Technology · head to head
Microsoft Outlook vs Penpot
Microsoft Outlook
Technology
Microsoft's email and calendar client, in the middle of a transition from the classic Windows application to a web-based replacement.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Penpot
Developer Tools
Open source design and prototyping platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Outlook microsoft is replacing the classic Win32 client with the new web-based Outlook, and the new one runs only web add-ins, not COM add-ins, so any line-of-business integration for CRM, dictation, document management or telephony must be rewritten or the desktop stays on classic until its support window closes.; Penpot smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft Outlook covers Exchange calendar integration, Penpot covers Vector editing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Outlook and Penpot actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Outlook | Penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Technology | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Outlook
- Exchange calendar integration
- Delegate access
- Shared mailboxes
- Rules and Quick Steps
- Retention, hold and eDiscovery
- Sensitivity labels and encryption
- Add-in platform
- Offline cached mode
Only in Penpot
- Vector editing
- Interactive prototyping
- Design systems
- Components & libraries
- Real-time collaboration
- SVG support
- CSS Grid & Flexbox
- Code export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Outlook
- Organisations on Exchange Online or Exchange Server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirementnot Penpot
- Executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no IMAP client supports properlynot Penpot
- Regulated environments that need retention policies, legal hold and eDiscovery applied to mail centrally rather than per usernot Penpot
- Teams handling shared inboxes such as support or accounts, where permissions and tracking matter more than the mail client itselfnot Penpot
Penpot
- UI/UX designnot Microsoft Outlook
- Prototypingnot Microsoft Outlook
- Design systemsnot Microsoft Outlook
- Developer handoffnot Microsoft Outlook
- Open source projectsnot Microsoft Outlook
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Outlook
- Microsoft is replacing the classic Win32 client with the new web-based Outlook, and the new one runs only web add-ins, not COM add-ins, so any line-of-business integration for CRM, dictation, document management or telephony must be rewritten or the desktop stays on classic until its support window closes.
- The new client's handling of non-Microsoft accounts synchronises mail through Microsoft's cloud rather than connecting from the machine to the provider, which several organisations' data residency and handling policies do not allow, and it is not an optional behaviour.
- PST and OST files are a single-file, corruptible and effectively unshareable store, and the new client's reduced PST support means years of personal archives sitting in those files need an explicit migration plan rather than carrying forward.
- Large mailboxes turn software problems into administration ones: search index rebuilds, OST files of tens of gigabytes and the mailbox quotas of whichever plan was bought, and the usual fix is archiving policy rather than anything a user can do.
- Against IMAP or Gmail you lose most of what justifies it, including free/busy lookup, room booking, delegate access, and retention and compliance policies, because those are Exchange server features rather than client features.
- The five or six products sharing the Outlook name have materially different feature sets, so internal documentation, training and support procedures must be written per platform and a user moving between desktop, web and mobile finds the same task done differently in each.
Penpot
- Smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- Self-hosting requires Linux server and Docker knowledge for technical setup
- Real-time collaboration features may have performance issues with very large design files
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Outlook
Free- Outlook (Free)Free
- 15 GB mailbox storage
- 5 GB cloud storage
- Web and mobile Office app access
- Microsoft 365 Basic$1.99/month
- 100 GB mailbox storage
- 100 GB cloud storage
- Ad-free experience
- Microsoft 365 Personal$9.99/month
- 1 TB cloud storage
- Desktop Office apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote)
- Copilot with high usage limits
- Microsoft 365 Family$12.99/month
- 1-6 users
- Up to 6 TB total cloud storage (1 TB per person)
- Same apps and features as Personal
Penpot
Free- FreeFree
- Cloud-based design
- Real-time collaboration
- Components and variants
- Unlimited$7/month
- All free features
- Priority support
- Advanced cloud features
- Enterprise$950/month
- Custom enterprise features
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Outlook if
- You need exchange calendar integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want delegate access.
Choose Penpot if
- You need vector editing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want interactive prototyping.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Outlook or Penpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Outlook starts at Free and Penpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Outlook or Penpot?
- Microsoft Outlook starts at Free and Penpot at Free.
- Does Microsoft Outlook or Penpot run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Outlook runs on Web. Penpot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Microsoft Outlook for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Microsoft Outlook best used for?
- Microsoft Outlook is most often used for organisations on exchange online or exchange server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirement, executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no imap client supports properly, regulated environments that need retention policies, legal hold and ediscovery applied to mail centrally rather than per user, teams handling shared inboxes such as support or accounts, where permissions and tracking matter more than the mail client itself. Of those, organisations on exchange online or exchange server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirement and executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no imap client supports properly are not what Penpot is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Outlook do that Penpot cannot?
- Microsoft Outlook covers Exchange calendar integration, Delegate access, Shared mailboxes, Rules and Quick Steps. Penpot covers Vector editing, Interactive prototyping, Design systems, Components & libraries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Outlook: What is the difference between classic Outlook and the new Outlook for Windows?
Classic is the long-standing Win32 application shipped with Microsoft 365 and Office LTSC. The new Outlook is a web-based client that replaced Windows Mail and Calendar. The most consequential difference is add-ins: the new client supports only web add-ins, not COM add-ins.
Penpot: Is Penpot really free?
Yes. Penpot is completely free with no feature gates. The open-source version can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure for zero cost beyond server expenses.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: How long will classic Outlook be supported?
Microsoft has stated support through at least 2029. That is a planning window rather than a reprieve, and organisations with COM add-in dependencies should be scoping the replacement work now.
Penpot: Can I self-host Penpot?
Yes. Penpot can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure with no licensing costs. Organizations with specific privacy or governance needs can run Penpot on their own servers.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Can I use Outlook with Gmail or another IMAP provider?
Yes, but with reduced capability. You lose free/busy lookup, room booking, delegate access and server-side compliance policies, because those come from Exchange rather than from the client.
Penpot: What are the paid plans if I use Penpot cloud?
Penpot's cloud service offers a free tier, Unlimited plan at $7 per user per month for professionals and medium teams, and Enterprise starting at $950 per month for larger organizations.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Is Outlook free?
Outlook on the web and the mobile apps are free with a Microsoft account, and the new Outlook for Windows is included with Windows 11. The classic desktop application requires a Microsoft 365 subscription or an Office perpetual licence.
Penpot: What platforms does Penpot support?
Penpot runs in the browser, so it works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and any OS with a web browser. No platform-specific downloads required.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Will my COM add-ins work in the new Outlook?
No. The new client supports only the cross-platform web add-in model. Vendors must publish a web add-in, and where they have not, the choice is to stay on classic Outlook or replace the integration.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Outlook
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Outlook vs Safari
- Microsoft Outlook vs Google Chrome
- Microsoft Outlook vs Mozilla Firefox
- Microsoft Outlook vs Thought Machine
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sentry
- Microsoft Outlook vs Apache Spark
- Microsoft Outlook vs GitHub Desktop
- Microsoft Outlook vs MongoDB
- Microsoft Outlook vs Asana
- Microsoft Outlook vs Figma
- Microsoft Outlook vs Greenhouse
- Microsoft Outlook vs Monday.com
- Microsoft Outlook vs Maze
- Microsoft Outlook vs PagerDuty
- Microsoft Outlook vs PyCharm
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sketch
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sublime Text
- Microsoft Outlook vs Keycloak
- Microsoft Outlook vs Soketi
- Microsoft Outlook vs Visual Studio Code
- Microsoft Outlook vs Ansible
- Microsoft Outlook vs Helix
- Microsoft Outlook vs Bazel
- Microsoft Outlook vs Eclipse IDE
- Microsoft Outlook vs Pants Build
- Microsoft Outlook vs Jitsu
- Microsoft Outlook vs Notepad++
- Microsoft Outlook vs Tilt
- Microsoft Outlook vs Backstage
- Microsoft Outlook vs StackBlitz
- Microsoft Outlook vs Steampipe
- Microsoft Outlook vs WarpBuild
- Microsoft Outlook vs Webpack
- Microsoft Outlook vs Avo
- Penpot vs Safari
- Penpot vs Google Chrome
- Penpot vs Mozilla Firefox
- Penpot vs Thought Machine
- Penpot vs Sentry
- Penpot vs Apache Spark
- Penpot vs GitHub Desktop
- Penpot vs MongoDB
- Penpot vs Asana
- Penpot vs Figma
- Penpot vs Greenhouse
- Penpot vs Monday.com
- Penpot vs Maze
- Penpot vs PagerDuty
- Penpot vs PyCharm
- Penpot vs Sketch
- Penpot vs Sublime Text
- Penpot vs Keycloak
- Penpot vs Soketi
- Penpot vs Visual Studio Code
- Penpot vs Ansible
- Penpot vs Helix
- Penpot vs Bazel
- Penpot vs Eclipse IDE
- Penpot vs Pants Build
- Penpot vs Jitsu
- Penpot vs Notepad++
- Penpot vs Tilt
- Penpot vs Backstage
- Penpot vs StackBlitz
- Penpot vs Steampipe
- Penpot vs WarpBuild
- Penpot vs Webpack
- Penpot vs Avo