Softwr

Libraries · head to head

Koha vs Leafmap

Koha logo

Koha

Libraries

The world's first free and open source library system

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Leafmap logo

Leafmap

Libraries

Python package for interactive geospatial mapping and analysis inside Jupyter notebooks

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Koha no pricing published; Koha is free and open source with no commercial licensing fee; Leafmap it is a Python library rather than an application, so there is nothing to buy, nothing to install for a non-technical colleague and no interface outside a notebook environment.
  • They diverge on capability: Koha covers Circulation management, Leafmap covers Multiple mapping backends.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Koha and Leafmap actually diverge.

Attributes where Koha and Leafmap differ
AttributeKohaLeafmap
Pricing modelopen-sourceOpen source, no licence fee
PlatformsWeb, ApiLinux, Windows, macOS
Founded1999Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Libraries).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Koha

  • Circulation management
  • MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging
  • Acquisitions
  • Serials management
  • Patron management
  • OPAC with faceted search
  • Reports and statistics
  • Z39.50 support

Only in Leafmap

  • Multiple mapping backends
  • Notebook interactivity
  • Raster and COG support
  • STAC catalogue access
  • Earth Engine integration
  • Basemap library
  • Vector data handling
  • Split map comparison

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Koha

  • Libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing feesnot Leafmap

Leafmap

  • A remote sensing course where students need interactive maps without learning JavaScript or a desktop GISnot Koha
  • A researcher exploring STAC-hosted satellite imagery inside a notebook before committing to a processing pipelinenot Koha
  • An analyst producing a shareable interactive map from a GeoDataFrame in a handful of linesnot Koha
  • A team prototyping a geospatial visualisation before deciding whether to build it properly in a web frameworknot Koha

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Koha

  • No pricing published; Koha is free and open source with no commercial licensing fee

Leafmap

  • It is a Python library rather than an application, so there is nothing to buy, nothing to install for a non-technical colleague and no interface outside a notebook environment.
  • Maintenance rests largely on one academic maintainer with grant funding, which makes long-term continuity a real consideration for anything beyond research use.
  • The API has moved quickly across releases, so notebooks written against an older version can break on upgrade, which undermines reproducibility in exactly the research settings where it is popular.
  • It abstracts over several third-party backends, so a bug or a rendering limitation is often in ipyleaflet, folium or MapLibre rather than in Leafmap, and diagnosing it means understanding the layer underneath anyway.
  • Large datasets rendered through notebook widgets become slow or unresponsive, so it does not scale to the data volumes a dedicated tiling service or desktop GIS handles comfortably.

Pricing, plan by plan

Koha

Free
  • Self-HostedFree
    • Full ILS functionality
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging (MARC21/UNIMARC)
  • Hosted (via partners)$150/month
    • Everything in Self-Hosted
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

Leafmap

Free
  • LeafmapFree
    • MIT licence
    • Installed from PyPI or conda-forge
    • No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose Koha if

  • You need circulation management.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want marc21/unimarc cataloging.
Koha review

Choose Leafmap if

  • You need multiple mapping backends.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, macOS.
  • You also want notebook interactivity.
Leafmap review

Questions people ask

Is Koha or Leafmap better?
Neither clearly leads. Koha starts at Free and Leafmap at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Koha or Leafmap?
Koha starts at Free and Leafmap at Free.
Does Koha or Leafmap run on more platforms?
Koha runs on Web, Api. Leafmap runs on Linux, Windows, macOS.
Can I use Koha for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Koha best used for?
Koha is most often used for libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees. Of those, libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees is not what Leafmap is typically brought in for.
What can Koha do that Leafmap cannot?
Koha covers Circulation management, MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. Leafmap covers Multiple mapping backends, Notebook interactivity, Raster and COG support, STAC catalogue access.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Koha: How much does Koha cost?

Koha is free and open source. There is no software licensing fee. Development is sponsored by libraries, volunteers, and support companies worldwide.

Source
Leafmap: Is Leafmap a product?

No. It is an MIT-licensed Python package installed from PyPI or conda-forge. There is nothing to purchase.

Koha: Are there paid support options available?

While no specific pricing is detailed on the main site, Koha mentions paid support options available from support companies, but exact costs require contacting providers directly.

Source
Leafmap: Who maintains it?

Primarily Qiusheng Wu at the University of Tennessee, with community contributors, funded through research grants rather than sales.

Leafmap: Can I buy support?

No commercial support offering exists. Help comes from GitHub issues and the community.

Leafmap: Is it suitable for a production web application?

It is not designed for that. Use it for analysis and prototyping, then build production maps on MapLibre, deck.gl or a hosted service.

Share

Related pages

More on Koha

More on Leafmap

Keep looking

Other head to heads