Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Ladder vs Riskonnect

Ladder logo

Ladder

Insurance

Accessible life insurance for everyone

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Riskonnect logo

Riskonnect

Insurance

Integrated risk management and claims administration for corporate risk teams

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Ladder has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Ladder platform is in private beta with access restricted to invited users only; Riskonnect total first year cost is dominated by implementation rather than licence; vendor professional services frequently approach the annual licence figure and the internal staff time to define data structures and migrate historic claims is a comparable third cost that never appears in the quote.
  • They diverge on capability: Ladder covers Instant quotes, Riskonnect covers Claims administration.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Ladder and Riskonnect actually diverge.

Attributes where Ladder and Riskonnect differ
AttributeLadderRiskonnect
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumquote
Free tierYesNo
Founded2016Unknown

Identical on both: platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Ladder

  • Instant quotes
  • No medical exam required
  • Fast underwriting
  • Flexible terms
  • Online application
  • Digital policy delivery
  • Policy management
  • Beneficiary tracking

Only in Riskonnect

  • Claims administration
  • Total cost of risk reporting
  • Policy and exposure management
  • Enterprise risk management
  • Health and safety
  • Business continuity
  • Third party risk
  • Data integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Ladder

  • Life insurance shoppingnot Riskonnect
  • Quick policy purchasenot Riskonnect
  • Transparent quotesnot Riskonnect
  • Digital policy administrationnot Riskonnect

Riskonnect

  • A self insured employer that wants to own its workers compensation loss data rather than depend on the broker or TPA system it will lose at renewalnot Ladder
  • A risk manager building a defensible total cost of risk figure for the CFO across claims, premium, retained losses and collateralnot Ladder
  • A third party administrator running claims for multiple clients that needs separate entity structures on one platformnot Ladder
  • A multinational consolidating claims, safety incidents and enterprise risk registers onto one entity hierarchy for board reportingnot Ladder

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Ladder

  • Platform is in private beta with access restricted to invited users only
  • Future pricing model has not been announced

Riskonnect

  • Total first year cost is dominated by implementation rather than licence; vendor professional services frequently approach the annual licence figure and the internal staff time to define data structures and migrate historic claims is a comparable third cost that never appears in the quote.
  • The platform grew through acquisitions including Ventiv and Sword GRC, so module interfaces and administration models are not uniform and staff trained on one module do not transfer cleanly to another.
  • Licensing is modular, so the price quoted for a claims deployment rises materially the first time the risk team wants ERM or business continuity, and there is little negotiating leverage once the claims data is migrated.
  • Configuration depth means most changes go through an administrator or the vendor rather than an end user, and risk teams without a dedicated system administrator find that change requests queue for weeks.
  • Historic claims data migration quality depends entirely on what the outgoing broker or TPA will export, and incomplete legacy data undermines the multi year trend reporting that was the reason for buying.

Pricing, plan by plan

Ladder

Free
  • Get QuoteFree
    • Instant term life quotes
    • No medical exam
    • Flexible coverage amounts
  • Term Life Policy$undefined/month
    • 10, 20, or 30-year terms
    • Transparent pricing
    • Fast underwriting

Riskonnect

On request
  • Riskonnect Platform$undefined/year
    • Licensed by module, named user count and entity structure
    • Claims administration and RMIS core
    • Optional ERM, safety, continuity and third party risk modules

Which should you pick?

Choose Ladder if

  • You need instant quotes.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want no medical exam required.
Ladder review

Choose Riskonnect if

  • You need claims administration.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want total cost of risk reporting.
Riskonnect review

Questions people ask

Is Ladder or Riskonnect better?
Neither clearly leads. Ladder starts at Free and Riskonnect at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Ladder or Riskonnect?
Ladder has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ladder and On request for Riskonnect.
Does Ladder or Riskonnect run on more platforms?
Ladder runs on Web, Ios, Android. Riskonnect runs on Web, iOS, Android.
Can I use Ladder for free?
Yes. Ladder has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Riskonnect starts at On request.
What is Ladder best used for?
Ladder is most often used for life insurance shopping, quick policy purchase, transparent quotes, digital policy administration. Of those, life insurance shopping and quick policy purchase are not what Riskonnect is typically brought in for.
What can Ladder do that Riskonnect cannot?
Ladder covers Instant quotes, No medical exam required, Fast underwriting, Flexible terms. Riskonnect covers Claims administration, Total cost of risk reporting, Policy and exposure management, Enterprise risk management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Ladder: How much does Ladder cost?

Ladder is free during the beta period. No ads are shown, and personal information is not sold.

Source
Riskonnect: What does Riskonnect actually cost?

Nothing is published. Reported deals range from roughly 35,000 US dollars a year for a narrow deployment to well over 250,000 for a multi module enterprise programme, with implementation services quoted separately and often of similar magnitude in year one.

Ladder: Is portfolio verification required on Ladder?

Portfolio verification through brokerage connection is optional and shows only capital range, never position direction or size.

Source
Riskonnect: How long does implementation take?

Three to six months is typical for a claims and RMIS deployment, longer where historic loss data from several brokers or TPAs has to be normalised.

Ladder: When will Ladder charge for its service?

Ladder is currently in private beta with free access. No information about future pricing or premium features has been published.

Source
Riskonnect: Why not just use the broker supplied RMIS?

Because you lose it when you change broker, and the data model serves the broker reporting rather than yours. Owning the system is the main reason companies pay for one.

Riskonnect: Is it a GRC platform or a claims system?

Both, but the claims and insurable risk core is the mature part. If you want pure GRC without claims, you are buying more platform than you need.

Share

Related pages

More on Ladder

More on Riskonnect

Keep looking

Other head to heads