APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Puppeteer

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Puppeteer chrome and Firefox only, with no Safari or WebKit story
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Puppeteer covers DevTools Protocol.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Puppeteer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Puppeteer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | APIs | Testing |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Puppeteer
- DevTools Protocol
- Headless by default
- PDF and screenshots
- Network interception
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Puppeteer
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Puppeteer
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Puppeteer
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Puppeteer
Puppeteer
- Generating PDFs or screenshots of rendered pages on a servernot Kong Gateway
- Scraping sites that require JavaScript executionnot Kong Gateway
- Automating browser tasks where a full test framework is unnecessarynot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Puppeteer
- Chrome and Firefox only, with no Safari or WebKit story
- Not a test framework: assertions, retries and reporting need Jest or similar bolted on
- Bundles a Chromium download, which makes installs large and awkward in constrained CI images
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Puppeteer
Free- PuppeteerFree
- Full functionality
- Unlimited tests
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Puppeteer if
- You need devtools protocol.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want headless by default.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Puppeteer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Puppeteer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Puppeteer?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Puppeteer at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Puppeteer run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Puppeteer runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Puppeteer is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Puppeteer cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Puppeteer covers DevTools Protocol, Headless by default, PDF and screenshots, Network interception.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourcePuppeteer: Is Puppeteer free?
Yes, open source from the Chrome team.
Kong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourcePuppeteer: Puppeteer or Playwright?
Playwright came from the same original team, adds WebKit and Firefox support, automatic waiting and a test runner. Puppeteer stays a focused Chrome automation library, which is simpler if automation rather than testing is the goal.
Kong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourcePuppeteer: Can Puppeteer generate PDFs?
Yes, and it is one of the most common uses — rendering a page and printing it to PDF server-side.
Related pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Sensedia
- Kong Gateway vs Sila
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger
- Kong Gateway vs TIBCO Mashery
- Kong Gateway vs Zeplo
- Kong Gateway vs Selenium
- Kong Gateway vs Playwright
- Kong Gateway vs Appium
- Kong Gateway vs Qase
- Kong Gateway vs TestNG
- Kong Gateway vs Ranorex
- Kong Gateway vs BrowserStack
- Kong Gateway vs Cypress
- Kong Gateway vs CircleCI
- Kong Gateway vs Insomnia
- Kong Gateway vs BugHerd
- Kong Gateway vs Kameleoon
- Kong Gateway vs mabl
- Kong Gateway vs PractiTest
- Kong Gateway vs QA Wolf
- Kong Gateway vs Split
- Kong Gateway vs WebdriverIO
- Puppeteer vs Tyk
- Puppeteer vs Moesif
- Puppeteer vs Treblle
- Puppeteer vs Convoy
- Puppeteer vs Janus Gateway
- Puppeteer vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Puppeteer vs Gravitee
- Puppeteer vs Strapi
- Puppeteer vs WSO2 API Manager
- Puppeteer vs AWS API Gateway
- Puppeteer vs GraphQL Apollo
- Puppeteer vs Appwrite
- Puppeteer vs Sensedia
- Puppeteer vs Sila
- Puppeteer vs Swagger
- Puppeteer vs TIBCO Mashery
- Puppeteer vs Zeplo
- Puppeteer vs Selenium
- Puppeteer vs Playwright
- Puppeteer vs Appium
- Puppeteer vs Qase
- Puppeteer vs TestNG
- Puppeteer vs Ranorex
- Puppeteer vs BrowserStack
- Puppeteer vs Cypress
- Puppeteer vs CircleCI
- Puppeteer vs Insomnia
- Puppeteer vs BugHerd
- Puppeteer vs Kameleoon
- Puppeteer vs mabl
- Puppeteer vs PractiTest
- Puppeteer vs QA Wolf
- Puppeteer vs Split
- Puppeteer vs WebdriverIO

