Databases · head to head
Knack vs turbopuffer

Knack
Databases
Hosted no-code database and web app builder priced by stored records and storage, with unlimited user accounts on every plan.
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -

turbopuffer
Databases
Closed-source vector and full-text search service built directly on object storage, with cold queries measured in seconds rather than milliseconds.
- From
- $16/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Knack plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.; turbopuffer a cold namespace pays object storage latency on the first query, with a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents, so any interactive search box needs the data kept warm or the user waits about a second.
- They diverge on capability: Knack covers Visual database builder, turbopuffer covers Object storage architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Knack and turbopuffer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Knack | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $59/month | $16/month |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Knack
- Visual database builder
- User logins and roles
- Page builder
- Unlimited users
- E-commerce
- Automation flows
- Scheduled tasks
- REST API and webhooks
Only in turbopuffer
- Object storage architecture
- Namespaces
- Vector search
- Full-text search
- Attribute filtering
- Documented limits
- Configurable consistency
- Durable writes
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Knack
- A member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own recordsnot turbopuffer
- Replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal toolnot turbopuffer
- Inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed whatnot turbopuffer
- A registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modestnot turbopuffer
turbopuffer
- A product with one search index per customer and thousands of customers, most of whose data is idle on any given daynot Knack
- Very large corpora where holding every vector in memory is the dominant cost and occasional cold-query latency is acceptablenot Knack
- Hybrid retrieval combining BM25 and vector search where running and synchronising two separate systems is the problem being solvednot Knack
- Retrieval for agent and assistant products where indexes are created and destroyed frequently and per-index overhead must be near zeronot Knack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Knack
- Plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.
- API access is capped per day, at 1,000 calls on the entry plan and 10,000 at the Corporate tier, so a scheduled sync or a busy automation can exhaust the day's quota before the working day ends and integrations then fail silently.
- The application itself cannot be exported or self-hosted; records can be downloaded but the pages, roles, flows and business logic exist only inside Knack, so outgrowing the platform means rebuilding the app rather than moving it.
- Customisation beyond the builder is limited to injected CSS and JavaScript that Knack's support does not cover, so any non-standard interface behaviour becomes yours to maintain against a DOM the vendor can change without warning.
- Compliance capabilities that regulated buyers assume are baseline, HIPAA and GovCloud options, advanced SSO, IP restrictions and private environments, are gated to the Corporate and Enterprise tiers, so a small regulated pilot cannot legitimately start on an entry plan.
turbopuffer
- A cold namespace pays object storage latency on the first query, with a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents, so any interactive search box needs the data kept warm or the user waits about a second.
- Queries are eventually consistent by default, and after roughly 128 MiB of outstanding writes new data is invisible until indexed, which the vendor puts at tens of seconds for small namespaces and tens of minutes for large ones, so a bulk re-index is not immediately queryable.
- It is closed source with no community edition, so single-tenant or bring-your-own-cloud deployment is a commercial negotiation rather than a deployment choice, and there is no path to running it yourself if the relationship ends.
- Per-namespace ceilings, roughly 10,000 writes per second, 32 MB/s and 500 million documents per shard, mean a single enormous index has to be sharded across namespaces by your application rather than by the service.
- It is a search engine, not a database: there are no joins, no cross-document transactions and no SQL, so it sits beside a primary datastore and keeping the two in step is work that belongs to you.
Pricing, plan by plan
Knack
$59/month- Starter$59/month
- 20,000 database records
- Unlimited users, tables, fields
- 25 AI credits
- Pro$130/month
- 50,000 database records
- Remove Knack branding
- E-commerce payments
- Corporate$300/month
- 125,000-2.5M database records
- App restore functionality
- Advanced SSO
- Enterprise$null/month
- Dedicated account manager
- HIPAA/GovCloud-based options
- Custom pricing
turbopuffer
$16/month- Launch$16/month
- All database features
- Multi-tenancy deployment
- SOC2 & GDPR-ready DPA
- Scale$256/month
- Everything in Launch
- HIPAA-ready BAA
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
- Enterprise$4096/month
- Everything in Scale
- Single-tenancy & BYOC deployment options
- Private networking
Which should you pick?
Choose turbopuffer if
- You need object storage architecture.
- You also want namespaces.
Questions people ask
- Is Knack or turbopuffer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Knack starts at $59/month and turbopuffer at $16/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Knack or turbopuffer?
- Knack starts at $59/month and turbopuffer at $16/month.
- Does Knack or turbopuffer run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Knack best used for?
- Knack is most often used for a member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own records, replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal tool, inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed what, a registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modest. Of those, a member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own records and replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal tool are not what turbopuffer is typically brought in for.
- What can Knack do that turbopuffer cannot?
- Knack covers Visual database builder, User logins and roles, Page builder, Unlimited users. turbopuffer covers Object storage architecture, Namespaces, Vector search, Full-text search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Knack: Is Knack charged per user?
No. User accounts are unlimited on all plans. Plans are bounded by stored record count, file storage, API calls per day and automation transactions.
turbopuffer: Can I self-host turbopuffer?
There is no open source or community edition. Single-tenant and bring-your-own-cloud deployments exist as commercial arrangements, but there is no way to run it independently of the vendor.
Knack: What happens when I exceed the record limit?
You move to a higher tier or reduce stored records. Because the limit is on data rather than people, apps that accumulate history hit it while apps that track a fixed set of entities generally do not.
turbopuffer: How fast is it really?
Warm queries perform comparably to in-memory search engines. Cold queries, where data is not cached, have a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents. Write p90 is around 248 ms for a 512 KB upsert because writes go straight to object storage.
Knack: Can I export my application or self-host it?
You can export record data. The application itself, its pages, roles, permissions and flows, is not exportable and cannot be self-hosted, so leaving means rebuilding elsewhere.
turbopuffer: Is it consistent?
Eventually consistent by default, with the vendor reporting that over 99.8% of queries return consistent data. Strong consistency can be requested per query at a latency cost. Large write bursts have a longer visibility delay while indexing catches up.
Knack: Is it suitable for public-facing portals?
That is its strongest case, because logins are unlimited and role-based permissions are built in. The constraint is record volume and API throughput, not audience size.
turbopuffer: What is it best at?
Large numbers of namespaces where most are idle. The architecture makes cold data cheap to keep, which is exactly the shape of a multi-tenant product with a long tail of inactive customers.
Knack: Can I use it for regulated data?
HIPAA-aligned and government cloud options exist but only on the Enterprise tier, along with private server environments. Lower tiers should not be used for regulated workloads.
turbopuffer: What are the hard limits?
Up to 128 billion documents and 256 TB per namespace, 500 million documents per shard, 64 MiB per document, 10,752 dense vector dimensions, roughly 10,000 writes per second per namespace and a maximum result set of 10,000.
Related pages
More on turbopuffer
Other head to heads
- Knack vs Airtable
- Knack vs Cockroach Labs
- Knack vs PostgreSQL
- Knack vs Amazon Aurora
- Knack vs BigQuery
- Knack vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Knack vs Dremio
- Knack vs DuckDB
- Knack vs Immuta
- Knack vs Turso
- Knack vs FaunaDB
- Knack vs Ninox
- Knack vs TimescaleDB
- Knack vs Apache Pinot
- Knack vs Amazon RDS
- Knack vs Apache Pulsar
- Knack vs Amazon Redshift
- Knack vs Chroma
- Knack vs Typesense
- Knack vs Dragonfly
- Knack vs LanceDB
- Knack vs Readyset
- Knack vs Valkey
- Knack vs Apache Doris
- Knack vs ArangoDB
- Knack vs Canary Labs
- Knack vs Apache Solr
- turbopuffer vs Airtable
- turbopuffer vs Cockroach Labs
- turbopuffer vs PostgreSQL
- turbopuffer vs Amazon Aurora
- turbopuffer vs BigQuery
- turbopuffer vs Firebase Realtime Database
- turbopuffer vs Dremio
- turbopuffer vs DuckDB
- turbopuffer vs Immuta
- turbopuffer vs Turso
- turbopuffer vs FaunaDB
- turbopuffer vs Ninox
- turbopuffer vs TimescaleDB
- turbopuffer vs Apache Pinot
- turbopuffer vs Amazon RDS
- turbopuffer vs Apache Pulsar
- turbopuffer vs Amazon Redshift
- turbopuffer vs Chroma
- turbopuffer vs Typesense
- turbopuffer vs Dragonfly
- turbopuffer vs LanceDB
- turbopuffer vs Readyset
- turbopuffer vs Valkey
- turbopuffer vs Apache Doris
- turbopuffer vs ArangoDB
- turbopuffer vs Canary Labs
- turbopuffer vs Apache Solr
