Manufacturing · head to head
Maintenance Connection vs Stoll

Maintenance Connection
Manufacturing
Enterprise CMMS from Accruent for multi-site asset management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Maintenance Connection implementation is a project measured in months, and the cost of that work frequently exceeds the first year of licensing; Stoll no pricing available; the flat knitting machine business has been discontinued
- They diverge on capability: Maintenance Connection covers Deep asset hierarchies, Stoll covers Knit design.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Maintenance Connection and Stoll actually diverge.
| Attribute | Maintenance Connection | Stoll |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $300/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows |
| Category | Manufacturing | Fashion |
| Founded | Unknown | 1880 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Maintenance Connection
- Deep asset hierarchies
- Labour and cost tracking
- Multi-storeroom inventory
- Preventive and predictive
- Compliance reporting
- Enterprise integration
Only in Stoll
- Knit design
- Pattern creation
- Machine programming
- Stitch simulation
- Production planning
- Stoll machines
- CAD systems
- User authentication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Maintenance Connection
- Multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registersnot Stoll
- Organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulatornot Stoll
- Operations replacing an ageing enterprise CMMS rather than papernot Stoll
- Estates needing maintenance integrated with ERP and financenot Stoll
Stoll
- Flat knitting machine manufacturing (legacy/discontinued)not Maintenance Connection
- Knitting machine spare parts and servicenot Maintenance Connection
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Maintenance Connection
- Implementation is a project measured in months, and the cost of that work frequently exceeds the first year of licensing
- Pricing is entirely quote-based with no published entry point, so early comparison is impossible
- The interface reflects its age and is a common objection from technicians used to consumer-grade mobile apps
- Overpowered for single-site operations, where the configuration burden buys capability that will not be used
- Accruent sells a broad portfolio, so the buying process involves more product than a maintenance team asked for
Stoll
- No pricing available; the flat knitting machine business has been discontinued
- Production site in Reutlingen closed as of October 31, 2025
- Only spare parts and legacy service support remain available
Pricing, plan by plan
Maintenance Connection
On request- Maintenance Connection$undefined/year
- Work and asset management
- Multi-site
- Inventory
Stoll
$300/month- Basic$300/month
- Basic design
- Advanced$600/month
- Advanced features
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Full solution
Which should you pick?
Choose Maintenance Connection if
- You need deep asset hierarchies.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want labour and cost tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Maintenance Connection or Stoll better?
- Neither clearly leads. Maintenance Connection starts at On request and Stoll at $300/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Maintenance Connection or Stoll?
- Maintenance Connection starts at On request and Stoll at $300/month.
- Does Maintenance Connection or Stoll run on more platforms?
- Maintenance Connection runs on Web, iOS, Android. Stoll runs on Windows.
- What is Maintenance Connection best used for?
- Maintenance Connection is most often used for multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registers, organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulator, operations replacing an ageing enterprise cmms rather than paper, estates needing maintenance integrated with erp and finance. Of those, multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registers and organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulator are not what Stoll is typically brought in for.
- What can Maintenance Connection do that Stoll cannot?
- Maintenance Connection covers Deep asset hierarchies, Labour and cost tracking, Multi-storeroom inventory, Preventive and predictive. Stoll covers Knit design, Pattern creation, Machine programming, Stitch simulation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Maintenance Connection: Who is Maintenance Connection for?
Multi-site organisations with large asset registers and formal maintenance governance. Below that scale, the configuration effort is not repaid.
Stoll: Is STOLL still selling knitting machines?
No, STOLL's flat knitting machine business has been discontinued and the production site in Reutlingen was closed on October 31, 2025. Only spare parts availability and legacy service support remain.
SourceMaintenance Connection: What does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted, and implementation is a separate line that often exceeds first-year licensing.
Stoll: Where can I get spare parts for STOLL machines?
STOLL spare parts remain available through their support channels. The company has consolidated service operations under KARL MAYER ownership. Customers should contact STOLL's helpline or webshop for parts availability.
SourceMaintenance Connection: How does it differ from MaintainX?
Almost entirely. This is an enterprise system configured to enforce an existing process; MaintainX is a mobile app a team adopts in a day. They rarely appear on the same shortlist honestly.
Maintenance Connection: Is it good for regulated industries?
That is its strongest case. Audit trails, evidence of preventive regimes and multi-site consistency are what it is built to produce.
Maintenance Connection: What is the biggest risk in adopting it?
Under-resourcing implementation. A partially configured enterprise CMMS is worse than a well-run simple one, and this is the most common way these projects disappoint.
Related pages
More on Maintenance Connection
Other head to heads
- Maintenance Connection vs eMaint
- Maintenance Connection vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Maintenance Connection vs Hippo CMMS
- Maintenance Connection vs Litmus Edge
- Maintenance Connection vs Aras Innovator
- Maintenance Connection vs Fusion 360
- Maintenance Connection vs Ignition
- Maintenance Connection vs SolidWorks
- Maintenance Connection vs TrakSYS
- Maintenance Connection vs AVEVA System Platform
- Maintenance Connection vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Maintenance Connection vs Materialise Magics
- Maintenance Connection vs Oden Technologies
- Maintenance Connection vs OpenBOM
- Maintenance Connection vs Oqton
- Maintenance Connection vs Paperless Parts
- Maintenance Connection vs Petasense
- Maintenance Connection vs Poseidon Systems
- Maintenance Connection vs Gerber AccuMark
- Maintenance Connection vs Backbone PLM
- Maintenance Connection vs Browzwear
- Maintenance Connection vs Centric PLM
- Maintenance Connection vs Shima Seiki
- Maintenance Connection vs AVA CAD/CAM
- Maintenance Connection vs Optitex
- Maintenance Connection vs BlueCherry ERP
- Maintenance Connection vs NedGraphics
- Maintenance Connection vs Pointcarre
- Maintenance Connection vs Browzwear VStitcher
- Maintenance Connection vs NGC Software
- Maintenance Connection vs Bold Metrics
- Maintenance Connection vs Brandboom
- Maintenance Connection vs CBX Software
- Maintenance Connection vs Delogue PLM
- Maintenance Connection vs Edited
- Stoll vs eMaint
- Stoll vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Stoll vs Hippo CMMS
- Stoll vs Litmus Edge
- Stoll vs Aras Innovator
- Stoll vs Fusion 360
- Stoll vs Ignition
- Stoll vs SolidWorks
- Stoll vs TrakSYS
- Stoll vs AVEVA System Platform
- Stoll vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Stoll vs Materialise Magics
- Stoll vs Oden Technologies
- Stoll vs OpenBOM
- Stoll vs Oqton
- Stoll vs Paperless Parts
- Stoll vs Petasense
- Stoll vs Poseidon Systems
- Stoll vs Gerber AccuMark
- Stoll vs Backbone PLM
- Stoll vs Browzwear
- Stoll vs Centric PLM
- Stoll vs Shima Seiki
- Stoll vs AVA CAD/CAM
- Stoll vs Optitex
- Stoll vs BlueCherry ERP
- Stoll vs NedGraphics
- Stoll vs Pointcarre
- Stoll vs Browzwear VStitcher
- Stoll vs NGC Software
- Stoll vs Bold Metrics
- Stoll vs Brandboom
- Stoll vs CBX Software
- Stoll vs Delogue PLM
- Stoll vs Edited

