Machine Learning · head to head
Keras vs Apache Spark MLlib

Apache Spark MLlib
Machine Learning
The machine learning library inside Apache Spark, for data that will not fit on one machine
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keras limited customization compared to TensorFlow; advanced users may find constraints in complex model designs; Apache Spark MLlib the algorithm set has grown slowly and its gradient boosting does not match XGBoost or LightGBM in accuracy or speed, so teams routinely do feature engineering in Spark and then train elsewhere, which undoes the argument for using it at all.
- They diverge on capability: Keras covers Sequential and Functional API, Apache Spark MLlib covers DataFrame-based pipelines.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keras and Apache Spark MLlib actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keras | Apache Spark MLlib |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Python, Google Colab, Jupyter | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Founded | 2015 | 1999 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keras
- Sequential and Functional API
- Pre-built neural network layers
- Model training and evaluation
- Transfer learning
- Model serialization
- TensorFlow
- JAX
- PyTorch
Only in Apache Spark MLlib
- DataFrame-based pipelines
- Distributed algorithms
- Alternating least squares
- Feature transformers
- Model selection
- Pipeline persistence
- Language bindings
- Runs in existing Spark deployments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keras
- Machine learningnot Apache Spark MLlib
- Data analysisnot Apache Spark MLlib
- Model trainingnot Apache Spark MLlib
- Predictive analyticsnot Apache Spark MLlib
Apache Spark MLlib
- Training on a data set too large to hold on one machine, where sampling down would lose the rare events you care aboutnot Keras
- Feature engineering and model fitting in one job over tables already in the lake, avoiding an extract and a second copy of sensitive datanot Keras
- Batch scoring of hundreds of millions of rows on a schedule, where throughput matters and per-request latency does notnot Keras
- Organisations that already run and pay for Spark, where adding a modelling step is cheaper than introducing a second platformnot Keras
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keras
- Limited customization compared to TensorFlow; advanced users may find constraints in complex model designs
- Error messages can be vague and unhelpful, making debugging challenging
- Smaller ecosystem and fewer pre-trained models than TensorFlow or PyTorch
Apache Spark MLlib
- The algorithm set has grown slowly and its gradient boosting does not match XGBoost or LightGBM in accuracy or speed, so teams routinely do feature engineering in Spark and then train elsewhere, which undoes the argument for using it at all.
- There is no deep learning in MLlib; neural network work on Spark requires a separate integration, and the DataFrame-centred interface is an awkward fit for it.
- Fitted models serialise into Spark's own format, so low-latency serving needs either a Spark session in the request path, which is far too slow, or a conversion through ONNX or MLeap, and this is where most Spark ML projects stall.
- Debugging is JVM cluster debugging: executor out-of-memory, shuffle spill, skewed partitions and serialisation failures, so an engineer without Spark operations experience spends more time tuning the cluster than improving the model.
- The cluster is the real cost and Spark holds executors for the duration of a job, so a badly partitioned training run pays for idle cores across the whole fleet while one straggler task finishes.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keras
Free- Open SourceFree
- High-level API
- Pre-built layers
- Model serialization
Apache Spark MLlib
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache Spark MLlib review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Keras if
- You need sequential and functional api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Python, Google Colab, Jupyter.
- You also want pre-built neural network layers.
Choose Apache Spark MLlib if
- You need dataframe-based pipelines.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want distributed algorithms.
Questions people ask
- Is Keras or Apache Spark MLlib better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keras starts at Free and Apache Spark MLlib at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keras or Apache Spark MLlib?
- Keras starts at Free and Apache Spark MLlib at Free.
- Does Keras or Apache Spark MLlib run on more platforms?
- Keras runs on Python, Google Colab, Jupyter. Apache Spark MLlib runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Keras for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keras best used for?
- Keras is most often used for machine learning, data analysis, model training, predictive analytics. Of those, machine learning and data analysis are not what Apache Spark MLlib is typically brought in for.
- What can Keras do that Apache Spark MLlib cannot?
- Keras covers Sequential and Functional API, Pre-built neural network layers, Model training and evaluation, Transfer learning. Apache Spark MLlib covers DataFrame-based pipelines, Distributed algorithms, Alternating least squares, Feature transformers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keras: What is Keras?
Keras is a high-level deep learning API built on top of TensorFlow that simplifies building and training neural networks. Keras 3 supports multiple backends including TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX, making it backend-agnostic.
SourceApache Spark MLlib: What is the difference between spark.ml and spark.mllib?
spark.ml is the DataFrame-based interface and the one to use. spark.mllib is the older RDD-based package, kept for compatibility, in maintenance and receiving no new features.
Keras: What model architectures does Keras support?
Keras supports the Sequential model for linear stacks of layers, the Functional API for arbitrary graph architectures, and model subclassing for custom implementations. All approaches provide access to layers, optimizers, metrics, and callbacks.
SourceApache Spark MLlib: Do I need a cluster?
Spark runs in local mode on one machine, which is useful for development, but if you are running on one machine you would generally be better served by scikit-learn or XGBoost, which are faster and more capable at that scale.
Keras: Can Keras models run on TPUs and GPUs?
Yes, Keras models can run on TPU Pods or large GPU clusters, be exported to run in browsers or on mobile devices, and be served via web APIs.
SourceApache Spark MLlib: Can I use scikit-learn on Spark instead?
Yes, and it is often the better answer. You can distribute independent model fits across the cluster, or use pandas user-defined functions to run per-group models, keeping Spark for the data and a mature library for the modelling.
Keras: Does Keras offer pre-trained models?
Yes, Keras provides pre-trained models through KerasHub and Keras Applications for common deep learning tasks like image classification, object detection, and NLP.
SourceApache Spark MLlib: How do I serve an MLlib model in real time?
Not directly. Either convert the pipeline to a portable format such as ONNX or MLeap, or reimplement the scoring path. Starting a Spark session per request adds seconds of overhead and is not a serving strategy.
Keras: Who should use Keras?
Keras is ideal for beginners and rapid prototyping due to its simplicity and user-friendly interface. Advanced users and production deployments may benefit more from lower-level frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch for greater customization.
SourceApache Spark MLlib: Is it free?
The library is Apache 2.0 and costs nothing. The cluster it runs on is billed by your cloud provider or by Databricks, and that is the actual expense.
Related pages
More on Apache Spark MLlib
Other head to heads
- Keras vs PyTorch
- Keras vs scikit-learn
- Keras vs Python
- Keras vs Anaconda
- Keras vs AWS SageMaker
- Keras vs Azure Machine Learning
- Keras vs DataRobot
- Keras vs Jupyter
- Keras vs H2O.ai
- Keras vs Dataiku
- Keras vs Pinecone
- Keras vs Groq
- Keras vs Weka
- Keras vs BentoML
- Keras vs ClearML
- Keras vs Cohere
- Keras vs Dask
- Keras vs Fal AI
- Keras vs Google Vertex AI
- Keras vs Databricks
- Keras vs MATLAB
- Keras vs SAS
- Keras vs Haystack
- Keras vs IBM SPSS
- Keras vs Minitab
- Keras vs Mistral AI
- Keras vs Ollama
- Keras vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Keras vs JMP
- Apache Spark MLlib vs PyTorch
- Apache Spark MLlib vs scikit-learn
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Python
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Anaconda
- Apache Spark MLlib vs AWS SageMaker
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Azure Machine Learning
- Apache Spark MLlib vs DataRobot
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Jupyter
- Apache Spark MLlib vs H2O.ai
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Dataiku
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Pinecone
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Groq
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Weka
- Apache Spark MLlib vs BentoML
- Apache Spark MLlib vs ClearML
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Cohere
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Dask
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Fal AI
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Google Vertex AI
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Databricks
- Apache Spark MLlib vs MATLAB
- Apache Spark MLlib vs SAS
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Haystack
- Apache Spark MLlib vs IBM SPSS
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Minitab
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Mistral AI
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Ollama
- Apache Spark MLlib vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Apache Spark MLlib vs JMP

