Cloud · head to head
Longhorn vs RAD Studio

Longhorn
Cloud
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

RAD Studio
Developer Tools
Cross-platform native app development with Delphi and C++Builder
- From
- $2000/perpetual
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Longhorn has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Longhorn there is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.; RAD Studio professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Longhorn and RAD Studio actually diverge.
| Attribute | Longhorn | RAD Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2000/perpetual |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | one-time |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Kubernetes | Web |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Longhorn
- Per-volume controllers
- Synchronous replication
- Snapshots and backups
- Volume expansion
- Disaster recovery volumes
- Web interface
Only in RAD Studio
Nothing recorded that Longhorn does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Longhorn
- An on-premises Kubernetes cluster with local disks and no SAN that needs replicated persistent volumesnot RAD Studio
- Edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole clusternot RAD Studio
- A K3s deployment where the storage layer must be light enough to run alongside the workloadsnot RAD Studio
- A team that wants snapshots and S3 backups of persistent volumes without paying per-node storage licencesnot RAD Studio
RAD Studio
- Building Windows desktop applications with VCL componentsnot Longhorn
- Creating iOS and Android apps from shared Delphi codebasenot Longhorn
- Connecting to Oracle databases through FireDAC connectivitynot Longhorn
- Building REST web services that run on Linux serversnot Longhorn
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Longhorn
- There is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- Synchronous replication across nodes means write latency depends on the slowest replica and the network between nodes, which makes it a poor fit for latency-sensitive databases.
- Every replica is a full copy, so three-way replication consumes three times the raw capacity, unlike erasure-coded systems that are far more space efficient.
- It is designed for block storage on modest clusters and does not scale to the node counts or throughput that Ceph or a commercial array handles, so growth eventually forces a migration.
- Recovery from certain degraded states, such as a volume stuck detaching or replicas failing to rebuild, requires manual intervention and knowledge of Longhorn internals that is not widely held.
RAD Studio
- Professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Enterprise edition steps up to $3,400 license plus $1,199 maintenance, and Architect edition to $4,416 license plus $2,183 maintenance
- The perpetual license only entitles the buyer to updates for one year; continued access to new updates and upgrades requires an annually renewable Update Subscription
Pricing, plan by plan
Longhorn
Free- LonghornFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
- No vendor SLA or escalation path
RAD Studio
$2000/perpetual- Professional Edition$2000/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $599
- Total $2,599 + Tax
- Enterprise Edition$3400/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $1,199
- Total $4,599 + Tax
- Architect Edition$4416/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $2,183
- Total $6,599 + Tax
Which should you pick?
Choose Longhorn if
- You need per-volume controllers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want synchronous replication.
Choose RAD Studio if
Nothing in the data separates RAD Studio from Longhorn on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Longhorn or RAD Studio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Longhorn starts at Free and RAD Studio at $2000/perpetual, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Longhorn or RAD Studio?
- Longhorn has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Longhorn and $2000/perpetual for RAD Studio.
- Does Longhorn or RAD Studio run on more platforms?
- Longhorn runs on Linux, Kubernetes. RAD Studio runs on Web.
- Can I use Longhorn for free?
- Yes. Longhorn has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. RAD Studio starts at $2000/perpetual.
- What is Longhorn best used for?
- Longhorn is most often used for an on-premises kubernetes cluster with local disks and no san that needs replicated persistent volumes, edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole cluster, a k3s deployment where the storage layer must be light enough to run alongside the workloads, a team that wants snapshots and s3 backups of persistent volumes without paying per-node storage licences. Of those, an on-premises kubernetes cluster with local disks and no san that needs replicated persistent volumes and edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole cluster are not what RAD Studio is typically brought in for.
- What can Longhorn do that RAD Studio cannot?
- Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers, Synchronous replication, Snapshots and backups, Volume expansion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Longhorn: Who do we call when it breaks?
Nobody, unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime, which includes commercial support for Longhorn. This is the decisive question for production use.
RAD Studio: How much does RAD Studio cost?
RAD Studio uses perpetual licensing: Professional Edition $2,000 perpetual license + $599 first year maintenance ($2,599 total + tax). Enterprise Edition $3,400 license + $1,199 maintenance ($4,599 total + tax). Architect Edition $4,416 license + $2,183 maintenance ($6,599 total + tax).
SourceLonghorn: How much capacity does replication cost?
Full copies, so three replicas means three times the raw capacity. Budget accordingly rather than assuming erasure coding efficiency.
RAD Studio: What is the difference between RAD Studio editions?
Professional Edition ($2,599 total + tax) targets individual developers. Enterprise Edition ($4,599 total + tax) adds multi-tier app capabilities. Architect Edition ($6,599 total + tax) includes advanced database and cloud features. All three include perpetual licenses.
SourceLonghorn: Is it suitable for production databases?
For modest workloads yes, but synchronous replication adds write latency and high-transaction databases usually want something faster.
RAD Studio: Does RAD Studio offer Kai AI integration and discounts?
Yes, adding Kai AI to any edition provides discounts: 25% off Professional ($2,136 + tax), 30% off Enterprise ($3,394 + tax), and 40% off Architect ($4,109 + tax). This promotion is active through August 31, 2026.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Longhorn vs Portworx
- Longhorn vs OpenEBS
- Longhorn vs Proxmox VE
- Longhorn vs Anyscale
- Longhorn vs Go
- Longhorn vs Rancher
- Longhorn vs Packer
- Longhorn vs DeepInfra
- Longhorn vs Serverless Framework
- Longhorn vs Coolify
- Longhorn vs Puppet
- Longhorn vs Qovery
- Longhorn vs Porter
- Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics
- Longhorn vs Vultr
- Longhorn vs Akamai
- Longhorn vs Vagrant
- Longhorn vs CLion
- Longhorn vs GNAT Pro
- Longhorn vs Rust
- Longhorn vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Longhorn vs Visual Studio Code
- Longhorn vs JetBrains Rider
- Longhorn vs StackBlitz
- Longhorn vs Visual Studio
- Longhorn vs Penpot
- Longhorn vs GitLab CI/CD
- Longhorn vs Helm
- Longhorn vs Notepad++
- Longhorn vs Pants Build
- Longhorn vs Swagger UI
- Longhorn vs Yarn
- Longhorn vs Ansible
- Longhorn vs Buildkite
- Longhorn vs Helix
- RAD Studio vs Portworx
- RAD Studio vs OpenEBS
- RAD Studio vs Proxmox VE
- RAD Studio vs Anyscale
- RAD Studio vs Go
- RAD Studio vs Rancher
- RAD Studio vs Packer
- RAD Studio vs DeepInfra
- RAD Studio vs Serverless Framework
- RAD Studio vs Coolify
- RAD Studio vs Puppet
- RAD Studio vs Qovery
- RAD Studio vs Porter
- RAD Studio vs VictoriaMetrics
- RAD Studio vs Vultr
- RAD Studio vs Akamai
- RAD Studio vs Vagrant
- RAD Studio vs CLion
- RAD Studio vs GNAT Pro
- RAD Studio vs Rust
- RAD Studio vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio Code
- RAD Studio vs JetBrains Rider
- RAD Studio vs StackBlitz
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio
- RAD Studio vs Penpot
- RAD Studio vs GitLab CI/CD
- RAD Studio vs Helm
- RAD Studio vs Notepad++
- RAD Studio vs Pants Build
- RAD Studio vs Swagger UI
- RAD Studio vs Yarn
- RAD Studio vs Ansible
- RAD Studio vs Buildkite
- RAD Studio vs Helix
