Softwr

Web Development · head to head

Chakra UI vs SolidJS

Chakra UI logo

Chakra UI

Web Development

Accessible React component library with a style-props API

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
SolidJS logo

SolidJS

Web Development

Reactive JavaScript framework with no virtual DOM

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Chakra UI style props put styling in the component tree, which some teams find harder to scan than stylesheets; SolidJS much smaller ecosystem than React, so many problems have no off-the-shelf library
  • They diverge on capability: Chakra UI covers Style props, SolidJS covers No virtual DOM.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Chakra UI and SolidJS actually diverge.

Attributes where Chakra UI and SolidJS differ
AttributeChakra UISolidJS

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Web Development).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Chakra UI

  • Style props
  • Accessible defaults
  • Theme system
  • Composable primitives

Only in SolidJS

  • No virtual DOM
  • Components run once
  • JSX syntax
  • Small bundles

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Chakra UI

  • React applications wanting accessible components without Material Design’s looknot SolidJS
  • Teams who find unstyled primitives too much work but styled libraries too opinionatednot SolidJS
  • Rapid internal tools where a coherent theme matters more than a bespoke designnot SolidJS

SolidJS

  • Interfaces where update performance is the binding constraintnot Chakra UI
  • Teams comfortable with React syntax who want finer-grained reactivitynot Chakra UI
  • Applications where bundle size directly affects the businessnot Chakra UI

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Chakra UI

  • Style props put styling in the component tree, which some teams find harder to scan than stylesheets
  • Runtime CSS-in-JS has a performance cost, and it interacts awkwardly with React server components
  • Fewer complex widgets than MUI: no comparable data grid or date picker
  • Major version changes have altered the styling approach, making upgrades non-trivial

SolidJS

  • Much smaller ecosystem than React, so many problems have no off-the-shelf library
  • The React-like syntax is misleading: components run once, and React habits produce subtle bugs
  • Smaller hiring pool and fewer learning resources than the mainstream frameworks

Pricing, plan by plan

Chakra UI

Free
  • Chakra UIFree
    • Full functionality
    • No usage limits
    • Community support

SolidJS

Free
  • SolidJSFree
    • Full library
    • Commercial use permitted
    • No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose Chakra UI if

  • You need style props.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want accessible defaults.
Chakra UI review

Choose SolidJS if

  • You need no virtual dom.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want components run once.
SolidJS review

Questions people ask

Is Chakra UI or SolidJS better?
Neither clearly leads. Chakra UI starts at Free and SolidJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Chakra UI or SolidJS?
Chakra UI starts at Free and SolidJS at Free.
Does Chakra UI or SolidJS run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Chakra UI for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Chakra UI best used for?
Chakra UI is most often used for react applications wanting accessible components without material design’s look, teams who find unstyled primitives too much work but styled libraries too opinionated, rapid internal tools where a coherent theme matters more than a bespoke design. Of those, react applications wanting accessible components without material design’s look and teams who find unstyled primitives too much work but styled libraries too opinionated are not what SolidJS is typically brought in for.
What can Chakra UI do that SolidJS cannot?
Chakra UI covers Style props, Accessible defaults, Theme system, Composable primitives. SolidJS covers No virtual DOM, Components run once, JSX syntax, Small bundles.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Chakra UI: Is Chakra UI free?

Yes, open source under the MIT licence.

SolidJS: Is SolidJS free?

Yes, open source under the MIT licence.

Chakra UI: Chakra UI or MUI?

MUI has more components including advanced data grids, but carries Material Design opinions. Chakra is lighter on visual opinion and easier to theme, with a smaller component set.

SolidJS: Is SolidJS just React without the virtual DOM?

The syntax is similar but the model is not. Solid components run once and reactivity is fine-grained, so patterns that are correct in React can be wrong in Solid.

Chakra UI: Does Chakra handle accessibility?

Yes, components implement WAI-ARIA patterns by default, which is one of its stated design goals.

SolidJS: Why is SolidJS fast?

It compiles away much of the framework and updates individual DOM nodes directly, rather than re-rendering components and diffing a virtual DOM.

Share

Related pages

More on Chakra UI

More on SolidJS

Keep looking

Other head to heads