Technology · head to head
Microsoft Outlook vs Miro
Microsoft Outlook
Technology
Microsoft's email and calendar client, in the middle of a transition from the classic Windows application to a web-based replacement.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Outlook microsoft is replacing the classic Win32 client with the new web-based Outlook, and the new one runs only web add-ins, not COM add-ins, so any line-of-business integration for CRM, dictation, document management or telephony must be rewritten or the desktop stays on classic until its support window closes.; Miro free tier limited to 3 editable boards; additional boards must be shared as read-only
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft Outlook covers Exchange calendar integration, Miro covers Infinite canvas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Outlook and Miro actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Outlook | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Outlook
- Exchange calendar integration
- Delegate access
- Shared mailboxes
- Rules and Quick Steps
- Retention, hold and eDiscovery
- Sensitivity labels and encryption
- Add-in platform
- Offline cached mode
Only in Miro
- Infinite canvas
- Real-time collaboration
- Digital sticky notes
- Diagramming
- Mind mapping
- Video chat
- Screen sharing
- Templates
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Outlook
- Organisations on Exchange Online or Exchange Server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirementnot Miro
- Executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no IMAP client supports properlynot Miro
- Regulated environments that need retention policies, legal hold and eDiscovery applied to mail centrally rather than per usernot Miro
- Teams handling shared inboxes such as support or accounts, where permissions and tracking matter more than the mail client itselfnot Miro
Miro
- Collaborative whiteboarding and diagrammingnot Microsoft Outlook
- Team brainstorming and ideation sessionsnot Microsoft Outlook
- Project planning and workflow visualisationnot Microsoft Outlook
- Remote team collaborationnot Microsoft Outlook
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Outlook
- Microsoft is replacing the classic Win32 client with the new web-based Outlook, and the new one runs only web add-ins, not COM add-ins, so any line-of-business integration for CRM, dictation, document management or telephony must be rewritten or the desktop stays on classic until its support window closes.
- The new client's handling of non-Microsoft accounts synchronises mail through Microsoft's cloud rather than connecting from the machine to the provider, which several organisations' data residency and handling policies do not allow, and it is not an optional behaviour.
- PST and OST files are a single-file, corruptible and effectively unshareable store, and the new client's reduced PST support means years of personal archives sitting in those files need an explicit migration plan rather than carrying forward.
- Large mailboxes turn software problems into administration ones: search index rebuilds, OST files of tens of gigabytes and the mailbox quotas of whichever plan was bought, and the usual fix is archiving policy rather than anything a user can do.
- Against IMAP or Gmail you lose most of what justifies it, including free/busy lookup, room booking, delegate access, and retention and compliance policies, because those are Exchange server features rather than client features.
- The five or six products sharing the Outlook name have materially different feature sets, so internal documentation, training and support procedures must be written per platform and a user moving between desktop, web and mobile finds the same task done differently in each.
Miro
- Free tier limited to 3 editable boards; additional boards must be shared as read-only
- AI credits heavily restricted: 25 credits per member per month on Starter, 50 on Business
- Enterprise plan requires minimum 30 members
- Large projects with numerous nested objects may impact performance on lower tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Outlook
Free- Outlook (Free)Free
- 15 GB mailbox storage
- 5 GB cloud storage
- Web and mobile Office app access
- Microsoft 365 Basic$1.99/month
- 100 GB mailbox storage
- 100 GB cloud storage
- Ad-free experience
- Microsoft 365 Personal$9.99/month
- 1 TB cloud storage
- Desktop Office apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote)
- Copilot with high usage limits
- Microsoft 365 Family$12.99/month
- 1-6 users
- Up to 6 TB total cloud storage (1 TB per person)
- Same apps and features as Personal
Miro
Free- FreeFree
- 3 editable boards
- 7,000+ templates
- Multiple formats (Docs, Tables, Slides, Kanban)
- Starter$8/month
- Unlimited boards
- Visitor editing
- High-resolution exports
- Business$20/month
- Unlimited workspaces
- Unlimited guests
- 4,700+ diagramming shapes
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Custom pricing from 30 members
- Enterprise-grade security
- Regional data hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Outlook if
- You need exchange calendar integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want delegate access.
Choose Miro if
- You need infinite canvas.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Outlook or Miro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Outlook starts at Free and Miro at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Outlook or Miro?
- Microsoft Outlook starts at Free and Miro at Free.
- Does Microsoft Outlook or Miro run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Microsoft Outlook for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Microsoft Outlook best used for?
- Microsoft Outlook is most often used for organisations on exchange online or exchange server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirement, executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no imap client supports properly, regulated environments that need retention policies, legal hold and ediscovery applied to mail centrally rather than per user, teams handling shared inboxes such as support or accounts, where permissions and tracking matter more than the mail client itself. Of those, organisations on exchange online or exchange server where free/busy scheduling and room booking across everyone is a daily requirement and executive assistants managing someone else's calendar and mailbox through delegate access, which no imap client supports properly are not what Miro is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Outlook do that Miro cannot?
- Microsoft Outlook covers Exchange calendar integration, Delegate access, Shared mailboxes, Rules and Quick Steps. Miro covers Infinite canvas, Real-time collaboration, Digital sticky notes, Diagramming.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Outlook: What is the difference between classic Outlook and the new Outlook for Windows?
Classic is the long-standing Win32 application shipped with Microsoft 365 and Office LTSC. The new Outlook is a web-based client that replaced Windows Mail and Calendar. The most consequential difference is add-ins: the new client supports only web add-ins, not COM add-ins.
Miro: How much does Miro cost per month?
Miro offers Free (no cost), Starter at $8/month per member (billed yearly), Business at $20/month per member (billed yearly), and Enterprise with custom pricing from 30 members.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: How long will classic Outlook be supported?
Microsoft has stated support through at least 2029. That is a planning window rather than a reprieve, and organisations with COM add-in dependencies should be scoping the replacement work now.
Miro: Is there a free version of Miro?
Yes, Miro's Free plan includes 3 editable boards, 7,000+ templates, multiple formats, limited AI trial, 250+ integrations, and 100 MCP calls per day.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Can I use Outlook with Gmail or another IMAP provider?
Yes, but with reduced capability. You lose free/busy lookup, room booking, delegate access and server-side compliance policies, because those come from Exchange rather than from the client.
Miro: Do organizations get discounts on Miro?
Miro offers education and nonprofit discounts, as well as startup credits of $500-$1,000 for eligible startups.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Is Outlook free?
Outlook on the web and the mobile apps are free with a Microsoft account, and the new Outlook for Windows is included with Windows 11. The classic desktop application requires a Microsoft 365 subscription or an Office perpetual licence.
Miro: How does annual billing compare to monthly billing?
Annual billing saves 20% compared to monthly billing across all paid tiers on Miro.
SourceMicrosoft Outlook: Will my COM add-ins work in the new Outlook?
No. The new client supports only the cross-platform web add-in model. Vendors must publish a web add-in, and where they have not, the choice is to stay on classic Outlook or replace the integration.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Outlook
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Outlook vs Safari
- Microsoft Outlook vs Google Chrome
- Microsoft Outlook vs Mozilla Firefox
- Microsoft Outlook vs Thought Machine
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sentry
- Microsoft Outlook vs Apache Spark
- Microsoft Outlook vs GitHub Desktop
- Microsoft Outlook vs MongoDB
- Microsoft Outlook vs Asana
- Microsoft Outlook vs Figma
- Microsoft Outlook vs Greenhouse
- Microsoft Outlook vs Monday.com
- Microsoft Outlook vs Maze
- Microsoft Outlook vs PagerDuty
- Microsoft Outlook vs PyCharm
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sketch
- Microsoft Outlook vs Sublime Text
- Microsoft Outlook vs Lucidchart
- Microsoft Outlook vs ClickUp
- Microsoft Outlook vs Linear
- Microsoft Outlook vs Notion
- Microsoft Outlook vs Pendo
- Microsoft Outlook vs Whimsical
- Microsoft Outlook vs Excalidraw
- Microsoft Outlook vs Postman
- Microsoft Outlook vs Raycast
- Microsoft Outlook vs RescueTime
- Microsoft Outlook vs Superhuman
- Microsoft Outlook vs Vim
- Miro vs Safari
- Miro vs Google Chrome
- Miro vs Mozilla Firefox
- Miro vs Thought Machine
- Miro vs Sentry
- Miro vs Apache Spark
- Miro vs GitHub Desktop
- Miro vs MongoDB
- Miro vs Asana
- Miro vs Figma
- Miro vs Greenhouse
- Miro vs Monday.com
- Miro vs Maze
- Miro vs PagerDuty
- Miro vs PyCharm
- Miro vs Sketch
- Miro vs Sublime Text
- Miro vs Lucidchart
- Miro vs ClickUp
- Miro vs Linear
- Miro vs Notion
- Miro vs Pendo
- Miro vs Whimsical
- Miro vs Excalidraw
- Miro vs Postman
- Miro vs Raycast
- Miro vs RescueTime
- Miro vs Superhuman
- Miro vs Vim