ERP · head to head
Levelpath vs Periscope Holdings

Levelpath
ERP
AI-native procurement built around intake, from the founders who previously built Scout RFP
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Levelpath it is a young platform competing with suites that have two decades of accumulated edge cases, and gaps tend to appear in tax handling, direct materials and unusual ERP configurations.; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: Levelpath covers Conversational intake, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Levelpath and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | Levelpath | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | ERP | Government |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Levelpath
- Conversational intake
- AI agents
- Sourcing events
- Contract management
- Supplier risk
- Mobile first
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Levelpath
- A company where employees bypass the procurement system entirely and spend under management has stallednot Periscope Holdings
- Replacing an enterprise suite whose rollout took two years and still has low requisition adoptionnot Periscope Holdings
- A finance team wanting every purchase request routed through policy without hiring more procurement staffnot Periscope Holdings
- A mid-market company implementing procurement software for the first time and unwilling to fund a systems integratornot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Levelpath
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Levelpath
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Levelpath
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Levelpath
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Levelpath
- It is a young platform competing with suites that have two decades of accumulated edge cases, and gaps tend to appear in tax handling, direct materials and unusual ERP configurations.
- No pricing is published at any tier, so buyers cannot judge whether the AI-native positioning carries a premium over established competitors.
- AI agents that classify and route requests are only as good as the policy configuration behind them, and a company with ambiguous procurement policy gets ambiguous automation.
- Venture funding at this scale implies growth expectations, which historically produces price increases at renewal once a customer base is captured.
- The intake-first design assumes procurement problems are adoption problems, which is not true for organisations whose real issue is category strategy or supplier consolidation.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Levelpath
On request- Levelpath$undefined/year
- Intake, sourcing, contracts and supplier management
- Priced by company size and modules, quoted directly
- AI agent capability included rather than sold as an add-on
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Levelpath if
- You need conversational intake.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want ai agents.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Levelpath or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. Levelpath starts at On request and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Levelpath or Periscope Holdings?
- Levelpath starts at On request and Periscope Holdings at On request.
- Does Levelpath or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- Levelpath runs on Web, iOS, Android. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- What is Levelpath best used for?
- Levelpath is most often used for a company where employees bypass the procurement system entirely and spend under management has stalled, replacing an enterprise suite whose rollout took two years and still has low requisition adoption, a finance team wanting every purchase request routed through policy without hiring more procurement staff, a mid-market company implementing procurement software for the first time and unwilling to fund a systems integrator. Of those, a company where employees bypass the procurement system entirely and spend under management has stalled and replacing an enterprise suite whose rollout took two years and still has low requisition adoption are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can Levelpath do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- Levelpath covers Conversational intake, AI agents, Sourcing events, Contract management. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Levelpath: Who is behind Levelpath?
Stan Garber and Alex Yakubovich, who previously founded Scout RFP and sold it to Workday.
Periscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Levelpath: Is pricing published?
No. Pricing is quoted by company size and module selection.
Periscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Levelpath: How long is implementation?
Levelpath positions implementation in weeks rather than the quarters typical of enterprise source-to-pay, which is the main practical claim to test in a reference call.
Periscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Levelpath: Does it handle direct materials?
It is built primarily for indirect spend. Manufacturers with bill of materials sourcing should look at established direct-capable suites.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Levelpath vs Ivalua
- Levelpath vs GEP SMART
- Levelpath vs Jaggaer
- Levelpath vs Omnea
- Levelpath vs Zip
- Levelpath vs Zycus
- Levelpath vs IFS Cloud
- Levelpath vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Levelpath vs IQMS
- Levelpath vs Sage X3
- Levelpath vs SYSPRO
- Levelpath vs Icertis
- Levelpath vs Global Shop Solutions
- Levelpath vs Infor
- Levelpath vs Java
- Levelpath vs Euna Solutions
- Levelpath vs Bidnet Direct
- Levelpath vs OpenGov
- Levelpath vs Bonfire
- Levelpath vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Levelpath vs NEOGOV
- Levelpath vs ArchiveSocial
- Levelpath vs Clariti
- Levelpath vs GovPilot
- Levelpath vs mySidewalk
- Levelpath vs SAP for Government
- Levelpath vs Axon Records
- Levelpath vs CitizenLab
- Levelpath vs ClearGov
- Levelpath vs eCode360
- Levelpath vs MyRec.com
- Levelpath vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Ivalua
- Periscope Holdings vs GEP SMART
- Periscope Holdings vs Jaggaer
- Periscope Holdings vs Omnea
- Periscope Holdings vs Zip
- Periscope Holdings vs Zycus
- Periscope Holdings vs IFS Cloud
- Periscope Holdings vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Periscope Holdings vs IQMS
- Periscope Holdings vs Sage X3
- Periscope Holdings vs SYSPRO
- Periscope Holdings vs Icertis
- Periscope Holdings vs Global Shop Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Infor
- Periscope Holdings vs Java
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
