APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Vitess

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Vitess
Databases
Scalable database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Vitess vTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Vitess actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Vitess |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | APIs | Databases |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Vitess
- Horizontal Sharding
- Connection Pooling
- Query Routing
- Online Schema Changes
- Shard Management
- Replication Management
- Automated Failover
- MySQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Vitess
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Vitess
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Vitess
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Vitess
Vitess
- Transaction processingnot Kong Gateway
- Data storagenot Kong Gateway
- Application backendnot Kong Gateway
- Reportingnot Kong Gateway
- Data analyticsnot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Vitess
- VTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- Foreign key constraints not enforced across shards, requiring application-level integrity handling
- Single primary per keyspace limits multi-region write capabilities
- Distributed transactions without proper sharding key routing suffer performance degradation
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Vitess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vitess review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Vitess if
- You need horizontal sharding.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want connection pooling.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Vitess better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Vitess at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Vitess?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Vitess at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Vitess run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Vitess runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Vitess is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Vitess cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding, Connection Pooling, Query Routing, Online Schema Changes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceVitess: Is Vitess free to use?
Yes. Vitess is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a graduated CNCF project with no licensing costs or pricing tiers.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceVitess: What databases does Vitess support?
Vitess supports MySQL and MariaDB as backend databases. It acts as a middleware layer that adds sharding and orchestration capabilities on top of these databases.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess require Kubernetes to run?
No. Vitess can run on Kubernetes using the Vitess Operator, but it can also be deployed on traditional infrastructure. Kubernetes integration is optional and provides additional automation benefits.
SourceVitess: How does Vitess handle cross-shard transactions?
Vitess supports distributed transactions across shards, but they require queries to be routed through the sharding key. Transactions without a proper sharding key can result in slower performance.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess enforce foreign key constraints?
Vitess does not enforce foreign key constraints across shards by default. Referential integrity must be managed at the application layer, though per-database support can be enabled with limitations.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Cockroach Labs
- Kong Gateway vs TiDB
- Kong Gateway vs Readyset
- Kong Gateway vs Amazon Aurora
- Kong Gateway vs NATS
- Kong Gateway vs PostgreSQL
- Kong Gateway vs RabbitMQ
- Kong Gateway vs ClickHouse
- Kong Gateway vs Azure SQL
- Kong Gateway vs MariaDB
- Kong Gateway vs Oracle Database
- Kong Gateway vs IBM Db2
- Kong Gateway vs Instaclustr
- Kong Gateway vs Knack
- Kong Gateway vs LanceDB
- Kong Gateway vs Marqo
- Kong Gateway vs Nile
- Kong Gateway vs Amazon Redshift
- Vitess vs Tyk
- Vitess vs Moesif
- Vitess vs Treblle
- Vitess vs Convoy
- Vitess vs Janus Gateway
- Vitess vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Vitess vs Gravitee
- Vitess vs Strapi
- Vitess vs WSO2 API Manager
- Vitess vs AWS API Gateway
- Vitess vs GraphQL Apollo
- Vitess vs Appwrite
- Vitess vs Payload CMS
- Vitess vs Portkey
- Vitess vs Prisma
- Vitess vs RapidAPI
- Vitess vs REST Client VSCode
- Vitess vs Rutter
- Vitess vs Cockroach Labs
- Vitess vs TiDB
- Vitess vs Readyset
- Vitess vs Amazon Aurora
- Vitess vs NATS
- Vitess vs PostgreSQL
- Vitess vs RabbitMQ
- Vitess vs ClickHouse
- Vitess vs Azure SQL
- Vitess vs MariaDB
- Vitess vs Oracle Database
- Vitess vs IBM Db2
- Vitess vs Instaclustr
- Vitess vs Knack
- Vitess vs LanceDB
- Vitess vs Marqo
- Vitess vs Nile
- Vitess vs Amazon Redshift
