Cybersecurity · head to head
MetricStream vs Wireshark

MetricStream
Cybersecurity
Enterprise GRC suite for large regulated organisations, with implementation costs that exceed the licence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Wireshark
Cybersecurity
The world's foremost network protocol analyzer
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Wireshark has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MetricStream implementation typically costs one and a half to two and a half times the first year licence, so a one million dollar licence carries a one and a half to two and a half million dollar rollout that rarely appears in the initial business case.; Wireshark free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: MetricStream covers Enterprise and operational risk, Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MetricStream and Wireshark actually diverge.
| Attribute | MetricStream | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Desktop, Cli |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MetricStream
- Enterprise and operational risk
- Regulatory compliance
- Internal audit
- Third-party risk
- Cyber risk quantification
- Policy and case management
- Content libraries
- ESG reporting
Only in Wireshark
- Deep packet inspection
- Live capture
- Offline analysis
- 3000+ protocol support
- Rich display filters
- VoIP analysis
- Decryption support
- Scripting with Lua
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MetricStream
- A multinational bank mapping one control set against obligations from several regulators and needing to evidence the mapping to examinersnot Wireshark
- An insurer consolidating separate risk, audit and vendor systems that currently produce contradictory numbers to the boardnot Wireshark
- A pharmaceutical company that must track regulatory change across jurisdictions and show what each change affectednot Wireshark
- An organisation whose three lines of defence must share one risk taxonomy rather than three overlapping spreadsheetsnot Wireshark
Wireshark
- Network Securitynot MetricStream
- Packet Analysisnot MetricStream
- Open Sourcenot MetricStream
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MetricStream
- Implementation typically costs one and a half to two and a half times the first year licence, so a one million dollar licence carries a one and a half to two and a half million dollar rollout that rarely appears in the initial business case.
- Full deployment takes six to eighteen months, during which the organisation runs old and new processes in parallel and the promised efficiency gain is negative.
- Per-user pricing in the low thousands per year per seat discourages giving access to the first line of defence, which is precisely where risk data originates, so many deployments end up with data still arriving by spreadsheet.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the price of specialist skills, and organisations become dependent on MetricStream partners or a small internal team, making later changes slow and expensive.
- The interface and workflow feel enterprise-heavy next to modern compliance tools, and infrequent business users find it hard, which suppresses the participation the platform is meant to enable.
Wireshark
- Free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
MetricStream
On request- MetricStream GRC$undefined/year
- Enterprise risk, audit, compliance and third-party modules
- Regulatory content libraries
- Multi-entity and multi-jurisdiction support
Wireshark
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Deep inspection
- Live capture
Which should you pick?
Choose MetricStream if
- You need enterprise and operational risk.
- You also want regulatory compliance.
Choose Wireshark if
- You need deep packet inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want live capture.
Questions people ask
- Is MetricStream or Wireshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. MetricStream starts at On request and Wireshark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MetricStream or Wireshark?
- Wireshark has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for MetricStream and Free for Wireshark.
- Does MetricStream or Wireshark run on more platforms?
- MetricStream runs on Web. Wireshark runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Wireshark for free?
- Yes. Wireshark has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MetricStream starts at On request.
- What is MetricStream best used for?
- MetricStream is most often used for a multinational bank mapping one control set against obligations from several regulators and needing to evidence the mapping to examiners, an insurer consolidating separate risk, audit and vendor systems that currently produce contradictory numbers to the board, a pharmaceutical company that must track regulatory change across jurisdictions and show what each change affected, an organisation whose three lines of defence must share one risk taxonomy rather than three overlapping spreadsheets. Of those, a multinational bank mapping one control set against obligations from several regulators and needing to evidence the mapping to examiners and an insurer consolidating separate risk, audit and vendor systems that currently produce contradictory numbers to the board are not what Wireshark is typically brought in for.
- What can MetricStream do that Wireshark cannot?
- MetricStream covers Enterprise and operational risk, Regulatory compliance, Internal audit, Third-party risk. Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection, Live capture, Offline analysis, 3000+ protocol support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MetricStream: What does MetricStream cost?
It is quoted. Market data suggests roughly 75,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for small enterprise deployments, 250,000 to 500,000 for medium and 750,000 upwards for large.
Wireshark: Is there a cost to download and use Wireshark?
No, Wireshark is completely free. It's distributed under the GNU General Public License version 2, making it "free software" with no demo limitations. The full version is available at no cost.
SourceMetricStream: How long is implementation?
Six to eighteen months for a full platform deployment, and the services cost usually exceeds the first year licence.
Wireshark: What support options are available for Wireshark users?
Wireshark offers multiple support channels including mailing lists, an active Discord community, the Ask Wireshark Q&A platform, comprehensive documentation, a user guide, and developer resources for those needing technical assistance.
SourceMetricStream: Is it right for a mid-market company?
Usually not. Its depth suits organisations with several regulators and formal three lines of defence structures.
Wireshark: Are there different pricing tiers or subscription levels?
Wireshark does not offer pricing tiers or subscriptions. There is one free version available to all users regardless of use case, personal, professional, or organizational.
SourceMetricStream: Does it replace SOC 2 automation tools?
It can cover the framework, but it is not designed for the automated evidence collection those tools do cheaply.
Related pages
More on MetricStream
Other head to heads
- MetricStream vs LogicManager
- MetricStream vs OneTrust
- MetricStream vs Diligent
- MetricStream vs Resolver
- MetricStream vs Rhombus Systems
- MetricStream vs Genetec Security Center
- MetricStream vs Salient CompleteView
- MetricStream vs NICE Actimize
- MetricStream vs Fenergo
- MetricStream vs VMware Carbon Black
- MetricStream vs Jumio
- MetricStream vs Mullvad VPN
- MetricStream vs Sardine
- MetricStream vs Semperis
- MetricStream vs SentinelOne
- MetricStream vs Shufti Pro
- MetricStream vs Signicat
- MetricStream vs SentinelOne Singularity
- MetricStream vs 1Password
- MetricStream vs Bitdefender Total Security
- MetricStream vs Norton 360
- MetricStream vs LastPass
- MetricStream vs Bitwarden
- MetricStream vs OWASP ZAP
- MetricStream vs Syft
- MetricStream vs Metasploit
- MetricStream vs Cosign
- MetricStream vs HashiCorp Vault
- MetricStream vs Infisical
- MetricStream vs Semgrep
- MetricStream vs Google Authenticator
- MetricStream vs Hanwha Vision
- MetricStream vs Idira
- MetricStream vs IVPN
- MetricStream vs Grype
- Wireshark vs LogicManager
- Wireshark vs OneTrust
- Wireshark vs Diligent
- Wireshark vs Resolver
- Wireshark vs Rhombus Systems
- Wireshark vs Genetec Security Center
- Wireshark vs Salient CompleteView
- Wireshark vs NICE Actimize
- Wireshark vs Fenergo
- Wireshark vs VMware Carbon Black
- Wireshark vs Jumio
- Wireshark vs Mullvad VPN
- Wireshark vs Sardine
- Wireshark vs Semperis
- Wireshark vs SentinelOne
- Wireshark vs Shufti Pro
- Wireshark vs Signicat
- Wireshark vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Wireshark vs 1Password
- Wireshark vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Wireshark vs Norton 360
- Wireshark vs LastPass
- Wireshark vs Bitwarden
- Wireshark vs OWASP ZAP
- Wireshark vs Syft
- Wireshark vs Metasploit
- Wireshark vs Cosign
- Wireshark vs HashiCorp Vault
- Wireshark vs Infisical
- Wireshark vs Semgrep
- Wireshark vs Google Authenticator
- Wireshark vs Hanwha Vision
- Wireshark vs Idira
- Wireshark vs IVPN
- Wireshark vs Grype
