Technology · head to head
Miro vs Wasabi
The short version
- Only Miro has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Miro free tier limited to 3 editable boards; additional boards must be shared as read-only; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Miro covers Infinite canvas, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Miro and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Miro
- Infinite canvas
- Real-time collaboration
- Digital sticky notes
- Diagramming
- Mind mapping
- Video chat
- Screen sharing
- Templates
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- SOC2
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Miro
- Collaborative whiteboarding and diagrammingnot Wasabi
- Team brainstorming and ideation sessionsnot Wasabi
- Project planning and workflow visualisationnot Wasabi
- Remote team collaborationnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Miro
- Media storagenot Miro
- Archive replacementnot Miro
- Ransomware protectionnot Miro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Miro
- Free tier limited to 3 editable boards; additional boards must be shared as read-only
- AI credits heavily restricted: 25 credits per member per month on Starter, 50 on Business
- Enterprise plan requires minimum 30 members
- Large projects with numerous nested objects may impact performance on lower tiers
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Miro
Free- FreeFree
- 3 editable boards
- 7,000+ templates
- Multiple formats (Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban)
- Starter$8/month
- Unlimited boards
- Visitor editing
- High-resolution exports
- Business$20/month
- Unlimited workspaces
- Unlimited guests
- 4,700+ diagramming shapes
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Custom pricing from 30 members
- Enterprise-grade security
- Regional data hosting
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Miro if
- You need infinite canvas.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Miro or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Miro starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Miro or Wasabi?
- Miro has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Miro and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Miro or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Miro runs on Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Miro for free?
- Yes. Miro has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Miro best used for?
- Miro is most often used for collaborative whiteboarding and diagramming, team brainstorming and ideation sessions, project planning and workflow visualisation, remote team collaboration. Of those, collaborative whiteboarding and diagramming and team brainstorming and ideation sessions are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Miro do that Wasabi cannot?
- Miro covers Infinite canvas, Real-time collaboration, Digital sticky notes, Diagramming. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle SOC2.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Miro: How much does Miro cost per month?
Miro offers Free (no cost), Starter at $8/month per member (billed yearly), Business at $20/month per member (billed yearly), and Enterprise with custom pricing from 30 members.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceMiro: Is there a free version of Miro?
Yes, Miro's Free plan includes 3 editable boards, 7,000+ templates, multiple formats, limited AI trial, 250+ integrations, and 100 MCP calls per day.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceMiro: Do organizations get discounts on Miro?
Miro offers education and nonprofit discounts, as well as startup credits of $500-$1,000 for eligible startups.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceMiro: How does annual billing compare to monthly billing?
Annual billing saves 20% compared to monthly billing across all paid tiers on Miro.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Miro vs Lucidchart
- Miro vs Asana
- Miro vs ClickUp
- Miro vs Figma
- Miro vs Linear
- Miro vs Sublime Text
- Miro vs Notion
- Miro vs Monday.com
- Miro vs Pendo
- Miro vs Whimsical
- Miro vs Apache Spark
- Miro vs Excalidraw
- Miro vs GitHub Desktop
- Miro vs Height
- Miro vs Honeycomb
- Miro vs Istio
- Miro vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Miro vs DigitalOcean
- Miro vs Hetzner Cloud
- Miro vs Scaleway
- Miro vs Linode
- Miro vs Vultr
- Miro vs Zeabur
- Miro vs Porter
- Miro vs Contabo
- Miro vs Encore
- Miro vs Google Cloud Platform
- Miro vs Microsoft Azure
- Miro vs HAProxy
- Miro vs IBM Cloud
- Miro vs kind
- Miro vs Koyeb
- Miro vs Kustomize
- Miro vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Lucidchart
- Wasabi vs Asana
- Wasabi vs ClickUp
- Wasabi vs Figma
- Wasabi vs Linear
- Wasabi vs Sublime Text
- Wasabi vs Notion
- Wasabi vs Monday.com
- Wasabi vs Pendo
- Wasabi vs Whimsical
- Wasabi vs Apache Spark
- Wasabi vs Excalidraw
- Wasabi vs GitHub Desktop
- Wasabi vs Height
- Wasabi vs Honeycomb
- Wasabi vs Istio
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


