Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Mimecast

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Mimecast actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Mimecast does not also cover.
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Mimecast
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Mimecast
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Mimecast
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Mimecast
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Mimecast
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Keycloak
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Mimecast better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Mimecast at $4/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Mimecast?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Keycloak and $4/month for Mimecast.
- Does Keycloak or Mimecast run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mimecast starts at $4/month.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Mimecast is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Mimecast cannot?
- Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceMimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceMimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Proofpoint
- Keycloak vs Nessus
- Keycloak vs Qualys VMDR
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Chainguard
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Keycloak vs Netwrix
- Keycloak vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Keycloak vs Transmit Security
- Keycloak vs TrustArc
- Keycloak vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Keycloak vs VMware Carbon Black
- Keycloak vs Wireshark
- Keycloak vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs Penpot
- Mimecast vs Soketi
- Mimecast vs Ansible
- Mimecast vs Atlantis
- Mimecast vs Vite
- Mimecast vs Depot
- Mimecast vs Pants Build
- Mimecast vs Buildkite
- Mimecast vs Coder
- Mimecast vs Jitsu
- Mimecast vs Bitbucket
- Mimecast vs Sweep
- Mimecast vs Azure DevOps
- Mimecast vs Backstage
- Mimecast vs Claude Code
- Mimecast vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Mimecast vs Cody
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS

