Real-time collaboration
- SVG support
- CSS Grid & Flexbox
- Code export
Both cover
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot Penpot
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot Penpot
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot Penpot
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot Penpot
Penpot
- UI/UX designnot Nango
- Prototypingnot Nango
- Design systemsnot Nango
- Developer handoffnot Nango
- Open source projectsnot Nango
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
Penpot
- Smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- Self-hosting requires Linux server and Docker knowledge for technical setup
- Real-time collaboration features may have performance issues with very large design files
Pricing, plan by plan
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
Penpot
Free- FreeFree
- Cloud-based design
- Real-time collaboration
- Components and variants
- Unlimited$7/month
- All free features
- Priority support
- Advanced cloud features
- Enterprise$950/month
- Custom enterprise features
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Choose Penpot if
- You need vector editing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want interactive prototyping.
Questions people ask
- Is Nango or Penpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nango starts at Free and Penpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nango or Penpot?
- Nango starts at Free and Penpot at Free.
- Does Nango or Penpot run on more platforms?
- Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker. Penpot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Nango for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nango best used for?
- Nango is most often used for a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each, a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them, a company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendor, an engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in production. Of those, a saas product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain oauth and token refresh for each and a team that needs a niche or internal api integrated, which closed unified api vendors will not build for them are not what Penpot is typically brought in for.
- What can Nango do that Penpot cannot?
- Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync. Penpot covers Vector editing, Interactive prototyping, Design systems, Components & libraries. Both handle Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
Penpot: Is Penpot really free?
Yes. Penpot is completely free with no feature gates. The open-source version can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure for zero cost beyond server expenses.
SourceNango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
Penpot: Can I self-host Penpot?
Yes. Penpot can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure with no licensing costs. Organizations with specific privacy or governance needs can run Penpot on their own servers.
SourceNango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
Penpot: What are the paid plans if I use Penpot cloud?
Penpot's cloud service offers a free tier, Unlimited plan at $7 per user per month for professionals and medium teams, and Enterprise starting at $950 per month for larger organizations.
SourceNango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Penpot: What platforms does Penpot support?
Penpot runs in the browser, so it works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and any OS with a web browser. No platform-specific downloads required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs n8n
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Keycloak
- Nango vs Visual Studio Code
- Nango vs Soketi
- Nango vs Ansible
- Nango vs Helix
- Nango vs GNU Emacs
- Nango vs Bazel
- Nango vs Eclipse IDE
- Nango vs Pants Build
- Nango vs Swagger UI
- Nango vs Atlantis
- Nango vs Coder
- Nango vs StackBlitz
- Nango vs Steampipe
- Nango vs Tilt
- Nango vs WarpBuild
- Nango vs Webpack
- Nango vs Avo
- Penpot vs Alloy Automation
- Penpot vs Merge
- Penpot vs n8n
- Penpot vs Paragon
- Penpot vs Windmill
- Penpot vs Meltano
- Penpot vs RudderStack
- Penpot vs Flowable
- Penpot vs Grouparoo
- Penpot vs Airbyte
- Penpot vs Cyclr
- Penpot vs Activiti
- Penpot vs Prefect
- Penpot vs Workato
- Penpot vs Automation Anywhere
- Penpot vs Blue Prism
- Penpot vs CrewAI
- Penpot vs Keycloak
- Penpot vs Visual Studio Code
- Penpot vs Soketi
- Penpot vs Ansible
- Penpot vs Helix
- Penpot vs GNU Emacs
- Penpot vs Bazel
- Penpot vs Eclipse IDE
- Penpot vs Pants Build
- Penpot vs Swagger UI
- Penpot vs Atlantis
- Penpot vs Coder
- Penpot vs StackBlitz
- Penpot vs Steampipe
- Penpot vs Tilt
- Penpot vs WarpBuild
- Penpot vs Webpack
- Penpot vs Avo

