Softwr

Developer Tools · head to head

Moonrepo vs Very Good Security

Moonrepo logo

Moonrepo

Developer Tools

Monorepo build system and version manager platform

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Very Good Security logo

Very Good Security

Cybersecurity

Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope

From
$1000/month
Free plan
No

The short version

  • Only Moonrepo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Moonrepo smaller community compared to established build systems like Bazel; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
  • They diverge on capability: Moonrepo covers Task orchestration, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Moonrepo and Very Good Security actually diverge.

Attributes where Moonrepo and Very Good Security differ
AttributeMoonrepoVery Good Security
Starting priceFree$1000/month
Pricing modelopen-sourcePer month
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, CLIWeb, API
CategoryDeveloper ToolsCybersecurity

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Moonrepo

  • Task orchestration
  • Smart hashing
  • Dependency analysis
  • Multi-language version management
  • Contextual detection
  • Integrated development environment
  • Git integration

Only in Very Good Security

  • Aliasing proxy
  • PCI scope reduction
  • Network tokenisation
  • Processor optionality
  • Card issuing data
  • Vault and access controls
  • Data residency options
  • Compliance artefacts

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Moonrepo

  • Managing multiple language projects in a single repositorynot Very Good Security
  • Automating developer environment setup with consistent toolchain versionsnot Very Good Security
  • Optimizing monorepo builds with intelligent task cachingnot Very Good Security
  • Enforcing consistent development practices across distributed teamsnot Very Good Security

Very Good Security

  • A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Moonrepo
  • A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Moonrepo
  • A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Moonrepo
  • A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Moonrepo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Moonrepo

  • Smaller community compared to established build systems like Bazel
  • Limited integrations with enterprise CI/CD platforms
  • Documentation gaps in some advanced use cases
  • No commercial support option for organizations requiring guaranteed SLAs

Very Good Security

  • VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
  • Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
  • Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
  • Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
  • Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.

Pricing, plan by plan

Moonrepo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Moonrepo review.

Very Good Security

$1000/month
  • Starter$1000/month
    • Aliasing proxy
    • Vault storage
    • PCI scope reduction
  • Growth$undefined/month
    • Network tokenisation
    • Multiple processors
    • Data residency options
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom vault architecture
    • Dedicated support and SLA
    • Contractual compliance coverage

Which should you pick?

Choose Moonrepo if

  • You need task orchestration.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, CLI.
  • You also want smart hashing.

Choose Very Good Security if

  • You need aliasing proxy.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want pci scope reduction.

Questions people ask

Is Moonrepo or Very Good Security better?
Neither clearly leads. Moonrepo starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Moonrepo or Very Good Security?
Moonrepo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Moonrepo and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
Does Moonrepo or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
Moonrepo runs on Web, CLI. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
Can I use Moonrepo for free?
Yes. Moonrepo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
What is Moonrepo best used for?
Moonrepo is most often used for managing multiple language projects in a single repository, automating developer environment setup with consistent toolchain versions, optimizing monorepo builds with intelligent task caching, enforcing consistent development practices across distributed teams. Of those, managing multiple language projects in a single repository and automating developer environment setup with consistent toolchain versions are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
What can Moonrepo do that Very Good Security cannot?
Moonrepo covers Task orchestration, Smart hashing, Dependency analysis, Multi-language version management. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Moonrepo: What programming languages does Moonrepo support?

Moonrepo's proto version manager supports Node.js, Python, Go, Rust, Deno, Java, Ruby, and other languages, with the build system moon supporting most modern development stacks.

Source
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?

No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.

Moonrepo: Is Moonrepo suitable for large monorepos?

Yes, Moonrepo is designed to scale to monorepos of any size with intelligent caching and task orchestration to maintain build performance.

Source
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?

Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.

Moonrepo: Can I use just moon or just proto separately?

Yes, moon and proto are independent tools that can be adopted separately or together to address specific team needs.

Source
Very Good Security: What does it cost?

Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.

Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?

No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads