Cybersecurity · head to head
Mimecast vs Ozone API

Ozone API
APIs
Standards-compliant open banking API layer for banks and regulators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request; Ozone API it provides the API layer, not the core connectivity, so the bulk of the project is still integrating your own core banking systems and that cost is not in the licence.
- They diverge on capability: Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Ozone API covers Multi-standard support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mimecast and Ozone API actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
Only in Ozone API
- Multi-standard support
- Consent management
- Developer portal
- Regulatory reporting
- Premium API monetisation
- Deployment flexibility
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Ozone API
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Ozone API
Ozone API
- A building society facing an open banking compliance deadline with no API team of its ownnot Mimecast
- A bank operating in several jurisdictions that must satisfy different open banking standards at oncenot Mimecast
- A regulator or standards body building national open finance infrastructurenot Mimecast
- A bank wanting to sell premium APIs beyond the regulatory minimum without building entitlement plumbingnot Mimecast
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Ozone API
- It provides the API layer, not the core connectivity, so the bulk of the project is still integrating your own core banking systems and that cost is not in the licence.
- Value is driven by regulatory obligation, so an institution not under a mandate struggles to build a business case for the spend.
- It is a small UK vendor selling to large regulated institutions, which raises procurement and vendor viability questions during bank due diligence.
- Premium API monetisation is a genuine capability but few banks have found real demand, so revenue projections used to justify the purchase often do not materialise.
- Standards evolve continuously and each revision means a change programme in your own systems, even where Ozone absorbs the specification work at the API edge.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Ozone API
On request- Ozone API$undefined/year
- Annual licence or managed service subscription, quoted
- Scaling by institution size, standards in scope and API call volume
- Implementation and core integration charged separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Choose Ozone API if
- You need multi-standard support.
- You work on Web, REST API, Linux.
- You also want consent management.
Questions people ask
- Is Mimecast or Ozone API better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mimecast starts at $4/month and Ozone API at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mimecast or Ozone API?
- Mimecast starts at $4/month and Ozone API at On request.
- Does Mimecast or Ozone API run on more platforms?
- Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration. Ozone API runs on Web, REST API, Linux.
- What is Mimecast best used for?
- Mimecast is most often used for email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks, email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations. Of those, email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks and email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations are not what Ozone API is typically brought in for.
- What can Mimecast do that Ozone API cannot?
- Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking. Ozone API covers Multi-standard support, Consent management, Developer portal, Regulatory reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceOzone API: Is this a competitor to Plaid or TrueLayer?
No, the opposite side. Ozone is bought by the bank exposing data; Plaid and TrueLayer consume it on behalf of third parties.
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceOzone API: Does it connect to my core banking system?
It provides the standards-compliant API surface and adapters, but connecting your core is an integration project you scope separately.
Ozone API: Which standards does it support?
UK Open Banking, Berlin Group, FDX, Consumer Data Right and Gulf regional standards, among others, from one platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs TrueLayer
- Mimecast vs Salt Edge
- Mimecast vs Enable Banking
- Mimecast vs Temenos Transact
- Mimecast vs Tink
- Mimecast vs MX Technologies
- Mimecast vs Akoya
- Mimecast vs Sensedia
- Mimecast vs Tribe Payments
- Mimecast vs Bud Financial
- Mimecast vs Synctera
- Mimecast vs Yodlee
- Mimecast vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Mimecast vs Thredd
- Mimecast vs Thunder Client
- Mimecast vs Toqio
- Mimecast vs Tyk
- Mimecast vs Volt
- Ozone API vs Norton 360
- Ozone API vs 1Password
- Ozone API vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ozone API vs LastPass
- Ozone API vs Proofpoint
- Ozone API vs Nessus
- Ozone API vs Qualys VMDR
- Ozone API vs Doppler
- Ozone API vs Chainguard
- Ozone API vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Ozone API vs Netwrix
- Ozone API vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Ozone API vs Transmit Security
- Ozone API vs TrustArc
- Ozone API vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Ozone API vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ozone API vs Wireshark
- Ozone API vs WorkOS
- Ozone API vs TrueLayer
- Ozone API vs Salt Edge
- Ozone API vs Enable Banking
- Ozone API vs Temenos Transact
- Ozone API vs Tink
- Ozone API vs MX Technologies
- Ozone API vs Akoya
- Ozone API vs Sensedia
- Ozone API vs Tribe Payments
- Ozone API vs Bud Financial
- Ozone API vs Synctera
- Ozone API vs Yodlee
- Ozone API vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Ozone API vs Thredd
- Ozone API vs Thunder Client
- Ozone API vs Toqio
- Ozone API vs Tyk
- Ozone API vs Volt

